• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast pluralist and ruling elites accounts of political power

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and Contrast pluralist and ruling elites accounts of political power. Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of power can be looked at from both a different and similar perspective. Each approach has its own take on power with elitist believing a small group rule while pluralists believe a diverse range exercise power. The basic assumption of the Ruling elites is that in every society there is and must be a minority which rules over the rest of society. An elite is described as being " those individuals who have the highest indices of excellence in any particular power." Dunleavy and O'leary (1987). In short the power elite theory "claims that a single elite, not a multiplicity of competing groups, decides the life-and-death issues for the nation as a whole" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/APGOV_Power_Elite.htm) Paerto described government from the ruling elite view point as "a governing elite compromising individuals who directly or indirectly play some considerable part in government and a non governing elite compromising the rest" (cited in ruling elites*) Basically some people have power and can influence government and governmental decisions, while others cannot. Mosca notes that the elite and the non elite are not just a feature in developed nations but "In all societies from societies that are very meagrely ...read more.

Middle

IF we look at membership to these groups we can see that pluralism aims to " maximise the freedom and the power of all social groups" (Jones, Bill; Kavanagh, Denis; Moran, Micheal; Norton, Phillip,: 2001). Which is in complete contrast to the elitists are only concerned with their group and its preservation. A ruling elite can only be replaced with another elite so we get the "circulation of elites" Paerto. As pluralists emphasize that "power is not a physical entity which individuals either have or not" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com /APGOV_Pluralism.htm it means leaders are chosen and created, they can be anybody. Elite members are broadly "born into prominent families" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com /APGOV_Power_Elite.htm so membership is broadly closed . So while pluralist groups are constantly changing and are open, the elites believe that it is only the elites and new elites who will be able to demonstrate power and be in the influential minority. Elitists pay particular attention to the state as this is the highest "elite" there is, where a pluralists avoid talking about that it exists and think that citizens have no obligation or tie to follow what the state says. They figure that the "mass public controls its governments, and politics have less to do with Parliaments.......and more to do with election, party competition and interest group activity" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com /APGOV_Pluralism.htm which introduces an important topic; Collaboration vs. ...read more.

Conclusion

Pluralists later realized that citizens do not and cannot directly control policy making in polyarchies, they also state that "many people are neither active nor very interest in politics" which agrees with Dahls quote "man is not a political animal" (both Dunleavy and O'leary: 1987) state that Pluralists often accept sociological functionalist views such as the idea that "societies are becoming increasingly complex.....so....social rules and institutions are progressively more specialised" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com /APGOV_Pluralism.htm.) Surely if there is an increased specialisation in areas in society this is a form of elitism. Not everyone in any given area will be specialist so some have more knowledge or power than others and thus there is an elite, as those with knowledge have power so we are "dominated" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com) in some form. The ultimate similarity however is that neo pluralism accepted that there was a "stronger role for government....and [showed an] explicit recognition of the disproportionate power of some groups" (Jones, Bill; Kavanagh, Denis; Moran, Micheal; Norton, Phillip: 2001). Finally Pluralism is closer to the elite way of thinking than first emerges, as "Schumpeter and Dahl [key players in Pluralism]...refashioned pluralism into a theory of elitist democracy" (Dr. Douglas Jaenicke and Prof Michael Moran:2005-2006:Study Sheets). Which synthesizes parts of the 2 approaches to create the term "pluralist elitism". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the pluralist, elitist and Marxist theories of the state.

    For pluralist thinkers, the State is considered to be a form of regulation between the various sectional interests that exist in society. In this respect, the State is seen to mediate between various interests, promoting compromise between competing groups where possible and generally attempting to take a long-term view of social development.

  2. Liberalism Notes

    * Out of office, 1783-1830, so able to proclaim continued attachment to 'peace, retrenchment and reform' - unsuccessful parl. Reform bills, 1797 and 1810. Some credit claimed for abolition of slave trade, while traditional Whig demand for religious toleration reaffirmed in support for Catholic emancipation.

  1. Compare and contrast Pluralist and Ruling Elite accounts of political power.

    For pluralism, a minority rule is required, where there is a coalition of all the diverse minority interests in the socially diverse society. Social Diversity helps to create what are known as "Cross-cutting cleavages", which will reduce political conflict, as opponents in politics, will soon become allies, and allies become

  2. To what extent did the key political ideas directly Influence change and development in ...

    The police state was everything, harsh discipline and economic limitations had to be imposed for success purposes. The government had total power, citizens were basically a tool of the state, used for work and as a catalyst to reach the utopian goal.

  1. What are the dilemmas of a pluralist democracy?

    However, critically this could lead to the fragmentation of power as seen in the US where the President has continually been unable to implement election policy due to contest from congress. However, principally there is a diverse range of overlapping interest groups within a pluralist state, all seeking political influence.

  2. Assess the view that most power in modern western societies is held by people ...

    Weber defined 3 types of authority: Charismatic Authority (The type of authority based on charisma), Traditional Authority (The type of power based on established customs) and Rational-legal authority (The type of authority devised from impersonal rules). Weber saw rational-legal authority as the dominant form of authority in modern societies, not only armies but also political, religious and educational organisations.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Comparing the 1999 and 1995 elections, there were approximately 500 fewer candidates competing in the single-member district contests than had run in 1995. This reduction was at the expense of party participation since the number of independent candidates rose slightly in 1999.

  2. The Evolving Shape of Elite Politics

    have given rise to issues of social justice. These demands are represented by millions of workers and farmers rather than (as in the past) a small group of intellectuals. In the 1980's there were two political choices, conservatism and reform.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work