• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Could one censor pornography, on Millean grounds?

Extracts from this document...


Could one censor pornography, on Millean grounds? For years the censorship of pornography has been heavily debated, with philosophers like Mill commonly being quoted. Although Mill does not specifically refer to pornography in his work he gives a variety of principles, all of which are open to interpretation, by which we can come to conclusions on censorship. Views on censorship mainly depend on the harm or offence it causes and what kind of pornography is being considered. Pornography ranges from hardcore to soft, involving consenting adults on one hand and on the other hand forcing children to participate in it. Similarly some viewers simply look at it and it has no other effect on them except to "stimulate sexual excitement"1. However it is claimed that some pornography depicts a degrading picture of women and in some cases has incited men to use violence against women. In my essay I shall outline what Mill stated concerning freedom of action, spend some time defining and explaining pornography and then link the two, showing both arguments for and against censorship of pornography on Millean grounds. J.S.Mill is often referred to as the founding father of modern liberalism particularly due to his emphasis on freedom of speech and action and minimal government interference so as to maximise human development. ...read more.


Many would even go as far to say that there is no such thing as a self-regarding act as "no action, however intimate, is free from social consequences"10. Therefore as pornography does have consequences on society, most of which people believe are bad, it should be censored. One could also argue that Mill being a utilitarian would censor pornography as it does not bring happiness and therefore is a wrong action. Ryan admits that "the utilitarian must admit there will be cases where people are made happier by giving them less freedom rather than more"11 and therefore censoring pornography might be right. However Mill believes that we all search for a higher truth in our actions in regard to mortality and that is why they should not be interfered with as it is an "invasion of liberty which thwarts the development of human individuality"12. Pornography, though, is not about great moral and philosophical truths, does not help individuals develop and has no real value except to satisfy people's base lusts in life. Therefore as it is a lower physical pleasure, perhaps one can argue that Mill would censor it as it is not beneficial to society's progress. ...read more.


And this would mean the state would start to claim to be "an infallible guide on such matters"22 which is dangerous. Thus many like Brannon Miller believe that Mill would not support censoring because "informal sanctions of society"23 and "oppressive legal controls"24 would inhibit people's individual liberty. And if the government is given a freer hand in interfering with society in more trivial issues such as pornography it might then lead to further interference in more important issues in society. There is also the minor issue that it would be very hard for a government to censor pornography today due to the most common medium being the Internet, which is extremely difficult to control. Although personally I would myself censor pornography and perhaps even ban it given half a chance, I have to agree that from reading Mill, on his grounds you probably would not censor pornography. This would mainly be because it does not fulfil his principle of interference if there is harm and I do agree that he is referring to direct harm rather than "potential harm"25, however narrow that view may be. Censoring pornography would restrict people's liberty to act as they please and also curtail the happiness of those who find enjoyment in the baser, lower pleasures of life. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Explain Bentham's version of Utilitarianism.

    I.e., at the time the president of the united states believed that what he was doing was right when he agreed to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, he believed he was doing it for his country, however the truly horrifying affects of his decision could only be known afterwards

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    away to ensure other people their positive rights, so you cannot grant those positive rights in the first place. Of course, the government will be allowed to take money from citizen to provide the basic services of society such as civil protection, national defense, and other essential services - and

  1. John Stuart Mill was the son of a philosopher who worked with Jeremy Bentham. ...

    When determining what to do in a given situation, the circumstances as well as the consequences can change. Also the majority is not always right, so both viewpoints should be considered. As well as this no allowance is made for personal relationships such as the situation of who to save

  2. What are the main features of utilitarianism as an ethical theory (10) Examine and ...

    except by sacrificing the lives of one, a hundred or more men, Newton would have had the right, would indeed have been duty bound ... to eliminate the dozen or the hundred for the sake of making the discoveries known to the whole of humanity ...

  1. "...the gulf between how one should live and how one does live is so ...

    action: what the ruler does is determined entirely by the context of the situation. Machiavelli tells us that leaders who succeed have 'virtu', or virtue. The successful leader has virtu because he grasps the situation and takes what are contextually the correct actions in order to solve the problem.

  2. What are the advantages of utilitarianism?

    This shows holes in Bentham's hedonic calculus formula, and proves it is not as straightforward as it first appears, and it is certainly questionable whether an action can be determined to be good in the way the calculus suggests. Another problem with Bentham's theory is how to decide which are higher and lower pleasures.

  1. So, whats wrong with Anarchism?

    education by getting better paid jobs in the future as well as doing itself a favour by placing the most able according to skill to the appropriate job. Collectivism is the anarchist movement made popular by Michael Bakunin (1814-1876). This is closest to socialism and some form of it was

  2. Compare Hobbes and Locke's views on the obligation to obey the law.

    Without a leader, the country would fall away into nothing. In the political sense, the two philosophers agreed only on this subject. However, they each believed that a different type of power should reside as supreme. Hobbes thought that only one man, a king, should have the right to govern the people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work