• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

EU Working Language

Extracts from this document...


EU Working Language Its easy to see why the European Union does not so far have a language policy and why every document is transferred from one language to another, even though this means that 21 translations have to take place. While, this may be seen as a problem there are a number of drawbacks that a working European language would bring about. Personally I feel an EU Working Language would mean the loss of a country's main identity and huge lack of diversification. "Each language has a value itself, and it should be preserved, perhaps like a work of art" European identity has tried to always be based round diversity of culture. Culture has been a great pride to Europeans and a large portion of culture is language itself. ...read more.


Or German which has the most native speakers in the European Union? These questions only raise practical issues, the fact that language is a political issue and the choice of elevating one language over the other twenty, may touch a few political and social nerves. Should the European choose a neutral language, like Esperanto? An artificial language based as far as possible on words common to all the European languages but this would then face a pile of practical problems as there aren't many who speak it. At present, translation services cost roughly 800 million Euros per year. While 800 million Euros may seem a rather large figure, the number is tremendously misleading. Currently* the cost of language services at all EU establishments is only 0.8% of the EU's total budget1, amounting to a mere �2 per person annually. ...read more.


This and other similar measures have increased productivity by a massive 40%. Major advances in computer aided translation have also allowed swifter translations and reduced delays, without question newer and furthermore advanced computers will become more available in the not so distant future. Finally, introducing one language would not bring people together, its more likely to divide even more. Besides, a more important principle of the EU is its democracy. Having struggled to tackle the accusations of democratic insufficiency ever since it existence began in 1992. The European Union would be foolish to be seen further restricting democracy within the institutions. The problem could prove to be the closing stages in the EU Parliament where MPs are elected due to political constituency not because of their language skills. On the whole I feel an EU working language would be a catastrophic disaster. Languages are essential to peoples and nations. Language is deep-rooted to identity, culture, and memory. Language erosion is cultural genocide. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    There are also Cartels who keep track on mergers and if firms exploit consumers they can react. A firm like Boots must be aware of these terms or could result in loss of sales and reputation C A description and analysis of the impact of EU social policy In 1989

  2. The Issue of E.U. Enlargement

    None of these enlargements were without problems or controversy. For example, the UK only succeeded in joining in 1973 after having been rejected in its previous bids for membership by French President Charles de Gaulle, while the Spanish and Portugese accessions spawned conflicts over agriculture and the budget 1.

  1. The French Revolution

    Raw materials and finished products could be moved more quickly and cheaply than before. Improved transportation also allowed new ideas to spread quickly. During the Industrial Revolution, the social structure of society changed dramatically. Before the Revolution most people lived in small villages, working either in agriculture or as skilled craftsmen.

  2. Back ground information about the EU

    and of some acts related to them. It did not substitute the previous treaties, but added to them Since the Maastricht Treaty, was ratified by most of the countries in the European Union, Europe has continued to move on, from the Treaty of Amsterdam that came into effect in 1999

  1. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    Single currency has helped Boots as foreign suppliers are willing to trade as no extra costs but UK not being a member Boots in UK is making less profits as from the one in the Single currency states.12 members have adopted the single currency and by doing are paying less costs and increases in profits.

  2. Listed below are the main results obtained from the marketing research study. Contained in ...

    Legal Belgium comes under the same standards set for all EU member states so as such it is virtually the same as the UK and there are no trading barriers. Economic Belgium is a modern private enterprise economy, which benefits from its central location.

  1. Introduction to EU enlargement.

    The enlargement will bring both challenge and opportunities to EU. Benefit: In the economic term, the member states are no longer in the position to solve their problems alone. The economic imparities among the member states will be diminished, and Europe can take advantage of the opening up of the internal markets and the economic integration.

  2. The doctrine of essential facilities

    In a subsequent case, MCI Communication v. American AT&T Co.,4 concerning a single firm conduct and brought under section 2 of the Sherman Act, the Court of Appeal identified four indispensable elements for the establishment of liability under the doctrine: 1) control of the essential facility by a monopolist; 2)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work