• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Castlereagh had limited success in the context of British Foreign Policy between 1815 and 1822. Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Castlereagh had limited success in the context of British Foreign Policy between 1815 and 1822. Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement. On one hand I agree that Castlereagh achieved only limited success during his time as British Foreign Secretary as certain aspects of his policy such as the concept of a congress system and the apparent lack of an insular policy earned Castlereagh his critics within Britain. However it can also be argued that the positive points of Castlereagh's foreign policy greatly out number the negatives, meaning that he achieved much more than "limited success." This is demonstrated in the fact that a similar system of Foreign Policy was followed by Castlereagh's successors, such as Canning, Palmerston and the Earl of Aberdeen, for the next century. The fact that the success of Castlereagh's foreign policy can be described as far more than limited is evident in that he was able to achieve his 3 main aims of maintaining the balance of power, keeping the peace and ensuring co-operation within Europe. ...read more.

Middle

It was important for the future of Europe that France could join an alliance so by ensuring that France did not face humiliation, Castlereagh was able to maintain the possibility of an alliance and keep the peace. Castlereagh's success between the years of 1815-1822 can be further illustrated by studying the longer term impacts of his diplomacy. Castlereagh dealt with the immediate problems that followed the war in his role of "Architect of Peace" and he also contributed to the cause for long-term peace which meant that war was avoided for a further hundred years. In addition to this, securing European peace enabled Castlereagh to do as he pleased outside of the continent which allowed Britain to become the biggest Imperial power the world has ever seen. Another reason as to why the view that Castlereagh achieved only limited success can be challenged is that Canning, and later others, continued to follow the same sort of Foreign Policy aims therefore vindicating that what Castlereagh had been doing was right. ...read more.

Conclusion

However by focusing on keeping the peace, ensuring co-operation and maintaining the balance of power, Castlereagh was actually greatly assisting British interests as a stable Europe meant that Britain could trade with ease and focus on its territorial ambitious away from Europe. In conclusion I disagree with the statement that Castlereagh "had limited success in the context of British Foreign Policy." Despite failings in the congress system and coming under some criticism for being believed to be close to absolutist leaders and following what some thought was a non-insular policy, Castlereagh achieved the three main aims of his foreign policy which were to achieve co-operation between countries, maintain peace and maintain the balance of power. He was responsible for a system of democracy which saw countries sitting down to resolve their problems and the main principles of his foreign policy were followed by his successors for many years to come. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. "Compare the successes and failures of Castlereagh and Canning's Foreign Policies"

    The second congress of Troppau, Russia and Prussia urged the British, French and the Austrians to intervene in Spanish internal affairs to suppress the uprising there. Castlereagh wanted minimum interference in the internal affairs of any country and he was against the use of international bodies to eradicate the revolution on a wide scale.

  2. presidential power how far does it go

    The second step is to look at particulars. The contention that expansion of the FISA authority is unwarranted can be countered by the Moussaoui case where the FBI did not believe it had enough evidence under current statutes to inspect the computer files of a a suspect foreign national.

  1. What were the aims and achievements of Lord Castlereagh in foreign affairs after the ...

    Similar events in Portugal, Naples and Piedmont also achieved democratic constitutions. * The congress of Troppau(1820) Castlereagh did not attend this meeting as the meeting was set up intended to destroy the new constitutions. It was not that he approved of Liberal revolutions, but was unwilling to involve Britain in general commitments on the continent.

  2. A Foreign Policy of Freedom. A United States foreign policy of intervention, through ...

    The United States' current policy of intervention is harmful economically and it incites hatred around the world. Many believe that 9/11 happened because "they" hated the United States because of freedom and prosperity. Intervention was actually the main factor for the attacks on 9/11.

  1. 'Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of ...

    rose to prominence and earned the respect of both Hindus and Muslims. His efforts as a negotiator between the political parties had shown that he could support his claims of being a staunch advocate for Hindu-Muslim unity and back it up with action.

  2. Explain the Success and Failure of Constitutions.

    The Government introduced this necessary legislation following the changes in society. Without this change, Britain's Constitution would have failed to meet the needs of the people, and fall in the face of popular revolt.

  1. Mexican Border Problems

    And we are now seeing a larger number of people cross our southern border who are from countries of interest as opposed to just Latin American [countries]." He pointed out that speaking about the illegal immigrants there is one more problem.

  2. How far do you agree the USA remains a global hegemony today?

    Total GDP in 2001 was almost as much as the combined total of the next six top GDP countries in the world. The next closest state was Japan with less than half the GDP of the United States. From 1990 until the end of 2001, real gross domestic product rose from $6,707.9 billion to $10,171.4 billion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work