• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12

"Critically discuss the prospects for the successful realisation of an European Common foreign and Security Policy and accompanying European Security and Defence Policy in the 21st Century".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Critically discuss the prospects for the successful realisation of an European Common foreign and Security Policy and accompanying European Security and Defence Policy in the 21st Century". The aim of this paper is to identify the many changes, which have occurred in the European Union and potential for European Security and Defence Policy in the future. (Park and Rees 1998, p.11) state "During the Cold War, the concept of 'Security' was generally understood in Europe as more or less exclusively concerned with militarily related issues, and was dominated by East-West confrontation." Europe from 1945 - 1989 was governed by its unified fear of the Soviet Union and the continual threat of the Cold War, which existed. In actuality the initial primary concerns of the EU where in fact trade and agricultural support and not really foreign affairs. However, in 1970 the then EEC agreed on a loose inter-governmental forum about foreign affairs, namely the European Political Corporation. The fall of the Berlin Wall resulted in a more open-minded approach and discarding the NATO mindset which had existed over the Cold War period. Now that the Atlantic Alliance was deemed almost obsolete, the European Union now had to define its own geopolitical interests out with the mindset of the NATO framework. This resulted in the introduction in1991 of the Maastricht Treaty and with it the introduction of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the EU came about. ...read more.

Middle

(Park and Rees 1998, p.13) state "shifts in the global balance of power are likely to pose more traditional, military, security problems to Europe." The breakdown of the Soviet Block and then again enlargement introduce these types of problems. The Western European Union (WEU) was established on 6 May 1955 based in London Headquarters. Membership of the WEU consisted of the Six alongside the United Kingdom and offered an opportunity for seven European countries to discuss issues of Security in Europe. The WEU in fact assisted with the rearmament of West Germany under admission of West Germany to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). The WEU Ministers meets twice yearly and more regularly at an ambassadorial level about twice per month to debate and report on security issues in Europe. The WEU according to (Bainbridge and Teasdale 1996, p.478) "has no military capability, being wholly dependant on forces assigned to it by Member States. However unlike NATO, it can act 'out of area', as it did by undertaking minesweeping in the Gulf during the Iran-Iraq war." The WEU marked a unified security policy in the EU. Around 1987 the WEU acted as a forum for discussing specific European Security Questions and assisted by the Hague according to (Bainbridge and Teasdale 1996, p.478) "the adoption of the 'Platform on European Security Interests', which contained the commitment to develop a 'more cohesive European defence identity'." ...read more.

Conclusion

Indeed the unilateral approach, which has been taken by America since the reign of George Bush Junior, has in fact been causing much upset in Europe. In particular the current Iraq conflict has come into much mixed opinion between the European Member States. The United Kingdom has been behind Bush in the War against Iraq/Saddam; on the other side of the scope is France who was completely against any action. Common Foreign Security Policy in Europe as it currently stands has taken a bashing and the damage may not be undone. Change is needed to ensure that a unified Europe stands unified in matters such as Iraq. The European Union has always operated on an incremental process and learnt from previous mistakes. The future of the EU and its European Security and Defence Policy in the 21st Century will have to be completely rethought after the effects from issues arising from Iraq and other military conflicts, which have highlighted a flawed system. The autonomy of Europe is not a reality at present as the Rapid Reaction Force is not strong enough yet to defend all of Europe. A unified approach from both NATO and Europe in relation to Common Foreign Security Policy is required and holds the key to European Success. As far as America is concerned however, the autonomy of the EU is a very big threat and is perhaps not the best option to suit them. Is Europe strong enough in the future to stand against America? Only time will tell. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "'A troublesome partner.' Using examples, to what extent would you say this comment accurately ...

    4 star(s)

    I support withdrawal from the EEC (certainly unless the most fundamental changes are effected)." It was not Blair, a Europhile, who changed the Labour party from its anti-EC ideas, however. It was a combination of Neil Kinnock and Delor's ability to win over the TUC in 1988.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent has the European Union been successful in "establishing" a coherent European ...

    On the other side, the EU guarantees the quality of all the goods in any market. All the consumers benefit from the same high level of protection with accordant to the consumer policy. All the economic policies concerned above not only provide more profits to both the enterprise and consumers,

  1. To What Extent Does the EU Display a 'Democratic Deficit'?

    can be carried out at a national level by member states' legislatures. In the UK, in the House of Commons, there is a European Scrutiny Committee which considers all EU legislation and its likely impact, and brings legislation it feels is important to the attention of the House as a debate item.

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    It will cost Boots approxmently 40 million in preparations for the euro, this 40 million will be used to update systems and get the company ready for the euro. Benefits to Boots will be less conversion costs, suppliers more like to trade as same currency.

  1. The aim of this essay is to present the reason of British government changing ...

    of arrangement with the EEC were strongly reminiscent of those issued by Conservatives between the failure of their free trade are proposal at the end of 1958 and 1961 decision to seek entry to EEC. It was the need to maintain Britain's political influence and to secure its economic prosperity

  2. Why has the Common Agricultural Policy proved so controversial?

    Therefore, France, whose agricultural sector accounted for twenty six per cent of the labour force in 1955 compared to Germany's eighteen per cent (El-Agraa, 2001, pg232) had a lot to gain from protecting its farmers. This situation only becomes controversial when the question of reform arises.

  1. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    But after De Gaulle had retired and French President Georges Pompidou had talked with Heath and was convinced of his honest pro-European attitude membership the EEC was finally accepted. The factor of General De Gaulle in answering the question of why Britain joined the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957 is one of the strongest factors.

  2. The Foreign Policy of Great Britain in relationship to the European Union.

    is 'Britain's future is and will be as a leading partner in Europe', pronounced in Warsaw by the Prime Minister, Tony Blair. The British Government not only explains why should his state support the Union, but also tries to excuse the difficult EU-GB relationship in the past.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work