• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

British Policy and the Creation of Israel

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Disclaimer: While I have no control to the extent which you use this work, I ask you to RESPECT MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY and NOT DIRECTLY COPY THIS ESSAY. Feel free to use aspects of it in your work or use it as a basis for any work you may need to do, but once again don't plagiarize my work! British Policy and the Creation of Israel British policy in the Middle East and particularity, Palestine, has played a great role in aiding the creation of Israel. Not only did Britain open the door for possible Zionist aims to be recognized in Palestine, but the vast majority of the policies Britain established concerning Palestine would assist Zionist goals, directly or indirectly. Even when Britain wanted to hinder the creation of a Jewish state, their policies would work against them and ultimately, it would be because of these British decisions and actions that a Jewish state in the Middle East would eventually be created. Britain's first major policy towards the Middle East came in July/October, 1915, with the advent of World War I earlier in the previous year. Fearing the loss of Egypt and the vitally important Suez Canal to the Ottoman Empire, Sir Henry McMahon, on behalf of the British Empire, wrote several letters and came to an agreement with a highly influential Arab leader, Sharif Hussein of Mecca, promising Arab independence in exchange for their cooperation in staging an Arab revolt against their Ottoman rulers. ...read more.

Middle

Then in June, 1922, as if to show their commitment to Zionist goals, Britain gave a Jewish Zionist, Herbert Samuel, the role of Britain's first High Commissioner (or Governor) to Palestine. As a direct result of Britain's mandate on Palestine, Jewish immigration to the country increased. However, as Ahrom Bregman and Jihan el-Tahri say in The Fifty Years War: Israel and the Arabs "[The Arabs] quickly began to fear that increased Jewish immigration would swamp them." With rising, Arab, insecurity came violence and as a result many Jews (and Arabs) were killed. This lead to British concern for the stability of the region and in July, 1937, a Royal Commission concluded with the 'Peel Report' that the partitioning of Palestine into separate territories, individually controlled by the Jews, Arabs and British, was the only way to quell unrest. The report also suggested that Jewish immigration should be limited to 12,000 people a year. While the report seemed to be somewhat anti-progressive towards the Zionist aspirations that Britain were so eager to meet in the San Remo Mandate, Zionists still accepted the report. This was because it would still provide an official Jewish national home and in the face of violence it re-affirmed Britain's commitment to Zionism. However, the real significance of the Peel report towards the creation of Israel lies in that, for the first time, partition would be ...read more.

Conclusion

was blown up, taking the lives of 91 people. After suffering international criticism and Jewish terrorism as a result of the White Paper, Britain decided to hand Palestine over to the United Nations (who would then partition it and create Israel). Then on the 15th of May, 1948, a disgraced Britain withdrew from Palestine, leaving behind a country in turmoil, a turmoil it had created through its 33 years of differing policy. Overall, British policy has played an integral role in the creation of Israel. Initially it opened up the possibility of a Jewish state in Palestine and gave the Zionists the strong European support it would need if their ambitions were ever to be recognized. British policy would then lay the groundwork for the Jewish state and facilitate more Jewish immigration, giving the Zionists their first real foothold on Palestine. It would pioneer the idea of Partition and even the British policy designed to work against Zionist aspirations (in the form of the White Paper) would inadvertently lead to global sympathy for the Jews. This in turn would lead to Britain's departure from Palestine, the partitioning of the country by the UN and finally an official Jewish state - Israel. Without any British intervention in Palestine, it is hard to see many of the above conditions occurring, conditions which were all necessary for the creation of Israel to actually occur. It is for this reason that British policy was absolutely vital to the creation of Israel. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Explain why the UNO decided to partition Palestine in 1948?

    Another reason why Britain handed over control was because there was a lot of pressure on the government at home to pull out. This was because there had already been many deaths, and the British people didn't want any more deaths for both groups and especially for the British soldiers.

  2. Why was the State of Israel successfully established in 1948?

    plan and called for a special session of the UN General Assembly to place Palestine under a United Nations trusteeship until a compromise between the Arabs and Jews could be reached. (14) This however was unrealistic and the Zionists knew this.

  1. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    Therefore, division of the Lebanon had been floated in the air. But the neighboring countries and the United States particularly were against of division. They all in their speeches and actions were supported integrity of whole Lebanon as the best solution for resolving the conflicts and for other countries and their interests too.

  2. U.S Policy Options Towards Iran's Nuclear Programs

    This is highly unlikely, but the main advantages of this option are readily apparent: namely, the U.S can permanently neutralize Iran as a military and regional threat by overthrowing a hostile authoritarian regime, with a friendlier democratic regime. However, there are many downsides which make this option so unlikely, including

  1. How important was the holocaust in the establishment of Israel.

    The first of these three groups, the Haganah; was the most organized group and later formed the bulk of the army for the new nation-state of Israel. It concentrated itself mainly on attacking the Arabs in the region who were angry at the Jewish invasion of their lands.

  2. Palestinian Middle East

    Israelis broke a number of peace treaties, which continued to provoke Palestinians to act out acts of terrorism; this is significant because if Israelis kept to terms of the treaty there may have been an end to the conflict. Palestinians have also become frustrated due to the amount of diplomacy

  1. The role of International law in regards to The Palestinian Dilemma.

    Local hostilities between Zionist and Arab forces deprived the 'peoples' in the mandated territory of rights explicitly protected by the Mandate and Article 80 of the Charter without their consent."17 Article 77 1. The trusteeship system shall apply to such territories in the following categories as may be placed thereunder by means of trusteeship agreements: a.

  2. In what ways was Soloman a successful king?

    The temple was a very positive thing for Solomon and was a credit to him. It was a reminder of God's power and was a focal point of worship for the people of Israel. It was a place that brought the people together and it appears that Solomon wanted to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work