• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Define the difference between negative and positive freedom, outline the implications of the state in each.

Extracts from this document...


Tuesday, 15 October 2002 Jad Salfiti A1 Politics Define the difference between negative and positive freedom, outline the implications of the state in each In his "Two Concepts of Liberty", Isaiah Berlin distinguished between two theories of liberty; Negative and Positive freedom. The negative view advocates freedom with regard to independence of an individual from interference by other persons, institutions or governments, and fundamentally the absence of eternal restrictions or constraints upon the individual. Berlin argued that "I [he] am normally said to be free to the degree to which no man or body of men interferes with my activity. Political liberty in this sense is simply the area within which a man can act unobstructed by others", it thus follows that mere incapacity to attain a goal is not lack of political freedom. ...read more.


This is not to say, however, that state intervention in the form of economic management or social welfare can never be justified, but only that it cannot be justified in terms of freedom. On the other hand in the positive view, freedom entails what an individual is actually able to do or to be. Positive freedom is the "freedom which consists in being one's own master" or of being an "instrument of my own, not of other men's, acts of will". Self mastery requires that the individual is able to develop skills and talents, broadens his or her understanding, and gain fulfilment. Berlin believes that this conception of positive freedom is synonymous with knowing what is rationally or ideally best to do or what is necessary. ...read more.


When the political state is seen to embody such a higher rationality, it can justify coercing others for their own sake, arguing that this will make them do what they would have otherwise chosen for themselves had they been fully rational. It is often seen as the antithesis of negative freedom in that, instead of justifying the contraction of state power; it is more commonly linked to welfarism and state intervention. The notion of positive freedom therefore encompasses a broad range of theories and principles, whose political implications are diverse and sometimes contradictory. In effect, freedom maybe positive in that it stands for effective power, self-realisation, self-mastery or autonomy, or moral or 'inner' freedom. Accordingly, positive freedom can lead to totalitarian or coercive regimes, so democratic states should be concerned with negative freedom. Negative freedom (the lack of coercion), rather than positive freedom (self-mastery or self-determination). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Positive and Negative Conceptions of Liberty.

    Members of that society are free to the extent that they participate in its democratic process. However positive liberty is also said to contain an internal contradiction. Berlin argued that the positive idea of liberty could be used by totalitarians and dictators to justify their actions.

  2. Distinguish between negative and positive freedom and explain the implications of each for the ...

    Yet, it is "evil" since it enforces collective will upon society, thus constraining individual freedom. Negative freedom also supports economic freedom. Classical Liberals advocate free market and laissez-faire principles, believing that the economy works better when left to its own devices.

  1. The Search for independence, Macedonia

    continued military territorial expansion. After he destroyed the powerful state of his southern neighbors, Alexander moved to the East and reached as far as India. Than Macedonia became the center of great empire. But Roman's aspirations toward the Balkans were present(215-205, 200-193, 171-167 B.C.) and Macedonia falls under Roman rule.

  2. Assess what should be the role of the state

    The view's economics lie in a centrally directed economy1- although theoretically sound, practical examples of command economies suggest it usually serves as a catalyst for shortages and poverty - again, undesirable and unpleasant connotations. Ultimately, this project of suppressing civil society2 sees all personal freedoms removed: everything and everyone must

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work