• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically assess the value of the models of Frank, Rostow and Clark-Fisher in our understanding of development issues.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically assess the value of the models of Frank, Rostow and Clark-Fisher in our understanding of development issues. There are a great number of differences between the models of Frank, Rostow and Clark-Fisher. For example, the Clark-Fisher sector model and W.W. Rostow's modernisation theory are merely temporally based models of development. However, Frank's dependency theory contains elements of both temporal and spatial factors. There is also the highly significant division to consider between dependency theories and modernisation theories. Dependency theories are the theories which build upon the idea that the rate of development of a country is largely a consequence of its relationships with other countries. On the other hand, modernisation theories are theories that build upon the idea that the rate of development of a country is largely to do with internal structures, government and culture of that country. According to Frank's dependency theory, countries can become more frequently dependent on powerful colonial powers. He believed that as the more powerful country exploits the resources of the weaker colony, the colony becomes more dependent. Frank in 1971 described the effect of capitalist development on many countries as "the development of underdevelopment". ...read more.

Middle

W.W. Rostow's modernisation theory incorporated five stages through which he believed that all developing societies must pass. His model was put together through his work on the growth of industrialisation in the UK and USA. The five stages of the model are: traditional subsistence economy, preconditions for take-off, take-off to maturity, the drive to maturity and the age of high-mass consumption. These stages can be characterised by limited technology and a static and hierarchical social structure. Despite the fact that Rostow's model was proposed in terms of the national economic unit, he concluded that the development gap was explained due to different countries being at different stages of the model. Rostow was able to present a highly descriptive model of development in which much was left unsaid about how one stage leads to another. Rostow, like Frank, did commit himself to a number of hypotheses. His theory is evolutionist, as it sees social and economic change as unfolding through a fixed set of stages. It is also un-linear because all countries must pass by the same route and in the same order. There can be no leaps, shortcuts, choices or alternative routes to development. ...read more.

Conclusion

This increases the diversity of industry within a country or region. The UK has a good example in the cotton industry as it encourages textile machinery, and service industries. Also, the ability of the Clark-Fisher sector model to interact with other models such as Rostow's modernisation theory, the Demographic Transition Model and Myrdal's cumulative causation can only work in its favour. The problems with the Clark-Fisher sector model are far more easily understood than either of the previous two discussed models. The sector model is highly descriptive and offers only a crude level of analysis. It does not however say how or why a country has developed, and it also does not show the internal variations which can exist within a country. All three of these development models contribute significantly to the understanding and different interpretations of development, in one form or another. However, because of the flaws in each of the three models which have been identified when the models were produced, none of them can claim to be the leading authority on development, and maybe if these models were used in conjunction with further models of development from Wallerstein, Sutcliffe or Friedmann, then they would become more apparently clear. ?? ?? ?? ?? William Cooper ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    But, a viable moral theory should not have such problematic and inconsistent prescriptions. The hard problem comes in the following form. It could be the case that utilitarianism demands an action, which is incompatible with fair play or fairness. In the early 1800s slave labour produced the most amount of good for the most amount of people.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    Locke believes that we can, but there is no one to regulate or make sure that we don't put our property unto an external object at the expense and disadvantage of someone else. History clearly shows that human nature is not such as Locke believed it but rather that we are capable of evil and aggression towards each other.

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    This way of thinking and describing things leaves little room for attention to the power games that lie at the center of most organizational life. Thus, making decisions about corporate strategic plans and the budgetary allocations that go with them; defining of core businesses and the shedding of what is

  2. Nigeria Country Study

    It brings with it clouds of dust from the desert. * Middle Belt - Traditionally an ethnic and political zone stretching from east to west across the central section of Nigeria and inhabited by many minor ethnic groups who had been unable to obtain significant political influence because of long-term dominance by the Hausa-Fulani and Kanuri emirates.

  1. The development of fascist doctrine.

    Fascim had been a spontaneous and disorderly growth. Fasci had organized in all the major cities of North Italy around local popular leaders. These men, while nominally subordinate to the control of the central offices of the movement, were in fact condottieri with personal followings.

  2. Extent of key political ideas in directly influencing change and development .

    Political extremism in Germany, developed from the failure of state and society to manage the complex problems arising from the country's sudden defeat at the end of WW1. Certainly, to a great extent it was not the ideology of Nazism itself that led to the rise of Hitler's dictatorship, but the failings of the Weimar Republic, and the economic climate.

  1. Analyse one model of abnormality I am going to analyse the biological model

    These studies however do not show whether it is a cause or an effect. Finally, neuroanatomy. This suggests that it is the brains structure that determines whether someone becomes mentally ill. According to recent studies schizophrenics tend to have different shaped brains compared to 'normal' people.

  2. Iran Country Study

    However, when the actions of the other chamber significantly alter the bill, a conference committee is formed to reconcile the differences between the House and Senate versions. If the conferees are unable to reach agreement, the legislation dies. If agreement is reached, a conference report is prepared describing the committee members' recommendations for changes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work