• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Distinguish between negative and positive freedom and explain the implications of each for the state.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Politics Questions Distinguish between negative and positive freedom and explain the implications of each for the state. Individual freedom is often seen as the core value of Liberalism. Nevertheless, freedom can be divided into two categories: negative and positive. Negative freedom, which is traditionally associated with Classical Liberalism, advocates the belief in non-interference, the absence of all external constraints upon the individual. This implies that individuals should be free to pursue their own interests free from outside restrictions or pressures. Nonetheless, negative freedom does not mean that individuals should have absolute and unrestricted freedom. Classical liberals, such as J.S. Mill, believe that if freedom is unlimited it can lead to "license", namely the right to harm others or to infringe their "natural" rights to "life, liberty and property". In this way, Classical Liberals often support minimal restrictions on the individual so as to prevent individuals from inflicting harm upon each other. ...read more.

Middle

The main duty of the sate is therefore to remove inequality in society by allowing a "level playing field" for all. Modern Liberals therefore support entities such as the Welfare State since it aims to help the poor and disadvantaged by redistributing wealth in their favour. In addition, Modern liberals advocate state intervention in the economy, since economic freedom can lead to exploitation. For instance, in the case of businesses, which seek to maximise their own profits, negative freedom allows employers to hire the cheapest labour force available, for example children as opposed to adults. The sate is therefore necessary to prevent such acts. Modern Liberals thus abandon the principles of laissez-faire capitalism, advocating instead the theories of J.M. Keynes. Keynes put forward the idea of regulation of equality in the economy through the injection of money into the system. Only in this way, with key economic responsibilities being placed in the hands of the state, could growth and prosperity be maintained. ...read more.

Conclusion

Only within a free market of ideas will "truth" emerge, as good ideas displace bad ones, Furthermore, toleration and pluralism lead to a balanced and harmonious society. Liberals believe that while groups with conflicting beliefs and interests should be free to develop, pluralism and toleration allow these groups to co-exist peacefully, accepting each other's different beliefs. Toleration and pluralism thus allow humans, who are all unique and individual, to express their various beliefs and ideologies freely within society. It should also be noted that Liberals support pluralism since it promotes distribution of political power. With power widely and evenly dispersed in society, rather than concentrated in the hands of the elite, pluralism complements democracy and ensures that those in charge respect the concerns and interests of the individual. In conclusion, it can be seen that pluralism and toleration are widely supported by liberals since they promote individual sovereignty whilst benefiting society at the same time. Tessa Jones 13.9 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Positive and Negative Conceptions of Liberty.

    Comparing and contrasting the two ideals means to try and fully understand the scope of each notion of liberty, and therefore come to a conclusion on the validity of each concept. I will be considering the differences and similarities between each concept, along with whether the two are realistically compatible.

  2. Liberalism has a dual commitment both to individual freedom and equality. How does liberalism ...

    idea about what individual freedom and equality should entail, in comparison with a modern liberal. "Many of the disagreements within liberal ideology can be traced back to these rival ideas of uniqueness and equality3". According to classical liberals freedom is the absence of restrictions.

  1. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    If a person were to commit suicide the person parents, grand-parents siblings, children, friends etc will be affected. Negative freedom is the absence of obstacles, barriers or constraints. The individual has negative freedom to the extent that actions are available to them in this negative sense.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Access to committee and other leadership assignments is granted to factions formed after elections, rather than to the electoral parties themselves, with no requirement that factions must be representative of electoral results in some fashion. It is only after the election that winning candidates show their true colors; independents reveal

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    That is the only way to have a proper government, a government the people will want to be under. References Locke, J. (1688). Second Treatise of Government. Locke begins by saying that God gave the world to mankind. Every feature of the world was "common" to man, meaning that the world belonged to everyone.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Accountability In the private sector, a timeworn clich´┐Ż is that those who manage publicly held firms are accountable to their shareholders. As Berle and Means (1933) long ago established, this claim is largely a myth. If the ensuing decades have changed this situation at all, it is only in the

  1. What were the most important factors in the rise of the modern state?

    This is one view on the significance of the economic developments during this period and indeed there are opposing views but it?s evident that the modern state proved to be effective in not only organising this new wealth but also redistributing resources, resulting in a great increase in economic activity.

  2. Why do liberals not believe in unrestricted freedom?

    This is because some people may have more money (If money were to exist in this system) and therefore be able to be more free than everyone else, as they could buy what they want, whereas less well-off people may not be able to.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work