• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Draft a memorandum to the government evaluating the merits and demerits of differing reform options for the composition and powers of the House of Lords

Extracts from this document...


Bhupinder Kaur Kaler Group M Draft a memorandum to the government evaluating the merits and demerits of differing reform options for the composition and powers of the House of Lords. Most liberal democracies have bicameral legislatures, or legislatures with two 'chambers' or 'houses'. In the United Kingdom, the second chamber, the Upper House - or House of Lords - is currently an unelected chamber, which has judicial, leglislative, scrutinising and debating functions. It is a forum for reflection and for second thoughts on prospective policies and legislation. It provides for a diffusion rather than a concentration of parliamentary powers. It provides a valuable role for the revision of legislation which has passed through the lower house, this revision is greatly significant at times where the Lower House has a very strong majority, as it does now, or when the Commons have used methods to curtail debate. The scrutiny and amendment of Bills is equally important in improving the quality of the statute book. Thus the House of Lords does perform a great many important roles that could not be performed by the Commons. The majority of other second legislative chambers in liberal democracies are elected or are partly elected and part nominated. ...read more.


Elections to it would constitute a kind of mid-term opinion poll on the performance of the government, and voters would inherently register their dissatisfaction with the government of the day through their votes and this could leave the House of Lords as dominated by peers of one particular party affiliation. It could also be seen as more legitimate than the Commons. Proportional representation would also give the second chamber more legitimacy to the Commons which, is not the desired effect of any reform as its role is very different to that of the Commons. An indirectly elected second chamber would be composed of delegates from the devolved executives in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, and from local authorities in England. The English representatives would be delegates from the London authority and the regional chambers; themselves elected in large part from local authorities. This type of composition, as pointed out by Vernon Bogdanor in his article "Reform of the House of Lords: A Sceptical View ", is in fact modelled on the German Bundesrat which gives' the devolved governments formal access to the legislative powers in a reformed second chamber'. The House would hold the same powers as they do at present. ...read more.


Also the expertise offered by these unelected peers ensure worthy scrutiny of the proposals that come from the Commons, as they not only offer independence from bias views but also expertise. The Right Honourable Ian Duncan Smith's proposal indicates a House of 80% elected and only 20% appointed, this would pose as more democratic and representative of the people, however is it desirable that the majority who are elected would have a greater degree of legitimacy when casting their votes? Another pitfall is that the House would be almost equal in say to the House of Commons as it would also be representative of the nation to a large extent. In conclusion it would seem that Lord Wakehams proposals do seem the best option for reform as the Royal Commission has taken into account the fact that the two Houses must not have equal say in a matter, the Commons should prevail, always. This ensures that we would not be in the constitutional crisis of deadlock in Parliament, on disagreement of an issue. The crisis of the present unrepresentative nature of the House of Lords would also be addressed. I believe along with many others that such a reform is the first step to allowing more women and other minority groups into positions of authority, setting an effective and potent example of equality for the rest of the nation to follow. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The House of Commons is a highly effective parliamentary chamber" to what extent do ...

    4 star(s)

    So in relation to this people often say the legislative process is too efficient. An example to back this up would be when Blair had such a big majority, laws introducing tuition fees and foundation hospitals were passed, despite many concerns about them.

  2. The House of Lords, is their need for futher reform?

    Many people feel due to these reasons that there is no real place for the House of Lords in democracy as they fail to properly represent the different groups within British society. Another key issue relating to representation and the House of Lords is that there are bishops and archbishops

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    Decisions may be taken which might anger the public. But may be necessary in the long run. Sometimes politicians may take a gamble in the hopes of a positive outcome. Outline three differences between direct and representative democracy. 1. They differ over the nature of political participation. In a direct democracy the people make policy directly, whereas in a

  2. Explain the limitations on the powers of the House of Lords.

    The Convention ensures that major Government Bills can get through the Lords when the Government of the day has no majority in the Lords. In practice, it means that the Lords does not try to vote down at second or third reading, a Government Bill mentioned in an election manifesto.

  1. "Constitutional reform had gone too far, or not far enough?" Discuss

    Although the Liberal Democrats agree with devolution, many would like to take it a step further and go federal. This is why the Liberal Democrats believe that constitutional reform has not gone far enough when it comes to devolution, as a crossover between devolution and federalism is not yet present.

  2. Is the House of Commons effective at carrying out its various functions?

    This, though good in keeping the MPs in check, also gives considerable power to the Whips. They are therefore able to have power over the MPs through slight blackmail.

  1. To what extent would the coalition's proposals for House of Lords reform have been ...

    This shall be a great loss as it provides a great help to the parliament in understanding complicated topics which is not in their field of knowledge such as stem cells and abortion ( what are moral issues, when does the foetus develop and etc.).

  2. Reforming the Lords - Elected Second Chamber

    This essay will argue that such an extreme change from a largely appointed to an elected system is too unrealistic to be implemented. The House of Lords is commonly referred to as the ?revising chamber? in Parliament as its principal role is to serve as a check on the Government by amending drafted bills.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work