Distinguish between negative and positive freedom and explain the implications of each for the state.

Authors Avatar

                                           Politics Questions

Distinguish between negative and positive freedom and explain the implications of each for the state.

Individual freedom is often seen as the core value of Liberalism. Nevertheless, freedom can be divided into two categories: negative and positive. Negative freedom, which is traditionally associated with Classical Liberalism, advocates the belief in non-interference, the absence of all external constraints upon the individual. This implies that individuals should be free to pursue their own interests free from outside restrictions or pressures. Nonetheless, negative freedom does not mean that individuals should have absolute and unrestricted freedom. Classical liberals, such as J.S. Mill, believe that if freedom is unlimited it can lead to “license”, namely the right to harm others or to infringe their “natural” rights to “life, liberty and property”. In this way, Classical Liberals often support minimal restrictions on the individual so as to prevent individuals from inflicting harm upon each other. However, it should be borne in mind that Classical Liberals do not accept any constraints upon the individual that prevent him from damaging himself, physically or mentally, since the individual still remains sovereign. Such a view of freedom means that classical liberals generally advocate the establishment of a minimal or “nightwatch” state, whose role is limited to the protection of individuals from other individuals. Tom Paine described the state as a “necessary evil”. It is necessary in that it establishes order and security and ensures that contracts are carried out. Yet, it is “evil” since it enforces collective will upon society, thus constraining individual freedom. Negative freedom also supports economic freedom. Classical Liberals advocate free market and laissez-faire principles, believing that the economy works better when left to its own devices. Laissez-faire capitalism is therefore commonly supported by Classical Liberals since it allows individuals to rise and fall according to their merit while ensuring prosperity.

Join now!

        Positive freedom, on the other hand, is generally supported by `modern Liberals. It is the belief that freedom should allow individuals to develop their own individuality and is commonly linked to the achievement of goals or benefits, usually personal development, self-realization or self-mastery. Thus positive freedom is concerned more with the individual’s ability to gain fulfilment and achieve self-realization. In this way, Modern Liberals generally adopt a more positive view towards state intervention. The sate is seen as an enabling state, which places necessary constraints upon the individuals to allow them to grow and develop their unequal talents, without ...

This is a preview of the whole essay