• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Despite widespread interest their activities, pressure groups rarely have any significant influence over government policy. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Despite widespread interest their activities, pressure groups rarely have any significant influence over government policy. The argument whether pressure groups rarely have any significant influence over government policy has been a debated subject. It is debatable whether pressure groups can have any significant influence on the governments policy or activity however in the last decade the public has seen some success of both insider and outsider groups through campaigns and change in the public consciousness. The term ''significant'' influence defines the accomplishment of the groups main aims or purpose, success can also be defined as the attainment of popularity which is very interesting , as, outsider groups obtain popularity on many occasions such as, Stop the War protest in 2003 but the government claimed that the protest was not representative of the public opinion even though it had thirty million supporters, and even though the group achieved popularity it failed to achieve its aims. There are certain factors which affect a pressure groups success, this is why some pressure groups are more successful than others. ...read more.

Middle

have lead to some influence on government policies, most of the outsider groups raise popularity and awareness but fail to influence policies. Whereas many insider groups have influenced the parliament legislature. Core insider groups tend to stay off media publicity, but still achieve significant influence on government policy. As professor Wyn Grant said : '' Protective groups versus promotional have greater chances of success, there tends to be an assumption that the direct action used by promotional groups distance them from the government and their chance of prosperity'' When referring to lobbying, there have been many successful insider groups which have achieved their aims and influenced policy through the process of lobbying. An example of this is the BMA which supported public health initiatives and encouraged the passing of the new law which banned smoking in public places. Linking on to this the national charity Shelter campaign which aimed to end homelessness had individuals lobbying the government and was involved in drawing up the Homeless act in 2002. Whilst the BMA and Shelter showed to be successful, The Stop The War Campaign failed to influence the government policy. ...read more.

Conclusion

The use of Outrages direct action in 2009 resulted in the arrest of the members of the group. The Fawcett Society failed to achieve its aim to achieve its aims of women?s representation in politics and public life; pay, pensions and poverty as women are still getting paid less than men. In conclusion there are more examples of insider groups being successful in influencing the governments policies and they have influenced the governments policy more regularly. Compared to insider groups, outsider groups have had more media coverage and this has shown to help them in achieving their aims as the media has contributed to changes in policies, the work of Greenpeace and Plane Stupid contributed to the third runway at Heathrow Airport. Outsider groups have had some success in influencing government policy but it has been more rare and this can be due to their lack of consultation by government and lack of access to the governments corridors. Overall both insider and outsider pressure groups have a significant impact on government policy and it has been presented on a regular basis. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why are some pressure groups more successful than others?

    4 star(s)

    But groups such as Children in Need have very clear aims and they're well set out, because of this they're more likely to succeed and they do every year. The NUS currently doesn't have a 'clear' leader, because of this, there are many divisions within the group and its success could falter.

  2. Sectional and promotional pressure groups.

    However, cause groups have a more decentralised structure. The quality of leadership is an important asset for any pressure group and enthusiastic membership is more promising than a large body of passive supporters for example, The Howard League, with fewer than 3000 members, has made a great impact on the treatment of prisoners.

  1. The changing nature and activities of pressure groups - to what extent are they ...

    considerable amount of power has been devolved to Scottish and Welsh government (and to Northern Ireland, when devolved government is operating there). The main policy areas which have been devolved are: health, education, transport, planning, industrial development, agriculture and local government services.

  2. 'The existence of pressure groups makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    As the EU expands and becomes more financially powerful their influence over British politics will inevitably grow. Consequently appealing to the EU will potentially reap rewards for the pressure groups. In addition pressure groups within a country as politically active as England will have more of an influence on the institutions of the EU than their European counterparts.

  1. Why are some pressure groups more successful than others?

    push through her radical economic policies in the 1980s - their expertise in financial and economic matters ensured a close and successful relationship with the government. Finance Being wealthy is no guarantee of a group's success, as the tobacco lobby has discovered over smoking curbs, but it can yield positive results.

  2. Assess the contribution of interest groups to democratic government

    This view is furthered by the Corporatist view which discusses the privileged position that certain groups enjoy in relation to government, which enables them to influence the formation and implementation of policy. This cosy relationship is seen clearly in America where corporate organisations wield a vast deal of power due to their access to lobbyists.

  1. A Cabinet Minister once described Pressure Groups as Creatures which strangle efficient government. Discuss ...

    These include FOREST or ?Freedom Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco? who defend the rights of smokers who say that they have been heavily victimised by the public and the media since the smoking ban in Britain. Another group would be the Stonewall group who represent gays in

  2. Describe the influence pressure groups have on Parliament

    These include door-to-door canvassing and more favourably, large demonstrations. Greenpeace is known for its sometimes controversial demonstrations such as Arctic 30 which saw 30 members of their group jailed in Russia for protesting against oil drilling. They have also been criticised for their campaign on the Nazca Lines which saw part of the historical feature ruined by their campaigners.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work