• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the view that the constitutional reforms since 1997 have not been sufficiently extensive.

Extracts from this document...


Discuss the view that the constitutional reforms since 1997 have not been sufficiently extensive A major issue and talking point within British politics has been constitutional reforms which are changes to a constitution of a nation or state which changes how a country is run. Examples of constitutional reform since 1997 are the devolution for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and the reform of fixed term parliaments. One of the arguments saying that the reforms since 1997 have been extensive is the Conservative perspective. The conservative perspective argues that the ancient constitution in other words the traditional constitution, symbolizes the collective wisdom of past generations and should be tempted with unnecessarily. The conservative perspective also states that the constitution is delicate and fragile which reformers can't understand so should leave it alone in order to prevent any damage. So from the conservative perspective the reforms under Labour have been extensive because they have changed tradition for example devolution in 1997 introduced localism ...read more.


This is seen as a big change to the UK constitution as it weakens the parliamentary sovereignty which is seen as a big change as parliamentary sovereignty is a big part of the constitution as A.V Dicey said it is the ,'cornerstone of the constitution'. Therefore the human rights act is seen as extensive due to it weakening parliamentary sovereignty. The reforms have been extensive due to them increasing the separation of powers in the UK. This was done by passing The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 which substantially separated the judicial branch from the executive. This is seen as an extensive change due to it creating a significant check on the executive's power as it could no longer manipulate the legal system as easily. Therefore is seen as an extensive reform. The planned reform by the Lib Dem-Conservative coalition to change the electoral system will be very extensive if it goes through. ...read more.


Therefore the reforms have not been extensive due to the ordinary people receiving no more power and the elites keeping the power. Another argument supporting the idea that the reforms have not been sufficiently extensive is the liberal perspective. The liberals argue that the package of constitutional reforms has been insufficiently radical; this is contrasted with the conservative perspective that the reforms are too extensive. An example of the liberal perspective is seen through electoral reform referendum. The liberals wanted proportional representation bringing a new type of politics to the UK. However they have only been promised a referendum on the alternate vote system which is not proportional and will only have a limited effect on the political system which the liberals feel is too feeble and not fundamental enough to change how politics is run. Therefore through the liberal critique we see how the reforms have not been extensive enough to sufficiently change the UK constitution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful has constitutional reform been since 1997 ?

    3 star(s)

    The anti terrorist measures ratified after September 11th are seen as a case in point.Also , the freedom of information act , although a good idea was too weak and allowed governments to remain excessively secretive. Also, In 2011 , the importance of the human rights act is being questioned and the need for it even more so.

  2. To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 reduced the powers of the UK ...

    However as time has moved on the power shift has been more apparent as different parties have occupied the devolved parliaments and policy has differed from national government. We can see a great example of this when in 2011 the SNP secured a majority in the Scottish parliament.

  1. To what extent have Government been concerned with reducing the dependency culture since 1997?

    said 'We can end poverty - I mean it...it is something no child should endure' Unemployment too has been a prior issue for the dependency culture to stop being self reliant. September 2009 saw the worst figures of unemployment in 14 years where 2.47 million are unemployed.

  2. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    This ensures that the publics views and interests are properly and accurately adhered to and not distorted by politicians who claim to support them. * Political Education- By Widening the opportunities for political participation, and allowing debate to focus on a particular issue, referendums help to create a better informed, more educated and more politically engaged electorate.

  1. priministers power

    A scandal about party finances was fuelled by Asil Nadir's escape from British justice; poor local election results in 1993; disastrous by-elections; an appalling party conference in the summer of 1993 which launched the ill-thought out 'back to basics' propaganda which backfired with a series of revelations about Tory M.P.s

  2. How successful have the UK constitutional reforms been since 1997?

    for the British Government and damaged the reputation of the Human Rights act. It allowed Abu Hamza, a leading terrorist, to claim asylum in the UK. Considering what he has done to damage the world today people believe he should be extradited from the UK but again the HRA has

  1. To what extent have constitutional reforms introduced since 1997 made the UK more democratic?

    sovereignty over a lot of things, especially in Scotland, Parliament still controls their finances, still controls their armed forces, and all Scottish laws are decided in Parliament, located in Westminster, England. Does that sound very democratic? As of right now, Scottish parliament has hardly any real power over what happens in their own country.

  2. Discuss the view that the British constitution has been subject to fundamental change since ...

    Another change that?d be apparent would be for rights, especially to the Human Rights Act of 1998. This was a change to Statute Law as it clarifies any grey areas by putting the rights of citizens on a stronger statutory footing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work