• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss how effectively rights are protected in the UK.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss how effectively rights are protected in the UK In Britain, we have a negative approach to rights which means people can do what they like as long as there is no law in place that is able to stop them. Unlike in the USA and many other states, however the rights and liberties of British citizens are not set out in a single constitutional document with the USA being able to appeal to the Supreme Court if they feel rights are being infringed. In the UK civil rights have come under threat due to what many commentators have accused Labour of introducing creeping authoritarianism into British society, for example Labour introduced Detention without trial, (habeas corpus) which included the indefinite detention without trial of foreign national suspects for example the Belmarsh case where foreign terrorist suspects where held in Belmarsh prison without trial. ...read more.

Middle

Also due to the increase in the 'surveillance society' with Britain being monitored by over 4.5 million CCTV cameras, making it one of the most watched nations in the world thus making sure that nobody has any place to hide. Therefore due to this increase in the big brother society people's civil liberties are becoming eroded as people are always being watched with police knowing all details about people with ID cards. Also due to the misuse of anti terrorism legislation civil rights are not well protected, the government using it for the wrong purposes. An example of the is the Walter Wolfgang case, where an 80 year old who shouted abuse at Jack Straw was arrested by police under anti-terrorism legislation which violated the legislation as Wolfgang was not a terrorist he was just using his right of freedom of speech and was arrested for it under legislation that was not made for this purpose. ...read more.

Conclusion

The police argue this helps them solve crimes catching perpetrators. However this adds to the Big Brother society which we have in the UK as the government and the police are keeping tabs on people therefore by restricting the scope on the database they are preserving civil liberties as they are stopping the government knowing details about everyone. Also in the Freedom Bill it endorses the Gibson Inquiry where Sir Peter Gibson is looking into whether the UK government was complicit in the torture of foreign suspected terrorists this shows how rights are being protected in the UK because people are looking into cases of suspected breaches of civil liberties and trying to make sure they do not happen again. Therefore in conclusion civil liberties are not well protected in the UK because the government is to authoritarian and breaches peoples civil liberties. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3 Stars - This essay demonstrates an understanding of a number of ways in which rights are undermined in the UK - a conclusion is reached (though not properly supported) and several effective examples are deployed.
Where the essay could be improved is with more effective proof reading - watch out for sentences that are too long as they often don't completely make sense. There is also a lack of balance - the argument is one sided and does not consider a different perspective.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 26/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Long-term factors are no longer important in explaining voting behaviour in the UK. Discuss.

    4 star(s)

    The conservatives appear to have suffered a greater haemorrhaging of 'identifiers' than Labour. This causes a decline in turnout and is a source of greater volatility and instability in electoral behaviour. It has also led to a notable increase in parliamentary representation for the Liberal Democrats, and for 'independent' candidates.

  2. How Effectively Are Rights Protected In The UK?

    In the 1950s, the impact of reviews were sporadic and peripheral, however they are presently much more pervasive and have a systematic influence over government policy. For example, in 1997 the government introduced the Crime Sentences Act that gave the home secretary power to set a minimum time to be served by convicted murderers.

  1. How representative is Parliament?

    For example whilst Parliament is very socially unrepresentative, civil rights bills and voting rights bills were all pushed through when the support for them grew enough, this shows parliament to listen to the people and to act on those majority views.

  2. To what extent is Parliament representative?

    somewhat obligated to represent the views of the voter in a defined way. In some ways, MPs are a kind of messenger who represents the views and opinions of the society who have elected them. But, again, if following this view means going against their conscience, then this is another

  1. Discuss the view that there should be more state funding for political ...

    trade unions for Labour). This may not be a good thing, as this could cause politicians to feel isolated with no guidance available, and guidance and help is something which is essential to politicians nowadays, as without the support of organisation they may not operate to their full potential.

  2. How successful have the UK constitutional reforms been since 1997?

    With the Scottish university fees covered for students, England?s aren?t. This has caused large controversy over the success of devolution because it?s simply unfair. Also devolution was brought in to allow individual in institutions to govern the people who apply to them.

  1. The strengths of the UK constitution outweigh the weaknesses. Do you agree?

    In unwritten elements especially different clarifications of meanings can lead to confusion and opposing ideas. For example, works of authority such as The English Constitution by Walter Bagehot are open to interpretation and meanings can differ on a person to person basis.

  2. From what extent does the UK suffer from a participation crisis?

    This has set back the UK?s democracy due to this decline in participation bought on by the medias pessimistic viewing and poor efforts of getting across important information to the public. However, other forms of participation are on the increase.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work