• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

EU Working Language

Extracts from this document...


EU Working Language Its easy to see why the European Union does not so far have a language policy and why every document is transferred from one language to another, even though this means that 21 translations have to take place. While, this may be seen as a problem there are a number of drawbacks that a working European language would bring about. Personally I feel an EU Working Language would mean the loss of a country's main identity and huge lack of diversification. "Each language has a value itself, and it should be preserved, perhaps like a work of art" European identity has tried to always be based round diversity of culture. Culture has been a great pride to Europeans and a large portion of culture is language itself. ...read more.


Or German which has the most native speakers in the European Union? These questions only raise practical issues, the fact that language is a political issue and the choice of elevating one language over the other twenty, may touch a few political and social nerves. Should the European choose a neutral language, like Esperanto? An artificial language based as far as possible on words common to all the European languages but this would then face a pile of practical problems as there aren't many who speak it. At present, translation services cost roughly 800 million Euros per year. While 800 million Euros may seem a rather large figure, the number is tremendously misleading. Currently* the cost of language services at all EU establishments is only 0.8% of the EU's total budget1, amounting to a mere �2 per person annually. ...read more.


This and other similar measures have increased productivity by a massive 40%. Major advances in computer aided translation have also allowed swifter translations and reduced delays, without question newer and furthermore advanced computers will become more available in the not so distant future. Finally, introducing one language would not bring people together, its more likely to divide even more. Besides, a more important principle of the EU is its democracy. Having struggled to tackle the accusations of democratic insufficiency ever since it existence began in 1992. The European Union would be foolish to be seen further restricting democracy within the institutions. The problem could prove to be the closing stages in the EU Parliament where MPs are elected due to political constituency not because of their language skills. On the whole I feel an EU working language would be a catastrophic disaster. Languages are essential to peoples and nations. Language is deep-rooted to identity, culture, and memory. Language erosion is cultural genocide. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    There are also Cartels who keep track on mergers and if firms exploit consumers they can react. A firm like Boots must be aware of these terms or could result in loss of sales and reputation C A description and analysis of the impact of EU social policy In 1989

  2. The Issue of E.U. Enlargement

    None of these enlargements were without problems or controversy. For example, the UK only succeeded in joining in 1973 after having been rejected in its previous bids for membership by French President Charles de Gaulle, while the Spanish and Portugese accessions spawned conflicts over agriculture and the budget 1.

  1. Back ground information about the EU

    Treaty of Amsterdam 1997 This treaty was approved by the European council in Amsterdam, in 1997 and come into force in 1999. The treaty had the main objective to modify certain regulations of the Treaty of the European Union, the constituent treaties of the European Communities (Paris and Rome)

  2. Listed below are the main results obtained from the marketing research study. Contained in ...

    Political The industry in Belgium is concentrated in the northern Flemish area although the government is encouraging business into the south of Belgium which is good news for new investors like ourselves. Belgium has few natural resources and imports substantial quantities of raw materials, again good news for importers.

  1. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    This treaty helped to create jobs, improve border checks and the protection of the environment. Opportunities and threats for UK business Today, over �130 billion of Britain's trade is with the European Union and 3 million people employed as of the European Union.

  2. Introduction to EU enlargement.

    The enlargement will bring both challenge and opportunities to EU. Benefit: In the economic term, the member states are no longer in the position to solve their problems alone. The economic imparities among the member states will be diminished, and Europe can take advantage of the opening up of the internal markets and the economic integration.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work