• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you consider the political activities of organised groups (pressure groups) to enhance or threaten the quality of democracy in Britain today?

Extracts from this document...


Do you consider the political activities of organised groups (pressure groups) to enhance or threaten the quality of democracy in Britain today? The role of pressure groups in the UK can be seen both to strengthen and weaken democracy as there is a significant case for either argument. For instance Thatcher believed that Democracy was threatened by Pressure groups whilst Blair has always had more 'friendly' relations with them illustrating the different opinions of those in office. However, we should also consider whether pressure groups are 'insider' or 'outsider' as those working within state apparatus tend to be more effective than there 'outsider' counterparts. Surely though how can pressure groups be good for democracy when they exert non-legitimate power as they are unelected? Since pressure groups are unelected this means there is not only is the problem of the non-legitimate power but also the fact that pressure groups are selfish, and do not consider the costs of there actions for others in society, this is especially the case of single-issue groups. They simply want there own demands fulfilled, even if that means fewer resources are available for other purposes, so the government would be pressured in to spending money on the particular issue groups idea meaning potentially meaning less resources on one objective means there is less available for something else. ...read more.


Even though they may allow the public to influence between election times pressure groups themselves are not even democratic or representative of their own members. The groups themselves generally are undemocratic for example the leader will be appointed simply because he went to public school such as Oxbridge. Similarly although many commentators suggest that pressure groups are essential for minorities they do however, often overlook the views of single parents and minority races. This point is demonstrated in Politics UK Pressure groups are often not representative of their members and in many cases do not have democratic appointment procedures for senior staff (cited in Jones et al, 2001, 224). This particular view is also taken up by people such as Margaret Thatcher and the New Right as there opinion of them was that cooperation between government and pressure groups was neither democratic nor functional. She stated that her party had been democratically elected to run the government, not the pressure groups (cited in Budge et al, 2004, 326). The role of 'insider' pressure groups could be argued though to enhance the quality of democracy as they could provide expertise knowledge to the MP's shown by the fact Blair arranged to have quarterly meetings with the TUC in 2000. ...read more.


Furthermore it can be disputed that it allows the voices of minorities to be heard such as single parents. This coupled with the fact that pressure groups give expertise knowledge to the MP's and civil servants whilst acting in our interests to protect to our rights and stop over powerful governments from passing unfair legislation you would therefore assume that pressure groups are beneficial to the democratic process. However, this is not the case as I alluded to earlier the majority of pressure groups are not even internally democratic themselves as the leaders are not elected and do not represent the views of their members. One of the most important issues is that of those inside state apparatus, as do you actually have any right to be there? The answer is no as they exert non-legitimate power to influence government to try and get their narrow means met. Margaret Thatcher is indeed correct in the earlier argument I put forward about government being elected and not pressure groups. Even though generally pressure groups threaten the quality of democracy in Britain they are useful in some ways, as I alluded to earlier the role of Greenpeace and how they aimed to change the laws regarding the environment, this is particularly important and shows they do have some role to play in democracy in Britain even though on the whole they do threaten democracy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why are some pressure groups more successful than others?

    4 star(s)

    The media can also contribute to the successes of a pressure group as a group with media support will gain positive coverage and possibly public support. Children in Need is an example, its latest telethon accumulated 12 million viewers, which undoubtedly contributed towards it success in raising �26 million.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Do pressure groups enhance or threaten democracy?

    3 star(s)

    This means that there are a lot of unaired views and the only way that these can be properly expressed is via pressure groups, leading to them enhancing democracy. A vote for a political party does not mean you agree 100% with 100% of their policies; pressure groups fulfill roles that the inadequacies of General Elections provide.

  1. Assess the contribution of interest groups to democratic government

    For example, Obama's Health Care legislation which was passed in 2009, many pharmaceutical companies attempted and successfully influenced the bill.

  2. In what ways do pressure groups strengthen democracy?

    Although there are also ways in which pressure groups weaken democracy. They can act against the interests of larger groups, which are not organised so are therefore going unheard. Another way in which they weaken democracy is the fact in which their leaders are not elected but have the chance

  1. Revision notes on pressure groups

    But not always, CBI stronger than TUC even though less members. * Government's views - needs to be sympathetic with government's aims * Organisation and leadership - leaders can bring number of advantages and organisation helps mobilise resources effectively. E.g.

  2. Access the view that pressure groups strengthen democracy.

    For example, the pressure group (ASH) Act on Smoking and Health have been successful in influencing the government to ban cigarette smoking in public places. Conversely, the other side to this argument is that the use of pressure groups taking this action encourages participation and the expression of differing opinions.

  1. Compare and Contrast Pluralist and Marxist Accounts of Power in the UK and US.

    What is interesting is that both pluralism and Marxism accord some special status to the media in that both groups agree that the media has the power to change people's attitudes. The differences arise when Marxists think that the media utilises this power to maintain the exploitation of the proletariat,

  2. Pressure groups revison notes

    Developed by Wyn Grant in the 1990s 2. PROBLEM- both types of classification are not perfect- eg: insider/outside model addresses some of these weaknesses but ignores that fact that many groups operate as both- eg: Amnesty International (Ideological outsider) have influenced the gov and UN, therefore they have changed from insiders to outsiders and back 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work