• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast pluralist and ruling elites accounts of political power

Extracts from this document...


Compare and Contrast pluralist and ruling elites accounts of political power. Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of power can be looked at from both a different and similar perspective. Each approach has its own take on power with elitist believing a small group rule while pluralists believe a diverse range exercise power. The basic assumption of the Ruling elites is that in every society there is and must be a minority which rules over the rest of society. An elite is described as being " those individuals who have the highest indices of excellence in any particular power." Dunleavy and O'leary (1987). In short the power elite theory "claims that a single elite, not a multiplicity of competing groups, decides the life-and-death issues for the nation as a whole" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/APGOV_Power_Elite.htm) Paerto described government from the ruling elite view point as "a governing elite compromising individuals who directly or indirectly play some considerable part in government and a non governing elite compromising the rest" (cited in ruling elites*) Basically some people have power and can influence government and governmental decisions, while others cannot. Mosca notes that the elite and the non elite are not just a feature in developed nations but "In all societies from societies that are very meagrely ...read more.


IF we look at membership to these groups we can see that pluralism aims to " maximise the freedom and the power of all social groups" (Jones, Bill; Kavanagh, Denis; Moran, Micheal; Norton, Phillip,: 2001). Which is in complete contrast to the elitists are only concerned with their group and its preservation. A ruling elite can only be replaced with another elite so we get the "circulation of elites" Paerto. As pluralists emphasize that "power is not a physical entity which individuals either have or not" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com /APGOV_Pluralism.htm it means leaders are chosen and created, they can be anybody. Elite members are broadly "born into prominent families" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com /APGOV_Power_Elite.htm so membership is broadly closed . So while pluralist groups are constantly changing and are open, the elites believe that it is only the elites and new elites who will be able to demonstrate power and be in the influential minority. Elitists pay particular attention to the state as this is the highest "elite" there is, where a pluralists avoid talking about that it exists and think that citizens have no obligation or tie to follow what the state says. They figure that the "mass public controls its governments, and politics have less to do with Parliaments.......and more to do with election, party competition and interest group activity" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com /APGOV_Pluralism.htm which introduces an important topic; Collaboration vs. ...read more.


Pluralists later realized that citizens do not and cannot directly control policy making in polyarchies, they also state that "many people are neither active nor very interest in politics" which agrees with Dahls quote "man is not a political animal" (both Dunleavy and O'leary: 1987) state that Pluralists often accept sociological functionalist views such as the idea that "societies are becoming increasingly complex.....so....social rules and institutions are progressively more specialised" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com /APGOV_Pluralism.htm.) Surely if there is an increased specialisation in areas in society this is a form of elitism. Not everyone in any given area will be specialist so some have more knowledge or power than others and thus there is an elite, as those with knowledge have power so we are "dominated" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com) in some form. The ultimate similarity however is that neo pluralism accepted that there was a "stronger role for government....and [showed an] explicit recognition of the disproportionate power of some groups" (Jones, Bill; Kavanagh, Denis; Moran, Micheal; Norton, Phillip: 2001). Finally Pluralism is closer to the elite way of thinking than first emerges, as "Schumpeter and Dahl [key players in Pluralism]...refashioned pluralism into a theory of elitist democracy" (Dr. Douglas Jaenicke and Prof Michael Moran:2005-2006:Study Sheets). Which synthesizes parts of the 2 approaches to create the term "pluralist elitism". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    It does mean, however, that organizational change is extraordinarily difficult to carry off, given the magnitude of inertial forces (Kaufman 1981). The budget process and goal displacement in the public/political sphere are additional factors that impinge on an orientation to action.

  2. Compare and contrast some of the ways in which major political thinkers have tried ...

    The social contract according to Rousseau presents a collection of independent citizens in the community with high moral value. In trying to draw the boundary between authority of the state and the individual freedom Rousseau uses the notion of ideal social contract in comparison with the civil society (corrupt and unequal)

  1. Liberalism Notes

    * 'Philosopher radicals' (or utilitarians) such as Bentham were in touch with progressive Whigs; Whitbread and Brougham constituted the progressive wing of the parl. party. Cobbett's radical populism harked back to pre-industrial age; Bright (Quaker manufacturer) belonged to new generation of post 1832 MPs - himself displaced by new breed

  2. Even in the 21st Century There are Grounds for Arguing that Governments are Dominated ...

    With political theorists suggesting that the cabinet is losing its power and the Prime Minister gaining it to the point of being presidential it can be said that in the UK at least the government is being dominated by a smaller and smaller elite.

  1. Political Power

    Anna could have made this deal without exerting power if Ben did not know the real value. This argument of power as a decision-making does often make sense in tripartite political system where a number of different parties exercise their influence on controversial issues.

  2. What are the dilemmas of a pluralist democracy?

    However, critically this could lead to the fragmentation of power as seen in the US where the President has continually been unable to implement election policy due to contest from congress. However, principally there is a diverse range of overlapping interest groups within a pluralist state, all seeking political influence.

  1. Compare and contrast Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of political power.

    For pluralism, a minority rule is required, where there is a coalition of all the diverse minority interests in the socially diverse society. Social Diversity helps to create what are known as "Cross-cutting cleavages", which will reduce political conflict, as opponents in politics, will soon become allies, and allies become

  2. Assess the view that most power in modern western societies is held by people ...

    Weber defined 3 types of authority: Charismatic Authority (The type of authority based on charisma), Traditional Authority (The type of power based on established customs) and Rational-legal authority (The type of authority devised from impersonal rules). Weber saw rational-legal authority as the dominant form of authority in modern societies, not only armies but also political, religious and educational organisations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work