• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

British Policy and the Creation of Israel

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Disclaimer: While I have no control to the extent which you use this work, I ask you to RESPECT MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY and NOT DIRECTLY COPY THIS ESSAY. Feel free to use aspects of it in your work or use it as a basis for any work you may need to do, but once again don't plagiarize my work! British Policy and the Creation of Israel British policy in the Middle East and particularity, Palestine, has played a great role in aiding the creation of Israel. Not only did Britain open the door for possible Zionist aims to be recognized in Palestine, but the vast majority of the policies Britain established concerning Palestine would assist Zionist goals, directly or indirectly. Even when Britain wanted to hinder the creation of a Jewish state, their policies would work against them and ultimately, it would be because of these British decisions and actions that a Jewish state in the Middle East would eventually be created. Britain's first major policy towards the Middle East came in July/October, 1915, with the advent of World War I earlier in the previous year. Fearing the loss of Egypt and the vitally important Suez Canal to the Ottoman Empire, Sir Henry McMahon, on behalf of the British Empire, wrote several letters and came to an agreement with a highly influential Arab leader, Sharif Hussein of Mecca, promising Arab independence in exchange for their cooperation in staging an Arab revolt against their Ottoman rulers. ...read more.

Middle

Then in June, 1922, as if to show their commitment to Zionist goals, Britain gave a Jewish Zionist, Herbert Samuel, the role of Britain's first High Commissioner (or Governor) to Palestine. As a direct result of Britain's mandate on Palestine, Jewish immigration to the country increased. However, as Ahrom Bregman and Jihan el-Tahri say in The Fifty Years War: Israel and the Arabs "[The Arabs] quickly began to fear that increased Jewish immigration would swamp them." With rising, Arab, insecurity came violence and as a result many Jews (and Arabs) were killed. This lead to British concern for the stability of the region and in July, 1937, a Royal Commission concluded with the 'Peel Report' that the partitioning of Palestine into separate territories, individually controlled by the Jews, Arabs and British, was the only way to quell unrest. The report also suggested that Jewish immigration should be limited to 12,000 people a year. While the report seemed to be somewhat anti-progressive towards the Zionist aspirations that Britain were so eager to meet in the San Remo Mandate, Zionists still accepted the report. This was because it would still provide an official Jewish national home and in the face of violence it re-affirmed Britain's commitment to Zionism. However, the real significance of the Peel report towards the creation of Israel lies in that, for the first time, partition would be ...read more.

Conclusion

was blown up, taking the lives of 91 people. After suffering international criticism and Jewish terrorism as a result of the White Paper, Britain decided to hand Palestine over to the United Nations (who would then partition it and create Israel). Then on the 15th of May, 1948, a disgraced Britain withdrew from Palestine, leaving behind a country in turmoil, a turmoil it had created through its 33 years of differing policy. Overall, British policy has played an integral role in the creation of Israel. Initially it opened up the possibility of a Jewish state in Palestine and gave the Zionists the strong European support it would need if their ambitions were ever to be recognized. British policy would then lay the groundwork for the Jewish state and facilitate more Jewish immigration, giving the Zionists their first real foothold on Palestine. It would pioneer the idea of Partition and even the British policy designed to work against Zionist aspirations (in the form of the White Paper) would inadvertently lead to global sympathy for the Jews. This in turn would lead to Britain's departure from Palestine, the partitioning of the country by the UN and finally an official Jewish state - Israel. Without any British intervention in Palestine, it is hard to see many of the above conditions occurring, conditions which were all necessary for the creation of Israel to actually occur. It is for this reason that British policy was absolutely vital to the creation of Israel. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Explain why the UNO decided to partition Palestine in 1948?

    Another reason why Britain handed over control was because there was a lot of pressure on the government at home to pull out. This was because there had already been many deaths, and the British people didn't want any more deaths for both groups and especially for the British soldiers.

  2. Can terrorism ever be a legitimate and effective means of pursuing political goals?

    have selectively chosen their victims and some that have gone to great lengths to avoid what we would call 'collateral damage'. Narodnaya Volya (NV), a 19th century revolutionary organization carefully chose their targets and planned their attacks to avoid innocent casualties, often compromising the mission rather than causing collateral damage.

  1. U.S Policy Options Towards Iran's Nuclear Programs

    a certain lack of international support for an invasion by a military already stretched to the breaking point in Iraq. Secondly, as illustrated by the Iraq quagmire, it is doubtful that the U.S can occupy Iran and pave the way for a Western-style democratic regime, if indeed the U.S had

  2. Palestinian Middle East

    to cope with their anger and more and more people join the Hamas Political party. The Hamas political party believe in violence and aim to obliterate Israel, the military attacks by Israel are a main reason for the increase in popularity of the Hamas party.

  1. It seemed like an ordinary night. The soft whine of the wind echoed throughout ...

    A sharp tap came out of nowhere. A wave of panic flooded over Trevor. Even quicker, and with increasing desperation, he searched for the light switch almost running along the wall. His brain was going into overdrive. Suddenly his hand caught a block on the wall.

  2. 'The new Palestinian Revolt',

    Palestinians dead and 200 wounded."14 He further quotes Israeli military legal adviser Daniel Reisner who expressed that Israeli doctrine allows, "...the full use of weapons against anyone who endangers lives and especially at anyone who shoots at our forces or at Israelis"15 In Israeli terms this includes the use of

  1. GCSE Coursework: The Holocaust

    On April 11th 1945 American forcesdiscovered the camp at Buchenwald and found things worse than anything they had seen so far throughout the war. In Nuremburg 1945 the Allies put some of the Nazi leaders on trial, many were sentenced to death, other received only a few years in jail.

  2. How did the village of Dier Yassin come to be fought over in 1948, ...

    The source was wrote in 1961, 13yrs after the attack, there has been no major developments or wars in the 13yrs but anger has had time to brew and there has been more time for a myth to be created.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work