• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare Hobbes and Locke's views on the obligation to obey the law.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐BARBADOS COMMUNTIY COLLEGE DIVISION OF COMMERCE DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT AND POLITICAL STUDIES ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN ARTS GOVERNMENT AND POLITICAL STUDIES GOVT 100: INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL THOUGHT AND ANALYSIS Compare Hobbes and Locke?s views on the obligation to obey the law. October 15, 2012 The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) is best known for his political thought, and deservedly so. His vision of the world is strikingly original and still relevant to contemporary politics. His main concern is the problem of social and political order: how human beings can live together in peace and avoid the danger and fear of civil conflict. He poses stark alternatives: we should give our obedience to an unaccountable sovereign (a person or group empowered to decide every social and political issue). Otherwise what awaits us is a ?state of nature? that closely resembles civil war a situation of universal insecurity, where all have reason to fear violent death and where rewarding human cooperation is all but impossible. John Locke (1632?1704) is among the most influential political philosophers of the modern period. In the Two Treatises of Government, he defended the claim that men are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch. ...read more.


We might say that as long as someone has attitudinally consented to a state (and the majority attitudinally consent to the present kind of state) then that person has consented to this kind of state and so is obligated. But how do you know whether in a given society people do attitudinally consent in the way required? You would have to be able to look into their hearts. Also, political obligation would last only as long as the attitudinal consent so would be precarious, and would not apply at all to e.g. anarchists, since they lack the necessary attitudinal consent. Yet Locke wants to demonstrate that all citizens are under a moral obligation to obey the law, not just some. (this is a fundamental problem for all consent theories, for if consent is voluntary then there must be the possibility that some will not consent, in which case those people will not be under political obligation.) So instead Locke argues that tacitly consented. Locke?s argument is effectively, that anyone who remains in the country tacitly consents (by omission) to the laws, because they have chosen not to emigrate. The standard critique of Locke?s argument: the background moral assumption in the argument is that if you consent to do something then you are under a moral obligation to do it (like a promise). ...read more.


Both of the two men?s philosophies included religion Hobbes and Locke both acknowledged the existence of God. Beyond this, both agreed that God played only a small part in the foundation of their philosophies. Each of these men had an impact on the world around them, and the people to come later on in the world. Hobbes influenced the people of his own time by refuting England?s parliament and France?s papal system. In the same way, Locke affected the revolutionists of the United States. Locke?s idea of a people run government held a great influence over the United States Declaration of Independence, Federalist Papers, and Constitution. Both philosophers impacted others, but the way in which they impacted them varied. Although these two philosophers disagreed upon certain subjects, they did occasionally agree with one another. Locke believed that government should base itself on the people, while Hobbes said that only a king should reign; yet they agreed that someone should rule over a country. Philosophically, Hobbes suggested that people needed controlling like animals in order to survive, while Locke thought that people had to experience something in order to understand it; yet again, they both believed in God, but they had little use for Him. Hobbes influenced the people in and around his time period, while Locke influenced people a few decades later but both men did influence the political and philosophical notions of their time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. A Comparison of Marx's and Rousseau's Philosophies.

    Since civil government without religion is an impossibility, he wanted the replacement of Chiristianity with a civil religion which is a civil profession of faith. From Marx 's point of view, "relion is opium of the people" and it is only conglomeration of false and fantastic statements which science has condemned.

  2. Can feminism be thought of as a theory of law or, otherwise, fundamental in ...

    particularly in the 20th Century these can be clearly highlighted by looking at the actions of the suffragettes in 1910, which illustrate a more active approach to campaigning. As previously mentioned feminist legal theories are a contemporary concept, for this reason a "radical new methodology in legal theory" is required

  1. Nigeria Country Study

    An integrated petrochemical industry was also a priority. Nigeria's refineries operated at less than optimal rates throughout the 1990s. By the beginning of the 2000s, the government was more concerned about halting corruption and reigning in the state budget than economic development.

  2. Compare the views about the nature and development of Carl Rogers and George Kelly. ...

    Kelly also left many unanswered questions on his theory of personality, such as why people have more construct systems available to them than others and what the origin of the personal construct is (Winter, 1996). Without this knowledge, it may be difficult for a therapist to understand and correctly diagnose this 18 year old client.

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    I also have far more information about my own situation and the peculiar circumstances that I am in at any given time. So, it would seem to be reasonable that the government would trust my judgment about what it is best for me to do in matters which involve only my own interests.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    When God gave the world to man, he also gave man reason to make the best use out of it. "The earth, and all that is therein, is given to men for the support and comfort of their being(Locke, 18)."

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    In return, Yeltsin often undermined party cohesion by exerting influence on individual leaders through such means as control over the allocation of the perks of legislative office. Putin currently enjoys much greater party support in the Duma, but he is still not accountable to them for his actions.

  2. Deontology- a theory based purely on obligation or duty.

    Through the enforcement of this aspect of deontology, justice is upheld, whereas, consequentialism totally undermines any such dealings other than the greater good based on the outcomes or consequences of the situation. Immanuel Kant, in realizing the inconsistencies within the consquentialist theory, began to formulate the ideas for the theory mentioned and briefly defined above, deontology.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work