• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare the Marxist approach to Religion with the Weberian.

Extracts from this document...


Sociology Religion Annabelle Atkinson "Compare the Marxist approach to Religion with the Weberian." Karl Marx believed that people's religious beliefs reflect their alienation. In pre - socialised societies, people are in a alienated relationships with their work, with the products of their work and each other. Religious beliefs therefore arise in a response to, and as a protest against, people's lack of control of their destiny and their dehumanisation and oppression. In Marx's view, religion is the self - consciousness and self - feeling of man who has either not found himself or has already lost himself again. He believes therefore that if the alienation and exploitation associated with social classes is eradicated religion will no longer be needed and cease to exist. This argument can be developed in a number of ways. First, religion distorts reality by encouraging the belief that people are dependent upon supernatural forces. This means that because events are out of our control there is little people can do apart from trying to influence these powers through prayer or sacrifice. In this way religion obscures the human responsibility for social inequality and thereby discourages the realisation that working for social change may be possible. ...read more.


He considered that the underlying principle behind modernisation is rational, scientific thought - the use of the most effective means to achieve given ends. Applied to technology and to organisation, rational thought has restructured the social world. Equally to the point, applied to the human race's understanding of itself and its place in the social universe, rational thought has undermined religion and replaced it with various secular and, largely, materialistic explanations of our existence and relationship to nature. Loss of intellectual authority and status has helped and will continue to erode the moral authority of the church. However, both see this change differently. Marx views the decline of religion as a positive change. He argued that the proletariat will see through the fog of bourgeois ideology and become revolutionary. He goes onto claim that the proletariat's revolution will be made by the majority. This will enable a classless society to be formed in which the ideals put forward in the French Revolution will be fully realised: freedom will replace oppression; fulfilment alienation; equality inequality; fraternity self - interest. Marx called such a society communism. ...read more.


Weber's main theoretical point is that ideas can change history, and in doing so can contribute to changes in the material context of life. It will be remembered that the whole trend of Marx's analysis of religious ideas is in the opposite direction. He sees them as primarily as justifying existing social and economic circumstances, and certainly not as providing a major source of historical change. Instead he believes religion was an ideological pall intended to obscure new and different ideas. But Marx did recognise that new ideas could be developed. Human consciousness is able to react thoughtfully and creatively to experience, particularly everyday work experience. Socialism itself had to be "thought of" before it could become a reality. However, for Marx, ideas are formed within, and structured by socio - economic material reality. Socialism can only become possible when society is economically and socially developed to the point where socialist ideas are seen to be realistic. Weber's studies of religion are also important from the methodological point of view. As an exercise in comparative sociology; they rank alongside Durkheim's study of suicide. Weber's conclusion was that the relationship is one of variety. Religion can help to cause change or impede it; it might be used to support the status quo or against it. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    is an acceptance that capitalism is the only effective way to generate wealth, although they maintain that it causes poverty and inequality. Social democrats see capitalism as a necessary evil, and believe the problems caused by the system can be rectified through government intervention.

  2. "What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Marxist histories"?

    Also with competition, came the desire of the capitalist to increase volume, in the idea of grasping a larger portion of the market. This increased volume of product led to a vicious circle, which includes overproduction, leading to lay-offs, periods of depression and recession.

  1. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    The absence of pain leads you to the mistaken belief that your headache is cured; however you haven't cured the headache. All you've done is use a drug to block out the pain. Therefore, by taking a drug you've removed the symptom, but you have not attacked the cause because

  2. How revolutionary were Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority?

    However Luther fundamentally respects the role of all powers and authorities and believes that it is a biblical principle to respect, acknowledge, follow and obey all secular rulers. Christians therefore cannot claim to only follow Christ and disobey secular authorities.

  1. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    "Finding no meaning in their working lives, they become obsessed with material possessions and work harder and harder in order to acquire more and more." (Tovey & Share, 2000:12) This statement supports Marx's view that social change is often materialist.

  2. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    and to organise an international working class movement dedicated to those principles. When the 1848 revolutions broke out he went back to cologne to found the neu rhinischche zeitung. After its suppression in 1849 Marx took refuge in London where he remained for the rest of his life often in considerable poverty.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    They dare not assert directly that the same laborers that have been discharged find situations in new branches of labor. Facts cry out too loudly against this lie. Strictly speaking, they only maintain that new means of employment will be found for other sections of the working class; for example,

  2. An analysis of the Marxist Perspective on Religion

    best understand his critique of religion, it is necessary to first look at his theories of economics. The Bourgeoisie (the upper class) control the Proletariat through the inequality they create in capitalism. As it is in the best interests of the Bourgeoisie to continue to hold the majority of the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work