• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the US Constitution produce or hinder good government?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Does the US Constitution produce or hinder good government? The US constitution is the oldest constitution in the modern world; however does that necessarily mean that it brings about the best government? In this case the answer is probably yes, however there are many that would argue the idea that it actually results in a poor government and from that poor legislation. To defend our argument we must look at both sides of the discussion. The idea that it promotes good government can be defended by the point that it limits the government?s power. It ultimately protects the people from the government, because it means that sovereignty resides in the constitution, unlike in the UK where it resides in parliament. This is important in meaning that the constitution brings about good government because it does not allow political figures to abuse their power and the people of America, it outlines what can and cannot be done by the government and therefore allows the public to keep some freedom and privacy. ...read more.


It enables the legislation that is made to be checked thoroughly by each branch, it also compels all three branches to work together to make sure that they do what is best for America, and that is what the founding fathers wanted. They were especially worried about the president becoming a tyrant. The separation of powers and checks and balances make sure that this cannot happen. It also ensures that no radical legislation will ever be passed in the US. A strong opposition to this though, is that the separation of powers does not promote radical legislation, and although it is only the minority that see this as useful it is still a real opposition to the idea of the constitution promoting good government. No radical legislation means that there will be no huge change in America ever because the constitution does not allow it. The Checks and Balances can also be seen as negative as it could sometimes mean that instead of focusing on what the specific ...read more.


It has not been amended enough to adapt, it has only been amended 27 times in 200 years and 10 of those amendments were right at the beginning of its establishment. This too many people would not seem flexible but in fact the very opposite. It is also extremely difficult to amend as you need 2/3 majority in both houses of congress to vote in favour of the amendment. In contrast to the UK where you simply need it to pass through both houses with any majority. This could be seen as firm but it does show the difficulty in evolving the constitution. To conclude to the constitution does promote good government because it is flexible, we must bear in mind if something is so important to the development of America then it should not have too much problem being passed as an Amendment, is also beneficial because the constitution is firm as it does not allow change to easily and only the most important amendments become passed, and these are the ones that are necessary. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    Because at the moment the government can pass statute law very easily (as they have a majority) and allows the government to be adaptable to ever changing political circumstances. This would in effect make the UK constitution less flexible than it is at present.

  2. How well does the US Constitution Work

    Power is a temptation even to persons of the highest veracity. The founding father were well aware of this and believed anyone could be tempted to seek more power than they actually needed for personal benefit and not solely for the well being of the people.

  1. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    London have varying degrees of power devolved from Westminster and perhaps resemble a more federalised system, but just as easily as this power can be given it can be suspended as is the case of the Northern Ireland Assembly. The UK constitution is primarily concerned, as in the US, with the separation of powers within the three branches government.

  2. Cabinet Positions of the US Government

    It should be said that in the constitution there is no mention of the federal government having anything to do with public, education, and many have negative opinions about the federal government stepping in. -United States Department of Energy The Department of Energy is another of the recently created cabinet departments, having been created in 1977.

  1. Federalism: a form of world government.

    Judicial independence is also very significant to federalism. Since political safeguards seem to be inadequate to protect federalism, judicial safeguards seem more and more useful. Judicial independence is a necessary condition for judicial safeguards. Current history provides evidence that it is possible for the court to uphold federalism, not just

  2. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    The changes to the constitution in the twenty first century is definitely determining a lesser role of Westminster and serving to challenge the unitary nature of the constitution always prescribed to previously. Regional Assemblies The move to devolved national bodies has magnified a cry for regions in England to have some kind of autonomy.

  1. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    The power to limit government through the separation of powers can be demonstrated in the case of Brown v Board of Education, in 1954. The Supreme Court ruled that state laws establishing separate schools for black and white students, were unconstitutional[6].

  2. The Separation of Church and State in America.

    ?natural family? standard and it would hurt family morals, leading to an increase in things such as homosexuality (Young, Equal Rights, Gay Rights and the Mormon Church ). Religious groups, not only the mormons, have a lot of foothold in the communities of our country, when any group directly affiliated

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work