• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of political power.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of political power. Pluralist political power is a theory which states that political power in a state is dispersed among the people and works for all the people. It can be described as an "Open Political System". Elitist theorists however, put forward the Ruling Elite Theory. This is that the ruling elite are a minority which rules over the majority in the interest of the minority and that the minority is not concerned with or accountable to the minority. To compare these two contrasting theories on political power, will show many points where the two accounts clash, showing how they cannot both be the correct account for political power, although I will not be able to say which it is that is correct for political power today. Both theories state that there are a number of requirements for them. In pluralism, these requirements are what are needed for a pluralist political system to operate in a particular state, whilst in ruling elite theory the requirements are what are there already and which therefore allow the theory to be correct in the eyes of its theorists and followers. Pluralism has 8 key concepts which need to be there for it to work, they are all necessary, but none are sufficient. ...read more.


This means that in the U.S the places of access to political power and decisions etc. is decentralized therefore can be accessed all over. This decentralization however, is not necessary to pluralism. What is necessary is a plurality of political resources, such as the most basic resources of the vote, the right to start an organisation and free and accurate political information. These resources cannot be monopolised by any one group as this would be rule through tyranny by that group. In a pluralist political system decisions cannot be made through substantive consensus, where everyone has to agree on each decision made. This is because of the social diversity and the great variety of interests and groups involved that it is impossible for there to be a total agreement on each decision. Instead they use procedural consensus. This is where instead of agreeing on each decision to be made, they agree on how each decision is made, so that it cannot be argued that it was unfair, because there is a consensus on the procedure for decision making. For these pluralist states, there are two main features which control the decision making. Firstly no single group dominates decision making, it is done through many different small groups exercising power together so that the decisions are not made through tyranny or to be used to advantage only one small group. ...read more.


They say that with this then, it cannot mould public opinion and so no bias will appear as there are so many varieties. They claim that the variety is also there because papers and so on adjust their content to the public or they just would not get any readers or viewers, so they adjust to the public as opposed to the public adjusting to them. Pluralists will also argue that where there is a ruling elite there is a pluralism between them, and so even this stops the tyranny of the ruling elite being effective. They say that although there is a coherence within ruling elites, there is no coherence between ruling elites, as they have to win the elections to become "The" ruling elite. So that means that the ruling elites have to exercise political power fairly and for the people or they would be beaten in the next election. Cox, Andrew. 1985. Power in Capitalist Societies: Theory, Explanations and Cases. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Burch, Martin. 1985. Three Political Systems: A Reader in Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press Dunleavy, Patrick and O'Leary, Brendan. 1987. Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Holden, Barry. 1993. Understanding Liberal Democracy. London: Prentice Hall Schwarzmentel, J.J. 1987. Structures of Power: An Introduction to Politics. London: Atlantic Books Young, Ralph. 1993. Introducing Government. Manchester: Manchester University Press ?? ?? ?? ?? Lib No. 00548926 Owen Laverty Tutor: David Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the pluralist, elitist and Marxist theories of the state.

    These sectional interests are maintained through ensuring a democratic political system is employed. Political parties need a sufficiently broad appeal to collect enough votes to win an election. Therefore, they have to broaden their appeal to a wider range of interests.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    When these groups lie outside the Iron Triangle, they are far less inhibited by considerations of equilibria then when they are inside it. This single-issue focus is indeed one of the reasons why even small and not well-financed public

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    Conclusions: In the third section we see the ekklesia become the ultimate authority on all matters of state. Democracy had matured. It was the ekklesia that determined not only questions of military policy but relatively trivial matters as well. It seems unlikely that those living at the far corners of

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    free market economy, where there isprivate ownership of property, and the economic freedom to buy, sell, or trade with whomsoever you chose. The critical element of the term is that there is limited government in place to enforce contracts and to provide a safe trading environment.

  1. What are the dilemmas of a pluralist democracy?

    This is undisputable and most easily achieved by the protection of individual rights, in the case of pluralism, by a collective contribution to the policy making process. In the same way, a system of separation of powers and 'checks and balances' are also key to the pluralistic protection of the individual.

  2. How have political sociologist understood globalization? Globalization is perhaps the central concept of ...

    (David Held: Globalization does not mean the end of states but rather new forms of power, http://www.barcelona.com/2004/eng/common/enviar_amigo2/portada.cfm?plantilla=pl_noticias&idNoticia, 26/07/2004) Within this approximate intangible theoretical framework, these theories coordinate with the three developed outlines of globalization; which include 'The World System Theory', 'The World Polity Theory' and 'The World Culture Theory.'

  1. Marxism - political theory

    Unlike most social theories that have implicit assumptions about human nature, Marx elaborates a concept of human nature that also informed his view of how society should look. An important factor in this is Marx's ideas about labor. By objectifying our ideas and satisfying our needs, labor both expresses our human nature and changes it.

  2. Extent of key political ideas in directly influencing change and development .

    was unable to take advantage of the massive growth in trade union organisation. Furthermore, the increasingly strong labour movement remained pragmatic, with little ideological interest, seeking the improvements, which were practically possible in a social and political system that allowed for gradual and peaceful change.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work