• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the view that the presidency is not a powerful office

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Discuss the view that the presidency is not a powerful office The president of the USA has, on paper at least, numerous powers that he can exploit to his benefit. These powers have then been classified as those constitutional powers and those inherent powers, those not in the constitution. Anyone looking at a glance, would probably presume that the presidency is an extremely powerful office with powers such as ; chief of the executive, commander in chief, pardoning criminals and national leader of arguably the world?s largest power. However in reality there are equal amounts of checks and balances designed by the founding fathers to ?frustrate? the president to essentially prevent a dictatorship. Thus there are a wide variety of aspects to be explored when discussing whether the presidency is a powerful office or not. There is much evidence to suggest that despite the many limits on the constitutional powers of the presidency, there remain numerous examples to say that the presidency is a powerful office through the use of his constitutional powers. One major constitutional power of the presidency is that of being the commander in chief, usually falling within the realm of foreign policy. This effectively allows the president to have supreme authority over the nations military. Obama effectively used this power to withdraw some US troops from Iraq whilst with the same power he extended the war on terror into Yemen and Pakistan. ...read more.


For example despite his constitutional treaty making powers he failed to complete the free trade agreement with S.Korea, failed to get currency policy changed in China and European countries were not persuaded to increase government spending as a means of growth. This shows that perhaps the president?s treaty making powers are not as significant as they appear at first glance. The New Start treaty which would have reduced nuclear weapons was stalled in the Senate. Congress also blocked the global warming cap and trade bill as well as immigration reform stuck in the Senate. This demonstrates whilst the constitutional powers of treaty making, Congress has a large part to say and thus questions the importance of this constitutional power. The president?s power to nominate executive branch officials is also limited which could suggest that the presidency is less powerful in these areas. This power is limited due to the Senate having to confirm all these appointments by a majority vote. When the Senate is controlled by the opposition party, many would say that the president?s power is greatly reduced. In analysis this brings up a theory that the president is neither stagnantly powerful or not, but his power fluctuates with various factors, one being party control of Congress. Similarly executive orders and pardons are perhaps not as significant as they first appear, due to them as well being in the public eye, thus presidents may not be able to carry out certain executive orders depending on the mood of the public, thus limits these powers greatly. ...read more.


Perhaps the main weakness of these inherent powers are that they depend so much on other factors rather than the constitutional powers which are there, written down and can be used whenever. Of course public opinion does come into play even when exploiting constitutional powers, but more so with inherent powers. The presidency may not be able to use the Bully Pulpit for instance at times of unpopularity such as later stages of W.Bush?s reign after controversy of the Iraq war. Similarly many saw Obama?s State of the Union Address as a failure and this which usually sets out the presidents political agenda. This falls under the chief legislator inherent power and thus after a ?failed? state of the union address this could affect the power of persuasion, the agenda setting and national leader inherent powers. In evaluation it seems that although the inherent powers of the presidency are varied and powerful in certain circumstances they all rely of the power of persuasion and external factors, which means that not all of the time they will have the same power ?behind them?. In conclusion the presidency has a lot of powers both constitutional and inherent which at certain times can make the office extremely powerful. However it cannot be said that the office is or isn?t powerful, as the power fluctuates so much with external factors such as the public opinion, meaning that the presidency is at times a very powerful office as shown through examples previously, but equally can be a rather lame office at other times. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Using examples, explain the limitations on the Supreme Courts powers.How do Presidents veto legislation, ...

    president "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except cases of impeachment". The power of pardon has become increasingly controversial in recent times. In United States v. Richard Nixon (1974), the Court ordered President Nixon to hand over the so- called White House tapes and thereby stop impeding investigation of the Watergate affair.

  2. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    This means that the PM is not often constrained in this area, however, John Major was an example of a national figurehead who could not control his party. The UK constitution is un-codified and only part-written. This means that it is much easier to reform and change in comparison to the written, codified US constitution.

  1. US pressures groups are undemocratic, discuss

    More often than not, wealthy groups get their own way. They can afford to bid for ex-Congressmen to lobby for them and give them access to the decision makers. Professional lobbyists are an expensive resource; the wealthy groups that use them raise money through membership fees and Political Actions Committees (PAC's)

  2. The US President is more powerful as a world statesman than the UK Prime ...

    They must be reported to Congress though they cannot be undone by it. The power of the President as a world statesman however fluctuates and sometimes the individual office may have a more dominant role to play on the international arena than others.

  1. Outline the differences between the electoral systems for the US Presidency, the US Senate ...

    ratification the reason can best be stated thus: "Congressman Norris denounced the great combinations of wealth controlling the Senate and nullifying the will of the people. 'The evils of the present system are so great and so apparent that it seems to me this change ought to appeal to every

  2. The power of the President is limited to the power to persuade. Discuss.

    Similarly, the nation, and therefore the party, tends to rally around the President in times of national crisis, making it easier for the President to persuade. However, this can backfire if the President is not seen to respond to the crisis quickly or effectively enough, e.g.: Bush gained support from

  1. How effectively does Congress fulfil its constitutional roles

    However, the reality of the effectiveness is that Congress doesn?t fulfil this role well. ?Pork barrel? spending or ?earmarks? can be dropped in money bills and this wastes government spending in order to benefit a certain distract which makes this role ineffectively fulfilled.

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    They understood that political majorities may be tempted to enact laws that entrench their own authority; that in times of crisis people may panic and too readily sacrifice both fundamental freedoms and structural limitations; and that prejudice, hostility, and intolerance may at times lead governing majorities to give short shrift

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work