• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Different cultures have different truths/A truth is that which can be accepted universally - what are the implications for knowledge of agreeing with these statements?

Extracts from this document...


Essay on Prescribed Title Theory of Knowledge DIFFERENT CULTURES HAVE DIFFERENT TRUTHS/A TRUTH IS THAT WHICH CAN BE ACCEPTED UNIVERSALLY - WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR KNOWLEDGE OF AGREEING WITH THESE STATEMENTS? Truth is not found, nor does it exist on some ephemeral territory outside of our worldly reality. In fact, we do not yet know where the drive for truth comes from, or what truth is? The principal conflict lies in the definition of truth, and the implications of that definition for the different areas of knowledge. It seems that the contention that favors the universality of truth is less likely today than the Foucauldian condemnation of universal truths, however his, is not without detractors. Foucault said that "Each society has its regime of truth, its general politics of truth: that is, the types of discourse which it accepts and makes function as true", whether we accept that truth resides in all-embracing and universal systems, or that the regime of truth lies with its purveyor, both schools of thought have their merits. While the nature of truth is downright deceptive, Foucault made the argument that they are produced not induced by authority figures, and that as such, the regime of truth depends upon deceit for its power. ...read more.


Even a spiritual interpretation of this statement would be different from religion to religion. Finding universal ground for all religious would be completely impossible, since they each push their own agenda and regard their particular brand of dogma as the real truth. To assume that the different religions of the world would ever agree on an universal truth is completely futile, and undermines the concept of organized religion, which dictates that truth must always be a commmunal activity, and implies that the community is responsible for distinguishing betweem true and false statements and determining who is charged with saying what counts as true. Only when we compare our own outlook to those of others, do we then realize what is universal and invariant, and what is distinctive and variable. Therefore, the arguments for the possibility of an universal truth are weak, since the role of the individual, more often than not, is to express the stifled truth of his own community, therein establishing the truth for his own culture. However, we see that in science and mathematics, universal truths are abundant, and necessary in order to satisfy all our demands of scientific theories. ...read more.


The Pragmatic theory on the other hand requires the human element, and emphasizes that only when something is acted upon does it become true. It holds that in order for something to be true, it must be useful to someone, however it may be useful for someone to believe a proposition but also useful for someone else to disbelieve it. For example, Freud said that many people, in order to avoid despair, need to believe there is a god who keeps a watchful eye on everyone. According to one version of the Pragmatic Theory, that proposition is true. However, it may not be useful for other persons to believe that same proposition. Since this theory suggests that truth is what an ideally rational inquirer would in the long run come to believe, it also espouses the idea that different cultures have different truths, not that a truth can be universally accepted. Truth is the ideal outcome of rational inquiry. Yet, as a theory of truth, the Pragamtic theory does not reveal what truth is, and neither does any other modern definition. Pilates' original cosmic question remains to be answered, and yet, it seems more reasonable to assume that each culture prepares its own version of the truth, rather than admit the possibility of an universal truth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    Socialist sociological analysis is understood by Marx as political science because it claims to overcome this one-sidedness and to grasp social reality as a whole whilst giving specific consideration to the two main social classes. I would underline the sociological features of Marx's theory: it refuses to identify the working

  2. Breaking down the Walls: A Discourse of Ideology and "Otherness"

    Put differently, Wright gives this particular example to show that, as a small child, he did not know blacks and whites had to be different. He as well as the others around him had to be taught that they were different because of the color of their skin.

  1. Assess critically Marx's distinction between ideology and science

    "Since, according to their fantasy, the relationships of men, all their doings, their chains and their limitations are products of their consciousness, the Young Hegelians logically put to men the moral postulate of exchanging their present consciousness for human, critical or egoistic consciousness, and thus of removing their limitations", Marx writes.

  2. Marxism Can Only Be Appreciated Retrospectively

    The modes of production: ".....shaped every aspect of human life, was itself not influenced by anything outside of itself, as it supplied it's own driving force." 1 The capitalists have interests in increasing their profits and making sure their power of the workers is secure where as the workers have

  1. Albert Einstein.

    Einstein's theory, and his subsequent elaboration of it, formed the basis for much of quantum mechanics. Three years after he started work at the patent-office, he sent his second paper, "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" to the University of Bern, where he soon became a lecturer.

  2. Compare and contrast the different ways in which organisations seek to control individual employees ...

    B would obviously resist A since his views are being overruled, this would result in a conflict between the two. The view put forward by Bachrach & Baratz, was that A had the power to exclude B from the decision making process altogether.

  1. Implanted Truths

    Like Richard Wright, I fully agree and declare that the ideas that are attached to all races are mere ideological constructions. I fully believe that the ideology of America, pushed by large institutions, creates a non-inherent belief that people of differing skin colors are also inwardly different.

  2. Natural Science

    Use the hypothesis to make a prediction: "The marble and the brick I throw from different heights in different cities will fall with the same acceleration". 6. Observe or experiment to test the prediction. 7. Limit the hypothesis if necessary: "Helium balloons need to be excluded from all objects".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work