• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13

Discuss the conflicts between Employee and Employer by Marxist

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the conflicts between Employee and Employer by Marxist Crystal Xu Table of Content Page 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview on the essay topic ..............................2 1.2 Structure of this essay ...............................2 2. About Marxism 2.1 Overview on Marxism ..............................3 3. Conflict between Employer and Employees 3.1 In Management Studies ...............................4 3.2 In Marxism ...............................4 3.2.1 Labour Power ...............................4 3.2.2 Capitalism Power ...............................5 3.2.3 Source of the Conflict between Employee and Employer .......................6 3.2.3.1 Employers ...............................6 3.2.3.2 Employees ...............................7 4. Conclusion .............................10 Bibliography ..............................12 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview on the essay topic To organisations, employees (labours) are wonderful resources, because they are compact and multi-purpose, capable of simple manual tasks or dealing with complicated machines, most importantly, they are the profit maker for their employers. However, there is always a problem between employees and employer- 'Any attempt to manager in a humane way, by consensus, is doomed to failure because of the irresolvable conflict between employees and their employers.' Within nearly every organisation or company conflicts occur from time to time, between the employers and the employees. This paper argues what kind of conflicts between employee and employer from the perspective of Marxism and Labour Theory. 1.2 Structure of this essay The main purpose of this essay is to define the conflict between employees and employers is irresolvable. Firstly, I will briefly introduce Marxism and the Marxism Economy. Secondly, I will explain some of the Marx's issue on Labour Power and Capitalism Power, this will lead to the next section- the conflict relationship between them in an organisation. Thirdly, in this section I will describe the sources of conflict in an organisation, and discuss why the conflict between them is irresolvable. ...read more.

Middle

Hence, some forms of production are needed for survival. The suggestion being that it is acceptable for oneself but not for others because some individuals may have all factors of production (capital, entrepreneurship, labour and land), while others may have nothing but just their own labour, which eventually will result in uneven distribution of wealth and income. Additionally, Marx argued that capitalism deprives the labour force of their 'creative fulfilment', and since they are portrayed to be the already planned part of the production process, they are unable to achieve self-actualisation. 3.2.3 Source of the Conflict between Employee and Employer 3.2.3.1 Employers As Marx observed, a class conflict was sometime coming to a head within the capitalist order, which is the conflict between capitalists and exploited wage-workers. If we want to talk about the conflict is caused by employers, this will come down to a very important theory in Marxism - Surplus Value. As someone defined the surplus values as: 'The surplus produced over and above what is required to survive, which is translated into profit in capitalism. Since the capitalist pays a labourer for his/her labour, the capitalist claims to own the means of production, the worker's labour-power, and even the product that is thus produced.' 8 Marx also poses the problem this way (Capital Vol. 1) 'Workers are exploited under capitalism.'9 Workers as employees in an organisation, they are working for their employer, and their employer has the power to either use or dismiss its employees in the organisation. Also, from Marx's point of view, 'The bosses are always out to get that little bit more out of the workers. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the final section, I overview the whole essay, and discuss the why the conflict between employer and employee is inevitable, in addition I illustrate the answer with some of my opinions at the end. Most of people believe that employers are always trying to maximise their profit all the time, and they are try to make more profit by forcing their employees to work longer hours. From a different point of view, Campbell (1981:75) argued that 'It is often argued by orthodox economists and others that the motivation and goals of firms is no longer to attempt to maximised profits'. Now they see 'all of their employees, consumers, managers and society as a whole.' Employers now are gradually increasing their employers' wages, and providing them with pensions, and other benefits too. However, the reason that employers can provide their employees higher wages and more benefits, because they are still making extra profit by getting surplus value from their employees in a different way. Therefore, employer wants to make more profit by getting their employees works more, employees want to be paid more and get as more benefits as possible from their employer. From my point of view, conflict is a process that begins when one party observes that another party has negatively affected, or is about to negatively affects something the first party cares about. Conflict is inevitable because people will always have different viewpoints, ideas, and opinions. Also, as Marx said, 'The only goals that political economy sets in motion are greed and the war amongst the greedy' (cited by Campbell, 1981:21). To conclude, if employer wants to make profit in an organisation, it is impossible to manage its employees in a humane way, so the conflict between employers and employees is always irresolvable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. "What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Marxist histories"?

    With this vicious circle, that is brought by capitalism, comes economic misery for all of society. Marx also had a theory, which described the workers in the capitalist system. Marx used the term alienation of labour in describing what effects the labourers feel under a capitalist system.

  2. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    Social democracy is based more on moral or religious beliefs than scientific analysis. Whereas Marxism was based on materialism and claimed to discover the laws of historical and social development, social democracy is more utopian and is based on the belief that humans are bound together by ties of love, sympathy and compassion.

  1. Why does Marx believe that capitalism will inevitably give way to socialism?

    What would enable this to occur? He argued that the internal contradictions of capitalism would lead to its downfall, and the adversary developing outside of capitalism's power (the proletariat) would aid this to happen. Marx's thesis shows that the very nature of capitalism means that it goes through highs and lows.

  2. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    By removing the cause you produce a cure. Once a cure for the pain has been made, the individual will have no need to take the "drug" of religion as there will be no painful symptoms to dull. However, how exactly does religion "dull the pain of oppression"?

  1. How did Marx explain the collapse of Capitalism and how did the ideas of ...

    In effect, progress is the consequence of internal conflict. For Hegel, this explained the movement of the 'world spirit' toward self-realisation though conflict between a thesis and its opposing force, an antithesis, producing a higher level, a synthesis, which in turn constitutes a new thesis. Marx, as Engel's put it, 'turn Hegel on his head' by investing this Hegelian dialectic with a materialistic interpretation.

  2. 'Parties do not matter anymore.' Discuss.

    However, many would argue that the extent to which parties do not matter anymore, particularly with regard to popular identification, has been exaggerated; parties could echo the words of Mart Twain: the report of my death was an exaggeration.'

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    The job of political theory is to read these texts and see if any of these ideas can be applied to the world as it is today. In many senses the Lockean doctrine, however insufficient it may be in attempting to explain all the roles of government suffers the same

  2. The rise of the Labour Party had more to do with class consciousness than ...

    Even in its small and weak 1900 form, the LRC was evidence of the unions' desires to demonstrate some degree of political as well as industrial capability in asserting their interests. The role socialism had at this time is not so clear.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work