• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Consider whether the activities of pressure groups help or hinder the operation of a pluralist democracy in the USA.

Extracts from this document...


Consider whether the activities of pressure groups help or hinder the operation of a pluralist democracy in the USA. Interest groups seek to influence decision makers in to vote in a way that benefit's the group's interests such as the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the American Medical Association (AMA). The US is a pluralist democracy which means that there is more than one centre of power, this means that there are many access points that interest groups can target. Many interest groups have offices on Washington DC's "K Street" giving easy access to the Capitol which is the centre of US Federal Government. There are varying views on interest groups and their effects on democracy, the main viewpoints are those of pluralists, neo-elitists and elitists. The Pluralists are of the opinion that interest groups are good for society and act as a safety valve, as expressed by Robert Dahl in his book "Who Governs". Interest groups allow groups of people who share the same ideals to come together and act towards furthering their views and representing those without representation, be it through disenfranchisement, lack of awareness or the dominance of another social group within their Congressional District/State (Their elected representative is not representative of them). The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) ...read more.


Board of Education (1957) and supported the Civil Rights Movement throughout the 1950's and 1960's, eventually leading to the Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Voting Rights Act (1965). Common Cause is dedicated to "...ensuring that government and political processes serve the general interest, rather than special interests..." and has supported greater transparency in campaign finance, backing the Federal Election Campaign Act (1971) and the McCain/Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (2002). 2000 and 2004 Presidential Candidate, Ralph Nader, is an active automobile safety campaigner, having taken on General Motor's over the unsafeness of their Corvair model. Further campaigning also led to the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (1966) and the creation of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Despite the evidence above of the good those interest groups do, Elitists, believe differently, as demonstrated by C. Wright Mills in "The Power Elite"; "a small elite with interconnected interests govern America and powerful and wealthy interest groups dominate decision making." Meanwhile, Neo-Elitists view Pluralists as na�ve, stating that interest groups use their influence to shape public opinion by arguing that their interests coincide with basic American values (Individualism). For them, the political system isn't open to all, only those who have the resources and influence can set up a group that is truly effective, therefore excluding the poor and vulnerable at the expense of the powerful and wealthy groups who are an unrepresentative minority. ...read more.


Interest groups can also be seen as selfish, sectional interests often with no regard for others or, indeed, the common good. This certainly applies to economic interests, large businesses or corporations who can afford everything needed to successfully extend their views to the decision makers, leading to distortion of policy and the frustration of important measures. Oil and Gas industries attacked and killed off Carter's Energy Bill, influencing the Congressional committees to vote against it. More recently, large scale polluters have ensured that the US hasn't met their Kyoto Treaty obligations. Interest groups supporting those without representation have certainly had their successes, NAACP and Civil Rights, which have helped the operation of the US's pluralist democracy; but their progress was painstakingly slow. The NAACP spent over 60 years fighting for civil rights for African Americans and even when the first legislation passed it wasn't sufficient and was ignored by many who mattered. Wealthy and powerful groups enjoy more effective and rapid success in gaining their aims; they have access to the decision makers and have the money to influence them. Unfortunately, money often has a greater bearing on people's decisions rather than their conscience, which sets back greatly those without the means of doing similar. The fight between interest groups is staged upon an uneven playing field with those who represent the minority influencing the decisions that govern the majority, most definitely a hindrance to the operation of a democracy. ?? ?? ?? ?? Conor Slater 2.36 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. US pressures groups are undemocratic, discuss

    Furthermore, they are able to scrutinise and hold government to account in the implementation of policies, to try to ensure that promises are fulfilled, policies are delivered and regulations enforced. Indeed in legal terms, the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured people (NAACP)

  2. Consider whether the activities of pressure groups help or hinder the operation of a ...

    It is therefore up to pressure groups to ensure that the views of the minority of members, which may, in fact, be a representation of the majority of the electorate, to campaign for them. On face value, then, pressure groups appear to be immeasurably helpful in the operation of pluralist democracy in the US.

  1. Using Suetonius and Res Gestae, assess how effective Octavian was in enlisting Senatorial Support ...

    needed to vote a candidate into office. Therefore the Senators had a need to please the public. The Latin phrase "Senatus Populusque Romanus" (the Senate and the People of Rome) sums this point up. Octavian needed to please the public, so he could give the senators high positions, and keep them under check.

  2. Does public participation in the presidential nomination process advance or hinder democracy?

    million in matching funds and George W Bush raised 491.3 million, Elizabeth Dole pulled out before the primaries saying that the ?money had become the message?. This is undemocratic as it denies many candidates an even race simply because they aren?t as high profile.

  1. Is the USA still a federal state?

    These routine checks contrast to the national standard for immigration control. Therefore states do not remain submissive to solely accept when policy contravenes their standards or when it appears to be lacking. Finally big government is not always a definitive feature of the federal state.

  2. How far do you agree the USA remains a global hegemony today?

    threat even though it is the only regional hegemon in recent years. History has shown that past potential hegemons have all been defeated because of a rising counter balance of nations formed against them. They have all been perceived as a threat to international security.

  1. Ethnic minorities in the USA

    He opposed this on moral and religious grounds, as did many of his supporters. There are also checks and balances by both Congress and the Supreme Court on the powers of the President. Congress can overturn a Presidential veto if it has a two-thirds majority in both Houses.

  2. Evaluate the impact and effectiveness of interest groups in US politics.

    Alternatively another impact of interest groups is that they increase the amount of opportunities for American citizens to become involved in the political process between elections, due to the fact that in the US participation in politics is seen as a virtue.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work