• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the functions of the Council of Ministers, European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Court of Justice in making and interpreting European Union law.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Law Exam Question June 2003 3 (a) Describe the functions of the Council of Ministers, European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Court of Justice in making and interpreting European Union law (15 marks) There are 4 main institutions established by the Treaty of Rome, which make and interpret law in the European Union. The first of these is the Council of Ministers. For example, the Minister for Agriculture will attend meetings when the issue to be discussed involves agriculture. This means that the exact membership of the Council varies depending on the topic. Twice a year there are summit meeting where the heads of government meet to discuss broad matters of European policy. The Member States take it in turn to provide the President of the Council for a six month period. The President is assisted with the day-to-day work of the Council by a committee of permanent representatives known as Coreper. ...read more.

Middle

It is the motive power behind EU policy as it proposes policies and presents drafts of legislation to the Council for its consideration. If a Member State fails to implement EU law within its own country, or has violated a Provision in some way, it is the Commission's responsibility to intervene and if necessary, refer the case to the European Court of Justice. The Commission has performed this duty very effectively, which has resulted in judgements given by the court against Britain and other Member States. Another, less important institution of the European Union is the European Parliament or Assembly. The Parliament's main function is to discuss proposals put forward by the Commission, but it has no direct law-making powers. It has standing committees which discuss proposals made by the Commission in more detail and then report to the full Parliament for debate. ...read more.

Conclusion

These too hold office for six years. The ECJ has three main jobs. It hears cases against members states who are not following the EU law. For example, Re Tachnographs - The Commission v. The UK, where the UK was charged with not implementing a directive to install electronic equipment in lorries. If the case cannot go any further in the member states' own court hierarchy, which in Britain is the House of Lords, then the court has to refer the case to the ECJ if it involves EU law. This is known as mandatory referral as they have no choice but to refer it. Because the ECJ has so much work to do, a Court of First Instance was set up in 1988 to deal with some its work. They ensure that laws across the Member States are all in line with EU law and bring the laws up to a certain standard, while the ECJ helps to clarify any problems faced in interpreting EU law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘The main democratic deficit in the European Union is psychological, not institutional.’ Discuss.

    4 star(s)

    European parties are also not indicative of policy preferences in each country e.g. New Labour amalgamated into Party of European Socialists. Nevertheless, so far I have only pointed out the so-called 'institutional' aspects of the democratic deficit within the EU.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The European Union and UK Businesses

    3 star(s)

    The Maastricht Treaty (1992) The Treaty of Maastricht changed the official denomination of the EEC. Henceforth, it will be known as European Union. The term Union is used from the very beginning of the Treaty to clearly convey the advancement in a historical project.

  1. "How was the doctrine of supremacy developed by the European Court of Justice, and ...

    The implementation of Corpus Duris would appear to threaten our institution further as it would eradicate trial by Jury, introduce Double Jeopardy, allow Imprisonment without charge and replace the Innocent until proven Guilty concept with Guilty until proven Innocent. Indeed, since the treaty of Amsterdam, Britain is now facing the

  2. Supremacy of the European Union has, to all intents and purposes, crippled the domestic ...

    As such, any Act of Parliaments will shall be all exacting and adhered to directly by the nations courts. In the case of Factortame, (R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame (No. 3) [1996]) we can clearly see the ingratiating manoeuvres of The House of Lords as it bows to EU supremacy.

  1. An Analysis of the Powers of the European Parliament.

    Voter turn out in EP elections has been low, there are three main factors which may explain this. Firstly EP elections do not offer a change of government or policy, there is little popular interest or political excitement. Secondly the election campaigns have little coordination they are essentially national contest and European Issues have never made much of an impact.

  2. How important is the European Parliament?

    Therefore, we can see that although the EP has the opportunity to make significant changes in legislation, the Council can merely ignore the legislation, and the EP has no opportunity to exercise what would otherwise be a considerable power. The EP is imbued with increased powers of scrutinising the Commission and to some extent the Council of Ministers.

  1. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    What, however, if the interests of the nation-state would be served by functional cooperation with other nation-states? The No Demos thesis has an implicit and traditional solution: Cooperation through international treaties, freely entered into by High Contracting Parties, preferably of a contractual nature (meaning no-open ended commitments)

  2. This essay is intended to have an in-depth appraisal of the implication of the ...

    Therefore, it was expected that the use of unanimity in the decision process would be streamlined by the constitution and reduced to a minimum such that it would only be applied in measures of strategic interest to MS, while double qualified majority vote system (QMV)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work