• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does the US Constitution produce or hinder good government?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Does the US Constitution produce or hinder good government? The US constitution is the oldest constitution in the modern world; however does that necessarily mean that it brings about the best government? In this case the answer is probably yes, however there are many that would argue the idea that it actually results in a poor government and from that poor legislation. To defend our argument we must look at both sides of the discussion. The idea that it promotes good government can be defended by the point that it limits the government?s power. It ultimately protects the people from the government, because it means that sovereignty resides in the constitution, unlike in the UK where it resides in parliament. This is important in meaning that the constitution brings about good government because it does not allow political figures to abuse their power and the people of America, it outlines what can and cannot be done by the government and therefore allows the public to keep some freedom and privacy. ...read more.


It enables the legislation that is made to be checked thoroughly by each branch, it also compels all three branches to work together to make sure that they do what is best for America, and that is what the founding fathers wanted. They were especially worried about the president becoming a tyrant. The separation of powers and checks and balances make sure that this cannot happen. It also ensures that no radical legislation will ever be passed in the US. A strong opposition to this though, is that the separation of powers does not promote radical legislation, and although it is only the minority that see this as useful it is still a real opposition to the idea of the constitution promoting good government. No radical legislation means that there will be no huge change in America ever because the constitution does not allow it. The Checks and Balances can also be seen as negative as it could sometimes mean that instead of focusing on what the specific ...read more.


It has not been amended enough to adapt, it has only been amended 27 times in 200 years and 10 of those amendments were right at the beginning of its establishment. This too many people would not seem flexible but in fact the very opposite. It is also extremely difficult to amend as you need 2/3 majority in both houses of congress to vote in favour of the amendment. In contrast to the UK where you simply need it to pass through both houses with any majority. This could be seen as firm but it does show the difficulty in evolving the constitution. To conclude to the constitution does promote good government because it is flexible, we must bear in mind if something is so important to the development of America then it should not have too much problem being passed as an Amendment, is also beneficial because the constitution is firm as it does not allow change to easily and only the most important amendments become passed, and these are the ones that are necessary. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    Parliamentary sovereignty would be lost and the judges who are un-elected, unrepresentative, unaccountable would be given more power, making judges political figures as well as legal figures just like in the US. As a result power would be removed from elected, accountable politicians.

  2. Do the strengths of the US constitution outweigh its weaknesses?

    There are 3 generalised views on the constitution over its strengths and weaknesses. The first view would be the liberalist view that believes in positive freedoms and opportunities, an active government - for example the government should get involved to prevent discrimination -; they favour equal rights amendments such as

  1. Does the UK have a 'constitution'

    the public will be able to read and understand our constitution a considerable amount more than they do presently. The written constitution could be taught in schools; this would not only increase their insight into politics but also encourage them to respect the laws included in the constitution.

  2. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    and recent research shows only one fifth of the Lords to be elected. Being elected to a position within a political institution suggests greater legitimacy than being appointed. Appointment would presumably be a role for the Prime Minister. The other house could then be politicised to an extent that it would serve as a second backbench for a cabinet.

  1. How well does the US Constitution Work

    be kept, as the needs of a nation and circumstances is something that would be altering rather than static and that would empower the people to make changes, as they perceived a need to do so. As a result, at times of calamity, governments have previously been able to deal with situations without infringing the liberties of citizens.

  2. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    Britain is said to be a unitary state rather than a federal one like the US. The British Westminster government is highly centralised meaning local authorities have very little influence on local policy; simply following direction from Westminster. The devolved assemblies in Scotland, Wales and to a lesser extent, Greater

  1. The British Constitution

    The President is not a member of congress. He serves as Commander in Chief of all United States Military Forces. In comparison, the British Prime Minister has a position by convention. He is an MP, with no specific job description, equal to his honourable colleagues. The Prime Minister is known as 'Primus Inter Pares', the first among equals.

  2. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    The power to limit government through the separation of powers can be demonstrated in the case of Brown v Board of Education, in 1954. The Supreme Court ruled that state laws establishing separate schools for black and white students, were unconstitutional[6].

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work