• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss how effectively rights are protected in the UK.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss how effectively rights are protected in the UK In Britain, we have a negative approach to rights which means people can do what they like as long as there is no law in place that is able to stop them. Unlike in the USA and many other states, however the rights and liberties of British citizens are not set out in a single constitutional document with the USA being able to appeal to the Supreme Court if they feel rights are being infringed. In the UK civil rights have come under threat due to what many commentators have accused Labour of introducing creeping authoritarianism into British society, for example Labour introduced Detention without trial, (habeas corpus) which included the indefinite detention without trial of foreign national suspects for example the Belmarsh case where foreign terrorist suspects where held in Belmarsh prison without trial. ...read more.

Middle

Also due to the increase in the 'surveillance society' with Britain being monitored by over 4.5 million CCTV cameras, making it one of the most watched nations in the world thus making sure that nobody has any place to hide. Therefore due to this increase in the big brother society people's civil liberties are becoming eroded as people are always being watched with police knowing all details about people with ID cards. Also due to the misuse of anti terrorism legislation civil rights are not well protected, the government using it for the wrong purposes. An example of the is the Walter Wolfgang case, where an 80 year old who shouted abuse at Jack Straw was arrested by police under anti-terrorism legislation which violated the legislation as Wolfgang was not a terrorist he was just using his right of freedom of speech and was arrested for it under legislation that was not made for this purpose. ...read more.

Conclusion

The police argue this helps them solve crimes catching perpetrators. However this adds to the Big Brother society which we have in the UK as the government and the police are keeping tabs on people therefore by restricting the scope on the database they are preserving civil liberties as they are stopping the government knowing details about everyone. Also in the Freedom Bill it endorses the Gibson Inquiry where Sir Peter Gibson is looking into whether the UK government was complicit in the torture of foreign suspected terrorists this shows how rights are being protected in the UK because people are looking into cases of suspected breaches of civil liberties and trying to make sure they do not happen again. Therefore in conclusion civil liberties are not well protected in the UK because the government is to authoritarian and breaches peoples civil liberties. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3 Stars - This essay demonstrates an understanding of a number of ways in which rights are undermined in the UK - a conclusion is reached (though not properly supported) and several effective examples are deployed.
Where the essay could be improved is with more effective proof reading - watch out for sentences that are too long as they often don't completely make sense. There is also a lack of balance - the argument is one sided and does not consider a different perspective.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 26/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. How Effectively Are Rights Protected In The UK?

    In the 1950s, the impact of reviews were sporadic and peripheral, however they are presently much more pervasive and have a systematic influence over government policy. For example, in 1997 the government introduced the Crime Sentences Act that gave the home secretary power to set a minimum time to be served by convicted murderers.

  2. Is Britain an elective dictatorship?

    Insufficient time and poor resources have meant that it has become more ineffective. Most analysts agree that select committees have done little to change the balance of power between the executive and legislative. Reformers suggest that they can be made more effective, by giving them larger budgets, more powers, more access to documentation, and greater powers to interrogate ministers.

  1. How representative is Parliament?

    Another way in which parliament can be seen to be representative is that it is representative of current events and public feelings. It can be seen that modern politics is very much reactionary to crisis and current opinions which shows parliament to be representative of commonly held views.

  2. How successful have the UK constitutional reforms been since 1997?

    These reasons show how devolution as a constitutional reform can affect our country in negative and positive ways, mainly negative but some argue that it improves the governing of our country via its increase in democracy. So overall we see that it is argued that devolution is mainly un-successful.

  1. The British Constitution is no longer fit for purpose. Discuss.

    However, this concern also arises from a traditional unwillingness to write down individual rights and freedoms, to give them legal substance. Individual?s freedom in the UK traditionally rested on ?residual? rights that were supposed to be part of common law.

  2. Assess the view that the unionist/nationalist division is becoming less significant in Northern Ireland ...

    All legislation must be passed by OFMdFM and this can lead to legislation getting killed before it is initiated if either of the ?big two? do not like it. MLAs have the possibility of raising a Petition of Concern if they believe there is an issue which is a serious concern to their community.

  1. How Democratic is the UK?

    for them and so they are not necessarily representing the views of the electorate. Again, the FPTP system does not represent what the electorate want. If governments are being elected with less than 50% of votes cast then that obviously means the majority do not want that party to lead

  2. "Constitutional reform had gone too far, or not far enough?" Discuss

    However, as they are currently in a coalition with the Liberal Democrats, who wish to dramatically reform the House of Lords, they had to come up with a compromise. This compromise came in the form of proposing for 80% of the members to be elected, with the remaining 20% being appointed by Appointment Committees.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work