• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Conservatsim favours pragmatism over principle, discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Conservatism Favours Pragmatism Over Principle.' Discuss Conservatism, like many other political ideologies has many factions within it. Traditional conservatism, especially paternalistic conservatism very much favours a pragmatic approach. This is the belief that behaviour should be shaped in accordance with practical circumstances and goals rather than principles, beliefs or ideological objectives. However with the introduction of the liberal new right conservatism due to the conservative view of economic and social breakdown, things have started to look a lot more ideological and challenged the pragmatic nature of conservatism. Traditional conservatives undoubtedly favour a pragmatic approach rather than stick to the core ideologies of conservatism. Burke famously said 'a state which doesn't change cannot conserve' which perfectly explains the traditional conservative favouritism towards pragmatism. If a government does not change in order to help all aspects of society and bring in some kind of social reforms there will be revolt by the poor of the country. Conservatives hold this belief due to the belief that humans are naturally imperfect and therefore limited intellectually. Society is too complicated for human's to fully understand and can therefore never fully understand the political system. ...read more.

Middle

However, it could still be argued that conservatives only believe in pragmatism in order to keep its key principle of conserving tradition within society. In the mid 70's, a new type of Conservatism was introduced, especially in Thatcher and Reagan's governments in Britain and America. This was a very ideological strand in conservatism with a mixture between neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism, aiming to free markets while keeping society stricter and under more authority. However, the rise of the New Right has weakened conservative pragmatism and introduced a strong emphasis upon ideological conviction and principle. This is most clearly evident in relation to neo-liberal economics which is based upon a consistent and principled belief in the free market and economic individualism. The extent to which principle has displaced pragmatism depends upon the extent to which neo-liberal convictions have displaced traditionalism within conservatism. This therefore challenges the idea that conservatives favour pragmatism over principle. The new-right adopted a stance of absolute economic liberty and free markets, a neo-liberal view on how the economy should be run. ...read more.

Conclusion

The new right therefore believed in social authoritarianism and a strong state to reassert the moral foundations of politics and of society. This would seem to be therefore a very ideological way in which to deal with the both economic and social prosperity which the new right was trying to gain, and therefore a step away from the traditional conservatives view on a pragmatic approach in order to stop breakdown. We can therefore see were conservatism differs hugely and therefore it is hard to say which side is more important and thus favours conservatism as a whole. However, traditional conservatism is likely to use pragmatism within society to stop its breakdown and keep tradition within society. This key theme of the conservative ideology and therefore could be argued that pragmatism is only used to keep the key principles of conservatism. Likewise, the new right was very ideological in order to deal with the social and economic problems of that particular time and therefore it may have been a pragmatic approach to do so. Therefore conservatism favours principle over pragmatism as it seems to only use pragmatism as a way to preserve its key principles. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power promotes pragmatism

    The consequences of this union of political orientation resounded through the succeeding administrations. The contradictorily Federalist-natured domestic and foreign policies enacted by both Jefferson and Madison reflect the plasticity of party ideology, best demonstrated by their treatment of the Louisiana Purchase, the Hamiltonian financial system, the Barbary pirates, and the War of 1812.

  2. Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism?

    to be strangled by it"5 The New Right aroused tension in the party because, unlike Heath, it saw itself as ideological and was wholly unwilling to compromise. Yet, t is crucial to mention, in this context, that compromise had never really been a feature of traditional Conservatism.

  1. Resolved: As a general Principle, individuals have an obligation to value the common good ...

    The goods of national security, the protection of the environment, democratic decision procedures, adequate health care, and also science and education require collective action to produce. Not all societies need the same collective goods but certain goods are essentially of such nature that their production involves a collectivity.

  2. Philosophy Essay - Is it possible to explain human morality by means of just ...

    Morality is trying to draw a distinction between the good and the bad. How does pleasure have to be good? People's pleasure may contain an evil that we all condemn in everyday life. Plato raises the point of having bad pleasures, sadism being the obvious example.

  1. "Fascism is nothing more than an extreme form of Nationalism". Discuss

    Whilst the basic ideas of cultural separation in Nazism can be regarded as nationalistic, the extremity of such fascist action marks it as ideologically separate to nationalism, rather than a strong extension of it, it is racialism rather than just extreme nationalism.

  2. In defining whether Thatcherism was different from conservatism we must first understand which form ...

    By the time of their re-election in 1841 the Tory party had changed its name to the Conservatives and adopted much of the ideology we now refer to as conservatism. The next strong Conservative ministry came with the arrival of Benjamin Disreali in 1874.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work