• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the UK have a 'constitution'

Extracts from this document...


Does the UK have a 'constitution'? Does it Matter? There are two meanings to the word constitution the first is that It will contain all of the rules for the organisation of the state.and secondly It will usuall be 'entrenced' which means that it is hard to change. The constitution of a country is a set of rules regulating the powers of its government and the rights and duties of its citizens. In all but a few democracies in the world, the nation's constitution can be found in a single document. The exceptions are Israel, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. As a result, people sometimes say that we in Britain do not have a constitution. On the other hand people say the United Kingdom does have a constitution; it is just a little hard to track down. People also frequently say we have an 'unwritten constitution' in the United Kingdom. As you can see from all these views it makes it a little confusing to whether or not UK has a written constitution or not. There are historical reasons why we have no written constitution; Britain has not been conquered since 1066, despite the two World Wars, Britain has been stable and has had a responsible government for hundreds of years. ...read more.


Recently, the Government has been accused of decreasing its accountability through various agencies by allowing them to carry out Government policies without the agency directors being held accountable for their mistakes; a written constitution could prevent this and make Parliament and democracy more accountable to themselves and the public. Parliamentary sovereignty is slowly diminishing in Britain, and a written constitution would not only decrease Government sovereignty but also increase sovereignty of the electorate and the judicial system. At the moment, if the Government wanted to modify or add to the unwritten constitution, they can do it simply by passing an Act; this may suggest that we have an elective dictatorship in theory where the Government exercises a kind of dominant influence over Britain. An inflexible, written constitution would evolve more power into the people and the courts. This would be especially beneficial with Europe in mind; Britain is the only member in the EU without a written constitution, and a written constitution may increase our sovereignty within Europe. Before we decide if UK should have a consititution we should see the main functions of any well worked constitution they are: > To distribute power within the political system > To limit the ...read more.


If we adopted a written constitution and amended it whenever necessary, there would hardly be any difference to the present constitutional system. In conclusion Altogether, a written constitution would bring many economical, social and political benefits, and be a worthwhile move for the future of Britain. I also think that a written constitution would provide our country with greater accountability and democracy. I believe that in order for a written constitution to work in the United Kingdom the written constitution needs to be enforced. That enforcement would comes through the court system with interpretations being made most frequently by the highest court in the country. is a written Constitution a wise choice for the UK ? Obviously, implementation of laws such as the European Human Rights declaration can be considered a form of a written Constitution. However, the experience of other common law jurisdictions should be weighed in the debate. I do not believe there is a simple answer regarding the choice of a written or unwritten constitution, but any changes should be weighed against the advantages and disadvantages of the countries that have a written constitution. ?? ?? ?? ?? Public Law I (LL1123) K0200720 Jayshree Patel 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    Legislation is not as firm as constitutional amendments but is respected as such unless Congress or the Supreme Court changes it. The constitution does not mention the direction or approach of how the US should take foreign policy.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of an unwritten constitution in the UK?

    There is no such principle in the British constitution because sovereignty lies with Parliament. The British constitution cannot be referred to in a legal sense like the US constitution, which has a Bill of Rights. A further disadvantage of the British constitution is that it is considered old fashioned, some

  1. Do the strengths of the Constitution outweigh the weaknesses?

    which keep government in check and accountable to the people, as they have the ability to influence its makeup on a more regular basis than in the UK for example. This does present another interesting conundrum though, the difficulty in enacting any change, whether good aswell bad, becomes much harder


    Under a Unitary arrangement, power is centralized. The British constitution is drawn from five main sources. Firstly, statute law. Statutes are Acts of Parliament which override all other British Constitutional sources and account for a growing proportion of our constitution.

  1. Has the US Constituion Protected Individual Liberties?

    This was the first Supreme Court case in United States history to directly address whether the right to keep and bear arms is a right of individuals or a collective right that applies only to state-regulated militias. However, many people argue that judicial interpretation has given the courts power far beyond what they should have.

  2. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    As Norton asserts regarding the EU, 'the longer the membership the more likely provision of treaties forming some kind of written constitution' (Norton, 2001, 78). The British constitution has had a radical overhaul due to the 'huge impact' (Hix, 2000, 48)

  1. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    Jonathon Powell (Blair), George Stephanopulus (Clinton).) The US President has very little control over his party in comparison to the UK PM. With a large enough majority and the correct discipline the UK PM can be an extremely powerful party chief, all MPs, particularly the cabinet owe their success, or any possible future success to the Premier.

  2. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    might assume that rights that were not listed in the bill of rights did not exist. The framers didn?t want a federal government that could do anything that wasn?t explicitly prohibited. The ten amendments all place limitations on the federal government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work