• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

At the heart of liberalism there is a fear of unchecked power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

At the heart of liberalism there is a fear of unchecked power? John Stuart Mill argued that 'the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any members in a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm from others'. This outlines the liberal view on the use of power. Unchecked power could come in two different forms: the first could be used by an individual over another. Liberals fear that free individuals may wish to exploit others if it is in their interest to do so. They may also break or ignore contracts when it suits them. The liberty of one person is always therefore in danger of becoming license to abuse another; each person can be said to be both a threat to and under threat from every other member of society. Our liberty requires that they are restrained from encroaching upon our freedom and in turn their liberty requires them to be safeguarded from us. ...read more.

Middle

Being able to threaten other individuals. The idea of universalism that everyone is born of equal morale worth would mean nothing in the face of unchecked power. Would everyone's opinion really matter if some are more important than others? The idea that all humans are rational would also be under threat. The ability to develop rational ideas would not grow under a system where power is abused. Would we retain the ability to remain tolerant in this situation? The idea of justice and equality of opportunity would also suffer. The main theme of this is that all these doctrines of liberal ideology rely on a certain aspect of freedom for the individual that unchecked power would infringe on. These central ideas are designed in a way to empower the individual but they can only do that if these ideas themselves are protected. Although liberals are convinced of the need for a government, they are also aware of the dangers that it embodies. ...read more.

Conclusion

Liberals also fear democracy because they believe that political wisdom is not evenly balanced. The educated are able to use their wisdom and experience for the good of others. This means that a representative system where the elected politicians are of an educated background would have been the most favoured. That is why John Stuart Mill suggested that the educated should have more votes than those less so. The system of checks and balances includes a bi-cameral parliament. Where the House of Lords can moderate the House of Commons, this ties in with JS Mill's comments about the more educated because the House of Commons represents the majority. Also the idea of pluralism is important to liberal ideology. More pluralism in a liberal democracy can only be a good thing. Pressure groups can add to the pluralism by challenging powerful government and reducing the democratic deficit. Liberalism as an ideology encapsulates individual freedom and, although it recognizes the need for a certain amount of intervention to protect that freedom, it must be concerned with what unchecked power can do. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. The Productivity of Colonial Power

    Another movement across the 'contact zone' which provoked particular fear was interbreeding. This can be seen most spectacularly in Latin America, where contemporary society is mestizo: a multiple patchwork of groups between margins of pure indigenous people and (very rarely)

  2. "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" why do liberals believe this ...

    Secondly, there would be competition and electoral choice, which would be ensured by political pluralism. Meaning that there would be many political parties for the electorate to choose from. Finally, there would be a clear distinction between the state and the society.

  1. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    However Mill did impose any restrictions on the individual that were designed to prevent a person from damaging themselves, either physically or morally. 'self-regarding' actions and 'other-regarding actions' can be seen as vague, and ambiguous. As a person going to a shop and buying a packet of crisps can be

  2. Liberalism has a dual commitment both to individual freedom and equality. How does liberalism ...

    They believe that it is the role of the state to correct social disadvantages and claim that the welfare state extends an individuals' equality and does not hinder any member of society. Classical liberals see the welfare state as an agent which reduces individual freedom and places limits on equality.

  1. Is Liberalism compatible with democracy?

    In short, we could say that Rousseau was showing a preference for consensus politics rather than simple majority rule. Rousseau therefore rejected democracy as a satisfactory system of government, except in the unusual circumstance that a small community of enlightened individuals take into account the interests of others as well as their own.

  2. Breaking down the Walls: A Discourse of Ideology and "Otherness"

    This example is best explicated using another cultural aspect of America, film or cinema. American films that engage African American subjects or subject matter, to me, try to capture the essence of what it is to be black while experiencing the subject or theme of the movie.

  1. America Liberalism

    stage for the train of thought that passes through the American colonies. However other writers such as John Winthrop also make points that break down the idea of liberty and rights. "In his speech 'A Little Speech on Liberty', he distinguishes between natural and civil liberty" (American Political Thinking).

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    to those who practice it. So the majority has in many cases made homosexual sex illegal, which the majority may claim to be better for the homosexuals as well. This is called being paternalistic. Another example of paternalism would be if a town banned bungee jumping from a local bridge because it was concerned that those jumping would be hurt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work