• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Castlereagh had limited success in the context of British Foreign Policy between 1815 and 1822. Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Castlereagh had limited success in the context of British Foreign Policy between 1815 and 1822. Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement. On one hand I agree that Castlereagh achieved only limited success during his time as British Foreign Secretary as certain aspects of his policy such as the concept of a congress system and the apparent lack of an insular policy earned Castlereagh his critics within Britain. However it can also be argued that the positive points of Castlereagh's foreign policy greatly out number the negatives, meaning that he achieved much more than "limited success." This is demonstrated in the fact that a similar system of Foreign Policy was followed by Castlereagh's successors, such as Canning, Palmerston and the Earl of Aberdeen, for the next century. The fact that the success of Castlereagh's foreign policy can be described as far more than limited is evident in that he was able to achieve his 3 main aims of maintaining the balance of power, keeping the peace and ensuring co-operation within Europe. ...read more.

Middle

It was important for the future of Europe that France could join an alliance so by ensuring that France did not face humiliation, Castlereagh was able to maintain the possibility of an alliance and keep the peace. Castlereagh's success between the years of 1815-1822 can be further illustrated by studying the longer term impacts of his diplomacy. Castlereagh dealt with the immediate problems that followed the war in his role of "Architect of Peace" and he also contributed to the cause for long-term peace which meant that war was avoided for a further hundred years. In addition to this, securing European peace enabled Castlereagh to do as he pleased outside of the continent which allowed Britain to become the biggest Imperial power the world has ever seen. Another reason as to why the view that Castlereagh achieved only limited success can be challenged is that Canning, and later others, continued to follow the same sort of Foreign Policy aims therefore vindicating that what Castlereagh had been doing was right. ...read more.

Conclusion

However by focusing on keeping the peace, ensuring co-operation and maintaining the balance of power, Castlereagh was actually greatly assisting British interests as a stable Europe meant that Britain could trade with ease and focus on its territorial ambitious away from Europe. In conclusion I disagree with the statement that Castlereagh "had limited success in the context of British Foreign Policy." Despite failings in the congress system and coming under some criticism for being believed to be close to absolutist leaders and following what some thought was a non-insular policy, Castlereagh achieved the three main aims of his foreign policy which were to achieve co-operation between countries, maintain peace and maintain the balance of power. He was responsible for a system of democracy which saw countries sitting down to resolve their problems and the main principles of his foreign policy were followed by his successors for many years to come. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. "Compare the successes and failures of Castlereagh and Canning's Foreign Policies"

    Next, Castlereagh was concerned with Territorial settlement in Europe. The gains eventually were moderate and balanced with Britain keeping the essential naval bases, such as Salon (Sri Lanka), Gibraltar and the Cape Colony and his collaboration with Metternich helped in resisting Prussia's claim for the whole of Saxony.

  2. presidential power how far does it go

    is based on the contention of a ticking time bomb. This leaked memo from the Justice Department argued that torture may be legitimized to prevent an immediate threat to human life. A "third party who has no humane alternative to obtain information to save lives" would recognize that there are occasions when violating norms are understandable though not necessarily correct.

  1. 'Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of ...

    Violence personifies our inability as Indians to be part of the Indian government."13 Jinnah stood for 'ordered progress', moderation, gradualism and constitutionalism.14 At this point India was suffering from political terrorism. Sabotage, de-railing of trains and attacks on British civilians were increasingly becoming common.

  2. A Foreign Policy of Freedom. A United States foreign policy of intervention, through ...

    The United States' current policy of intervention is harmful economically and it incites hatred around the world. Many believe that 9/11 happened because "they" hated the United States because of freedom and prosperity. Intervention was actually the main factor for the attacks on 9/11.

  1. How successfully did the European Congresses maintain European peace between 1815-1830?

    To What Extent were the great powers at Vienna motivated by principle or self-interest? * The great powers at the Congress of Vienna were motivated by principles that genuinely served their self-interest. All the peacemakers at the Congress wanted to make peace, and each country showed the ability to make sacrifices and the ability for compromise.

  2. What were the aims and achievements of Lord Castlereagh in foreign affairs after the ...

    Similar events in Portugal, Naples and Piedmont also achieved democratic constitutions. * The congress of Troppau(1820) Castlereagh did not attend this meeting as the meeting was set up intended to destroy the new constitutions. It was not that he approved of Liberal revolutions, but was unwilling to involve Britain in general commitments on the continent.

  1. Explain the Success and Failure of Constitutions.

    The British Constitution, where power lies supremely with the government, the legislature, cannot be regarded as a failure. The success of this constitution could perhaps be explained by its flexible and articulate nature, which allows gradual change. A good example of this in practise is the enfranchisement of Britain, which took almost a century to attain.

  2. How far do you agree the USA remains a global hegemony today?

    Facts show that the U.S. military was used a number of times in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in the Americas to protect U.S. interests. The big difference is in the apparent level of threat. Threat of force by the United States, since its rise to superpower status, has never

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work