• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

European Integration and National Political Systems.

Extracts from this document...


Introduction: European Integration and National Political Systems Simon Hix and Klaus H. Goetz European integration and domestic political change - European integration should be analyzed as an explanatory factor in domestic political continuity or change - The study of national political systems has evolved largely in isolation from the study of European integration for three main reasons: 1. the separation has been a natural product of a division of labor in the discipline of political science: between comparative politics, with its focus on domestic political institutions and processes, and international relations, with its focus on international regimes and regional integration 2. Many scholars of comparative European politics have taken a healthily skeptical attitude to the study of European integration - as either a normative project or as not contributing much to generalisable political science knowledge 3. as long as the empirical impact of European integration on national politics was seemingly small, it could be ignored as a relevant variable - This position is no longer sustainable. With the growing development of the "multi-level" European polity, the disciplinary boundary between comparative politics and international relations is increasingly porous. - The key question asked is what has been the impact of European integration on government and politics in domestic political systems. What is European integration? "European integration comprises two inter-related processes: the delegation of policy competences to the supranational level to achieve particular polity outcomes; and the establishment of a new set of political institutions, with executive, legislative and judicial powers" National Policy Delegation and European-Level Political ...read more.


EU law are individual citizens rather than the EU statesand that the EU Treaty and secondary legislation are part of the domestic law of the member states - "supremacy" means that if there is a conflict between domestic law and EU law, then EU law is sovereign 4. lobbyism: over 1.000 lobby groups have offices in Brussels with the specific aim of trying to influence the EU policy process. The fact that the Commission is understaffed, requires policy expertise in the highly technical process of harmonizing the diverse European market, and needs the support of certain constituencies for legislation to pass the Council and the EP, ensures relatively open access for private interests at a very early stage of the policy process European Outcomes: New constraints, Reinforcements and Catalysts Political outcomes at the European level have both direct and indirect impacts on domestic political systems: 1. direct impacts are outcomes that require domestic policies to be changed to conform to new European-wide norms 2. More interesting for the present study is the indirect impact of European governance outcomes on domestic political institutions and input processes in domestic political systems: a) European governance outcomes have a significant indirect impact on institutional processes - In the area of administration European integration propels member states to introduce new regulatory policy styles - In the field of judicial politics, the institutional design of the EU legal system, which allows national courts to apply EU law, strengthens the judicial review powers of national courts vis-�-vis domestic executives b) ...read more.


Europeanization tends to be discussed in substantive term, while the procedural characteristics, which can only be adequately grasped from a longer term perspective, are often neglected Explaining the European Effect: Varieties of Institutionalism Four main categories for institutionalist explanatory accounts: 1. explanations that operate principally at a macro-institutional level and conceive of both European integration and, in particular, the national effect primarily in institutional terms 2. accounts that adopt a broad understanding of institutions, but again understand the European effect primarily in institutional terms 3. studies that stress individual utility calculations in explaining European effects 4. analyses that likewise emphasize individual behavior, but refer to a "logic of appropriateness" in explaining patterns of national reaction to European integration Conclusion To summarize in order to advance beyond the present state of the analysis of the domestic impacts of European integration, the analytical and theoretical reach of this emergent field of comparative research needs to be broadened in several directions: 1. the present emphasis on policy and institutional aspects needs to be complemented by more sustained efforts at examining the domestic political effects of integration 2. in studying the European impact, substantive effects can only be properly understood if more systematic attention is paid to the modes and processes of domestic Europeanization 3. While it is necessary to disentangle European integration as an explanatory variable and the European effect as a dependent variable, both will need to be "re-entangled" if we wish to do justice to the real-life interdependency of forces of economic, political and cultural change ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    By being in the European Union a country can acquire these benefits, which can help to improve trade and growth. The 15 member states of the European Union are: Austria Belgium Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Portugal Spain Sweden United Kingdom (B)

  2. Which EU institution is the most powerful

    It "...serves three main functions in today's EC legal system: It helps ensure that EU institutions do not exceed their authority; it helps resolve disputes between EU institutions and between member states; and it helps to ensure national compliance with EC law.

  1. The Institutional Consequences of Domestic Politics on Africa's International Relations and Regional Cooperation.

    The culture of French territories were completely destroyed and lost in French tradition. Africans had little or no hand in the exploitation and management of their economic resources. Africans complained of racial discrimination and colour bar in many areas of human endeavor.

  2. To what extent were Political and Economic reasons responsible for post 1945 European Integration.

    In 1955 in Messina, Italy a conference was held between the leaders of the ECSC to try to work together to unite Europe. They believed that certain fusion of economies would be beneficial to all, the first ideas of a common market.

  1. An Analysis of the Powers of the European Parliament.

    The Amsterdam treaty confirmed the EP as a travelling circus since the EP has its seat in Strasbourg where the 12 periods of monthly plenary sessions including the budgetary session is held. The periods of additional sessions are to be held in Brussels and the general Secretariat of the EP

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    On this reading, its significance must be seen at the symbolic level. For some, it could be the symbolism of accountability and democracy. But then, why so empty? There is another possibility. In its rhetoric Maastricht appropriated the deepest symbols of statehood: citizenship, defense, foreign policy -- the rhetoric of a superstate.

  1. Examine the reasons for the different attitudes to European integration in Denmark, Finland, Norway ...

    Unlike most small member states, Denmark does not regard the Commission as a natural ally, which is connected with Denmark's basic view of the EU as an intergovernmental co-operation between independent states rather than a supranational co-operation heralding a political union.

  2. Who other than the governments of state, do you consider to be significant actors ...

    It could be considered to be acting in an aggressive and dangerous manner and with the biggest nuclear arsenal on earth, somewhat hypocritical when declaring its intentions to rid the world of Saddam Hussein because of the threat he and Iraq pose to world peace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work