• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast Positive and Negative Conceptions of Liberty.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and Contrast Positive and Negative Conceptions of Liberty Although it is one of the most used words in political vocabulary, there is no fully satisfying definition of liberty. This has led to philosophers and politicians defining freedom as that of which they approve1. Rousseau proclaimed the 'the mere impulse of appetite is slavery, whilst obedience to the law which we prescribe ourselves is liberty'2, whereas Locke describes it simply as 'the power a man has to do or forbear any particular action'3. Liberty is also often interchangeable with the word 'freedom' - although efforts have been made to differentiate between the two ideals, no convincing separation has been made. Distinguishing between positive and negative liberty can be dated back to at least Kant, but Isaiah Berlin was first to examine the idea in depth. The most popular definition of liberty is that of Isaiah Berlin, whose essay 'Two Concepts of Liberty' (1969) gave rise to the ideas of 'positive' and 'negative' liberty. Put simply, negative liberty is freedom 'from' whilst positive liberty is freedom 'to'. ...read more.


Negative freedom is interested in interference from external forces such as the state, whereas positive liberty concerns itself with factors that are internal. This gives rise to the question of whether positive freedom is in fact a political issue or one that is more concerned with psychology, and in turn the question of whether it is possible for positive freedom to be thought of in political terms. Those who answer 'no' obviously advocate negative liberty, but those who answer 'yes' believe that it is possible for positive liberty to be promoted through political action. Theorists who defend the political idea of positive liberty include Rousseau, Hegel, Marx and T.H. Green. Positive liberty in its political form is general though of to be a collective idea. Rousseau's theory of freedom states that individual freedom can only be achieved through participation. By each person participating, the community as a whole is self controlled in accordance with a 'general will'. He argues that a democratic society is essentially free as it is self determined. ...read more.


Advocators of negative liberty are able to avoid this line of reason by denying any kind of relationship between one''s freedom and desires. . Berlin once stated: "Total liberty can be dreadful, total equality can be equally frightful." All those doctrines which define liberty as self-realization and then prescribe what this is, end up by defending liberty's opposite. To the perennial human problems there are no final answers. "Liberty is liberty, not equality or fairness or justice or human happiness or a quiet conscience." Liberal governments should recognize that all political values must end up in conflict, and all conflicts require negotiation. Liberalism has contained thinkers from both camps - those who advocate the concept of negative liberty e.g. Oppenheim (1981), Miller (1983) and Steiner (1994) , and those who support the negative concept e.g. Milne (1968), Gibbs (1976) and Christman (1991)8. 1 'Politics, The Basics' Second Edition, Stephen D Tansey, 2000, p 65 - 66 2 'The Social Contract', Rousseau, p16 3 'Essay', Locke, Book II, Ch.xxi, p15 4 'Two Concepts of Liberty', Isaiah Berlin, [1958] 1969 5 'Two Concepts of Liberty', Isaiah Berlin, [1958]1969 6 'Two Concepts of Liberty', Isaiah Berlin, 1969, 132-133 7 'Two Concepts of Liberty', Isaiah Berlin, 1969, p132 - 133 8 http://www.seop.leeds.ac.uk/archives/spr2003/entries/liberties-positive-negative ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    rights, that is, out of the need for protection of the privacy of property, could not manifest itself publicly through excessive social control. Perhaps Locke's idea is better explained this way. "From privacy of possession, publicity of sovereignty does not follow...'no Man could ever have a just Power over the

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign. (Mill, On Liberty, Chapter 1) Implications of the Harm Principle: This principle is the primary source of Mill's theory of rights.

  1. Distinguish between negative and positive freedom and explain the implications of each for the ...

    The sate is seen as an enabling state, which places necessary constraints upon the individuals to allow them to grow and develop their unequal talents, without hindering others in the process.

  2. Compare and contrast the concepts of Anomie and Alienation.

    production, in which neither labour itself, the tools, product, or the co-operation nature of work, are owned and controlled by the worker. Durkheim thought that anomie is the consequence of the division of labour and that it is still possible for society to maintain a collective conscience.

  1. Photomontage in Berlin, A critical study of the capitals inter-war artwork

    The image has three clear composites, taking up a specific area of the picture. Previous photomontages by Heartfield were much more erratic and Dada like, with lots of objects in a muddle together. This showed the potential for Photomontage in politics.

  2. Compare and contrast the different ways in which organisations seek to control individual employees ...

    This view was an expansion on that of Dahl who looked at a process where an individual was simply overruled, but still took part in the process. Bachrach & Baratz's view posed the question of a person being removed from the process.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work