• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Constitutional Comparison

Extracts from this document...


��ࡱ�>�� ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� - !"#$%&'()*+,-./012������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������Root Entry���������Z� ��� �O�2��J �K�3�CONTENTS���� `CompObj������������VSPELLING���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Magna Carta, written in 1215 forms a major part of the constitution of Britain, as does Bagehot s English Constitution, published in 1867 and the power reducing Parliament Act of 1911. Furthermore, more modern additions to the constitution are written, such as the Human Rights Act (1998) which is also a European law. However, the US constitution also has several unwritten elements, known as constitutional silences . An example of a constitutional silence is the use of judicial review, whereby the courts can declare actions of the other branches (executive and legislative, in state or federal levels) as unconstitutional. The case of Marlbury vs. Madison established this right of judicial review, but it is otherwise not written in the constitution itself. Another example of a constitutional silence is the two main political parties; The Democrats and The Republicans. The two parties are central to the operation of American Politics but are unobserved within the constitution. Other important constitutional silences are the use of pressure groups, such as the National Rifle Association, and the use of the ever contentious Electoral College. There are also several aspects of the UK constitution that are unwritten, and these are conventions . Some of these conventions include that the Prime Minister will be chosen from the party in the House of Commons with the greatest majority, the idea of individual and collective responsibility within the Premiership and the Cabinet. ...read more.


It also helps citizens to be aware of their rights and freedoms, and many Americans can quote the constitution as a defence of their liberties, something which British citizens are much less aware of which can lead to the government taking advantage. Furthermore, a codified constitution acts as a check on the institutions of the government, decisions are likely to made with the view in mind to remain constitutional to avoid public reaction. Another interesting advantage of a codified constitution is that it has a strongly positive educational role - Americans are taught to treat it with a sense of reverence and respect, and it helps to create a shared values and culture for all citizens. With restrictions on the President being a prevalent issue in America, a further benefit of their codified constitution is that it is very hard to amend, so the President cannot bend it to his will whenever he wishes, whereas in the UK a simple majority vote in Parliament can enable the Prime Minister to pass legislation effecting constitutional change. The main disadvantages of the codified constitution mainly focus on the issue of amendment; the written constitution of the US can be too inflexible to adapt to the requirements of the time. A strong argument proving its downfall is the controversial gun laws stated in the Bill of Rights - many Presidents have tried to eliminate the Right to Bear Arms amendment but because of its rigidity are unable to. ...read more.


However, this term is misleading as the powers are not necessarily separated, but divided and shared. The idea of separation of personnel is far more accurate when describing the three branches division; no person can work in any more than one branch of government at a time; President Elect Barack Obama had to sacrifice his job as Senator in order to be able to accept his impending Presidency. Richard Neustadt summaries this idea well: The constitutional convention of 1787 is said to have created a government of separated powers& rather it set up a government of separated institutions sharing powers . The UK however has a Fusion of powers whereby all of the government departments work together to create legislation and discuss issues, a parliamentary government that is characterised by the executive that runs in and through the legislature . Overall, when comparing the US and UK constitutions the differences that run through them general are direct opposites, codified and uncodified, rigid and flexible, separated and fused. Despite this, both have proved very effective so far in history and have survived to be the oldest written and non written constitutions in the world. an anything else. This is evident when Prohibition |~�"-" - �"~!�!(r)&�&<1>18-8ZA\ALL�V�V�Y'Y"Y-Y�Y�Y�������������������������1/4"1/4"(2�"'(� %<( KxP ,12�"'(� �) @�S 1 1 ~�"�Y�Y'Y"Y-Y�Y�Y��j�PL,L,L "$� 08$� 082 "�$�$ 08�0 "�$�$ 08�4 "�-$�$ 08� �(TSH����B�(TSH:. "�" $����� "tt�YZ�Y\>�(ONT,Times New RomanTahoma��+ " " "F�� �"�"�Ä" 'S "wy"�` "�`""A."@���"�"�" 'S "wy"�` "�`"."-"Ks"�#�"gi"gi llows t�� �����Z� ��� �O�2�Quill96 Story Group Class�����9�q ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the view that the arguments for having an electoral college to elect the ...

    5 star(s)

    Truly, this is a two party system! However, the 1968 election paints a different picture. George Wallace (also running as an independent) only gained 13% of the popular vote, far below that Perot would gain 24 years later, however he managed to claim almost 50 ECVs and 5 states.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    &amp;quot;The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    Britain is a unitary state rather than a Federal one like in the US. In a unitary state, power lies with central government. But this is less so since devolution, which has distributed some power to Wales and Scotland, thus, removing power from Westminster.

  1. How well does the US Constitution Work

    With respect to Checks and Balances Constitutional powers were limited to the Supreme Court. Judicial review on the contrary continues to be one the most powerful checks present. The Founding Fathers in order to prevent the wrongful electing of political groups to branches of the government, in particular, the legislature and executive branches.

  2. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    UK law must not contravene the E.C.H.R, in much the same way the Supreme Court must deem that USA law 'constitutional', but these institutions rarely have to intervene, (although the Supreme Court revoked the Flag Desecration Act for being unconstitutional)

  1. The British Constitution

    In contrast the House of Lords perform important functions, complementary to, not different from, the House of Commons. It can provide a different subject viewpoint, and act as a brake on the House of Commons. The separation of powers in the USA is a fundamental constitutional principle.

  2. Discuss the arguments for and against a codified constitution

    A codified constitution would describe and entrench the structure of government, the relationship between different parts of government and the relationship between government and citizens. So it would therefore prevent arbitrary government. An introduction of a codified constitution would protect the rights of the citizens.

  1. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    There is an emphasis on the separation of powers within the US constitution. The UK constitution does not create this separation of powers. Although in the UK the judiciary is largely independent, members of the executive are members of parliament making them indirectly part of the legislative branch.

  2. US politics.The constitutional system of checks and balances does not work in practice. Discuss.

    President. However the powers that the president may actually possess have alternatives to it and can be overridden by the legislature therefore there may be checks present in theory but in practice they are somewhat limited.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work