• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain is said to have "missed the boat" when considering European Affairs in 1970. To what extent is this the case?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Britain is said to have "missed the boat" when considering European Affairs in 1970. To what extent is this the case? Britain can definitely be said to have "missed the boat" in European affairs because when it eventually did join the EC the situation was far from perfect. There was a mounting oil crisis, which had increased the price of oil by 400%, producing a recession and slowing down economic growth. Britain thought that by joining they would share in the economic growth they had seen in the 1960s, only to find in the 1970s that growth had slumped. Without the economic growth the less attractive aspects of EC membership, such as The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), began to rear their head and arguments in favour of British membership was harder to withhold. Britain found that if joined straight away it would be one of the leading powers of the EC and therefore be able to be key in important decisions and be able to benefit them. ...read more.

Middle

However it was in 1965 the EEC, the ECSC and Euratom were brought together when the members signed the Merger Treaty, which established a single Commission and a single Council for the three communities. In the early 1960s the French president, Charles de Gaulle, sought to establish a French hegemony over the institutions of the Communities by fully exploiting the Council of Ministers. Britain signed an agreement setting up the European Free Trade Area in Stockholm during November 1959, and it came into force in April 1960. This was the competitor to the EEC. Britain claimed to admire the "economic and commercial freedom" of EFTA as against the "political straitjacket" of the EEC. Within a year the PM was to change his mind and apply for British membership of the EEC. Reasons for this were ones such as the Suez affair in 1956. It changed the attitude of the British government and led them to realise that her days as a world power were over. ...read more.

Conclusion

In December 1962 de Gaulle told Macmillan that he intended to veto Britain's application unless Britain broke with the American alliance. Macmillan did the opposite by having a meeting with President Kennedy, which resulted in the Nassau Agreement where Britain's stake in NATO's nuclear programme was increased. Instead of adopting the position of humble supplicant in applying to join the Communities, Britain gave the impression of doing Europe a favour by the application. It is a classic act of British arrogance, striking through the community even today. However in 1969 de Gaulle resigned due to members of the EC not liking the way he did things without consultation. Within the year, the new French president, George Pompidou, had met the new British PM, Ted Heath, and dropped the hint that France would no longer oppose British membership. Britain finally signed the Treaty of Accession in Brussels in 1972. The EEC finally conceded to Britain joining it, but at what cost, what had Britain missed out on. By "missing the European Community boat" it had firmly established itself as a lesser influence; forever? Well to date! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    The failure to join at this point was because Britain was accused of not being European enough. By insisting on conditions on Britain's membership proved that Britain did not have the compatibility needed to join without changing the Community already formed.

  2. Disneyland Resort Paris, Case Study

    Comment in more detail the issue of holiday regulation in Europe, the United States and Japan (duration, paid vs. unpaid holiday) and their impact on leisure consumption. Europeans certainly have a much longer vacation time than the Americans or the Japanese do.

  1. Why was the accession of the UK to the EEC in 1972 so politically ...

    saw it a step towards unifying economic policy and creating a single European currency (Bentley, 2006, p227). Various Acts passed in the last 25 years have handed more power to Europe and the European Union has become the supranational body which it was feared amongst eurosceptics that it would one day become.

  2. The French Revolution

    Children also had smaller hands, which were needed to reach into a machine. For these reasons, children as young as eight were sent to factories-usually textiles factories-where they became part of a growing business. The Industrial Revolution also led to the creation of new social and political ideologies.

  1. Free essay

    Has British Politics been Europeanised

    adopted European ideas and values, but it has been a gradual process; "Europeanisation is a process rather than a final product."16 This refers to the changes that have taken place in Britain that have been influenced by the EU, and furthermore, the changes that are still in progress, evolving and adapting.

  2. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    Earlier in 2003, as US Secretary of State Colin Powell (considered by many Europeans as the only "sane" person in the Bush administration) was still attempting a diplomatic resolution, French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin announced to the media that France would oppose any further UN resolutions authorizing military action.

  1. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    However, the cornerstone of the alliance was the commitment of the U.S. to defend Western Europe. Throughout the Cold War, we observed the cycle of "conflict, confrontation and compromise" between the superpowers.3 Nuclear armament, technology race and military interventions in the third world countries were only the extension and the tools of the maintenance of the cycle.

  2. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    The maximum value of a transfer is � 10,000 with S-Interpay, but this is planned to be increased to � 50,000 soon. Since processing is completely automated, a high degree of straight-through-processing is achieved. Unfortunately, there are no statistics on member banks and usage available.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work