• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss why, generally, Americans have a poor opinion of Muslims and Arabs in particular - What can be done to improve relations between Arabs and Americans - Is it important to improve relations?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss why, generally, Americans have a poor opinion of Muslims and Arabs in particular. What can be done to improve relations between Arabs and Americans. Is it important to improve relations? It is true that Americans have a poor opinion of Muslims and Arabs in Particular. Most Americans use to look Muslims as ruthless and barbaric people, which are always ready to kill and destroy. They view all Arabs and Muslims as terrorist. This is because of the media portrayal of the Muslims and Arabs which skewed pubic opinion in America. American media has often projected individuals of Arabs or Muslims in a negative manner, that's why Americans have a poor opinion of Muslims and Arabs in general. ...read more.

Middle

American public are getting only one side of story from the media. Large numbers of Palestinians were killed by Israeli army, there was little mention is American media, their stories were never told but if one Israeli soldier is killed by Palestinians then they show repeatedly in American news channels. So we can find that American media does not accurately portray the going-on in the middle east. That's why Arabs are seen as terrorist and murderers due to how the media presents them and in result of that, to many in America, Islam is seen in terms of killing and bombing by extremist groups. ...read more.

Conclusion

The media must accept responsibility for being the major force in presenting the negative view of Muslims and it should accept responsibility by providing more balanced image of Arabs and Muslims. American government and media should tell the public the fact that the war is against a small group of terrorist who may be Muslims, and it is not the war against Islam. Islam is not the religion of war and destruction, it is a religion of peace. Islam didn't allow any one to kill civilians, diplomats and innocent peoples. That's why terrorists are not true Muslims. It will be more effective if media provide the more balanced news of both Israeli and Palestine and also educate the American public about Islam and its basic principles so that they can differentiate between Muslims and terrorists. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Armed Islamic Group [ Gia ]

    and law enforcement officials speaking on conditions of One possible avenue for fundraising was the numerous mosques throughout Europe RECUITMENTThere are reports of 20,000 to 25,000 fighters in the El-Djama'a, the military wing of the GIA. The fighters are a mixture of veteran Afghani war fighters (200-300)

  2. DNA and its close relative RNA are perhaps the most important molecules in biology.

    In source A it shows that Mao-Tse-Tung was successful and achieving China by force and "terrorism". In the source it says that "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun". This means that they only way to achieve is by "terrorism" and by force.

  1. Why have the Arabs used

    The source is biased because it contains way how the got power and leaded to the situation. However the source is biased because it shows one point of view. I think this would only lead to more violence in the world because people will think that violence is the only

  2. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    Israel denounced the declaration, dismissing it as irrelevant, and the US rejected it. By the mid-1990s, more states recognised the PLO declaration than recognised Israel. THE STOCKHOLM DECLARATION In December 1988, Arafat and the Swedish foreign minister issued a joint statement-quickly dubbed the 'Stockholm Declaration'-that the Palestine National Council recognised

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work