• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Can the use of the First Past the Post electoral system be justified in a modern democracy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Can the use of the First Past the Post electoral system be justified in a modern democracy? [50] The 'first past the post' electoral system is a simple majority system whereby the country is divided into single member constituencies and voters select a single candidate who only requires a simple plurality of votes to win the election. It is extremely difficult to define a modern democracy, but the core ideas would be that it allows the people to govern (in most cases through elected officials) and fair and equal representation for all. Thus, for the FPTP system to be justified it must meet this criteria, and whilst it does usually fulfil it's role of creating strong, single party government it unquestionably fails in encouraging participation and providing equal representation and therefore it is hard to justify. One of the main reasons why it can be seen as justified is the fact that it provides strong and single party government. The United Kingdom has always employed a first past the post system and for this reason there has only been six coalition governments in its history and only two since 1940. ...read more.

Middle

This is clearly a key feature in a Democracy as the only way for a representative to efficiently be able to represent is through frequent contact with the people they're representing. For example, under the party list system as seen in many European countries such as Belgium and Luxembourg, the link is completely broken which has unquestionably democratic implications. However, under FPTP as seen with the nomination of Electoral College voters in the USA and the Canadian Federal elections, this link is strongly maintained. However, there are clear issues with the first past the post arrangement that render it unjustifiable in a modern democracy; the main problem being the lack of representation it provides. For example, in the 2010 UK General Election, UKIP received 919,000 votes but gained no seats whilst the Alliance Party gained 42,000 votes yet got one seat. In a proportional system however, this would not be the case as the number of seats a party received would correspond much closer with the number of votes they receive; in Israel under the party list system in 2009, the Kadima party gained 22.4% of the vote and 28 seats and the Hadash party gained 3.32% of the vote and 4 seats which is far more proportional. ...read more.

Conclusion

This idea derives from Duverger's law, and economist Jeffrey Sachs states that 'the main reason for America's majoritarian character is the electoral system for Congress'. This can also be clearly seen in the UK where 18 out of the 23 general elections since 1922 have produced a single party majority. Furthermore, the notion that coalition governments are always weak governments is not always the case, as Germany has always had coalition governments yet has managed to push forward social change as well as becoming a major force on the international scene. It is therefore clear that whilst the First Past the Post system succeeds in creating single party governments, this is really the only benefit it has over the other systems, and in some cases as seen in Germany coalition governments can be fruitful. It fails enormously in it's role of representation as smaller parties are clearly marginalized, and a vast proportion of the vote is wasted on these parties which due to the nature of the system are not going to gain any significant power. Therefore, the system is unjustifiable in a modern democracy and whilst the alternatives are not perfect, a number of them are more Democratic than First Past the Post. ?? ?? ?? ?? Oli Palmer 13I ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Response to the question

In this question, candidates must use their knowledge of First-Past-the-Post and how it operates to both defend and criticise it, before making a judgement about the system, and answering the question of whether it can be justified in modern democracies. ...

Read full review

Response to the question

In this question, candidates must use their knowledge of First-Past-the-Post and how it operates to both defend and criticise it, before making a judgement about the system, and answering the question of whether it can be justified in modern democracies. There is also the possibility, and this candidate demonstrates it, of bringing in other electoral systems in order to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of First-Past-the-Post by comparing it to the other systems. This candidate's response to the question is strong and well-developed, and shows other students of A Level Politics how an essay should be written.

Level of analysis

The level of analysis in this essay is one of its strengths; the frequent use of and variation in examples from political history (the UK, India, Germany, the US, etc.) is impressive and demonstrates that the candidate has an excellent knowledge of politics. However, what makes this essay particularly good is the fact that examples are not simply tacked on to the end of an argument or point. Instead, the candidate makes reference to their example and then goes on to explain why it is relevant and the significance of it in their argument. This is the critical part that gains this candidate access to the top grades, as it shows the examiner that the candidate can adapt and apply their knowledge of politics under pressure. The inclusion of equally-weighted analysis on both the argument and counterargument in this essay allows the candidate to discuss both sides before coming to a conclusion, making for a balanced essay which comes across as well-written.

Quality of writing

The candidate shows a mature style of writing which flows well, and uses appropriate and specific vocabulary ("majoritarian system", "Electoral College", for example). There are also no spelling or grammatical issues. The use of a clear structure which introduces the essay, focuses on the argument, then the counterargument before concluding is effective because of its clarity and simplicity. Some prefer to write an argument and then follow it with the counterargument, and both structures are good, but the one this candidate has used can be best under pressure, and is less complicated for the student writing the essay.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by ecaudate 31/07/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. An essay on David Ricardo's Major Contribution to Economics

    This was really an updated and extended version made vastly more complex of his 1815 Essay. However in this treatise Ricardo illustrates one of the most renowned economic theories, the theory of comparative advantage. This theory was based on relative opportunity costs between countries.

  2. What are the main advantages and limitations of the trait and type approaches to ...

    However, one of the most obvious difficulties with such an approach is that it uses most often as its basic data personality tests with paper and pen. Since the answers are usually so simple, such as "Yes", "No", the questions are difficult to answer in a definite manner, but if the answer spaces are all blanks, there is no test.

  1. Useing decision maths to help me find out what I have to do in ...

    will need 4 workers, and then an extra worker for just 3 days. I will now do the latest start and finish times and see whether the outcome is different...

  2. Similarities and differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism

    order is to be preferred."20 21st century religious fundamentalism does possess this quality and one instance will be how Islamic fundamentalist view the Israel issue where they see Israel as a western creation due to no fault of their own and sought not to recognize the status quo but to take steps to revise it.

  1. "What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Marxist histories"?

    Through the logic of capitalism, Marx determined that Humans hold an neccesary role as material beings, driven to take on the role of what is neccesary to survive, be it hunter gatherer or labourer. Historical Materialism is the application of Marxist science to historical development.

  2. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    Also, in the nineteenth century was the introduction of the concept of 'self regarding' actions and 'negative freedom'. There have been many explanations and theories on distinguishing what is exercising freedom and what is infringing and, or abusing other people and there rights.

  1. Compare and contrast the pluralist, elitist and Marxist theories of the state.

    that the political system is all-inclusive, and operates on the basis of consensus"8. This ensures that everyone's interests are taken into account and therefore everyone attains satisfaction. Elitism "connotes exclusiveness in combination with special skills or resources; not every minority or interest group can be described as an elite".9 Classical

  2. Do you agree with Churchill's statement that "democracy is the worst form of government ...

    On the other hand, since democracy is never a self going process. If the citizens are not familiar with the process of just democratic elections and parliamentarian process the system might fails with the participation of the inhabitants. This happened in Germany, there were several reasons why Germany has failed with democratic system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work