• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

European Union Lobbying.

Extracts from this document...


EUROPEAN UNION LOBBYING Introduction Today we are going to look very superficially at lobbying the European Union institutions. We'll begin with a quick run through the basic policy making structures of the EU (but it is only very much an introduction; if you want more detailed information on any of the topics raised there are several useful textbooks in the Library) and then in the second half I'll discuss how these processes impact upon the practice of public affairs and how lobbyists are regulated in the EU. To begin with an idea about the scale of lobbying that goes on in the EU institutions - in 1992 the European Commission estimated that there were perhaps 10,000 people representing 3,000 groups who were involved in lobbying the Commission, Parliament and Council of Ministers. The European Parliament In its early days, the European Parliament was made up of appointed Members, but it has been entirely directly elected since 1979. The Parliament holds its full plenary sessions in Strasbourg (for one week a month), meetings of its committees take place in Brussels (over two weeks a month), and its administrative departments are based in Luxembourg. The 626 MEPs are generally elected as party politicians, although a few independents will always manage to get elected. However, once elected the MEP will usually join a particular political grouping within the Parliament. So, for instance, Labour MEPs from the UK are members of the European Parliament's Socialist Group. Other major grouping include the Greens, the European People's Party, and the Liberal and Democratic Reformists. These broad coalitions allow like-minded MEPs from across all EU nations to coalesce on policy issues. They are less cohesive and disciplined than parties in national parliaments, but do nevertheless allow some co-ordination to take place. (Do also keep in mind that under the EU's plans for enlargement which we will deal with in more detail later, the size of the Parliament will increase as new nations join the Union; however, it is the intention ...read more.


The European Council provides a forum in which not only the internal development of the Union can be discussed but also the EU's relationship with external bodies. So the meetings will allow the EU to devise a common negotiating position when dealing collectively with, for instance, the United States or Japan, the United Nations or World Trade Organisation. While the European Council is in a sense the place where the EU's most senior politicians arrive at decisions, if these require European legislation it is unable to simply insist that the policies be adopted and implemented immediately because any necessary legislation must go through the normal process which we will consider next week. However, the heads of government are obviously able to make final political decisions and implement those unilaterally if they do not require legislative backing. One academic has concluded that, "The record of the European Council is mixed. On the one hand there have been failures, or at least the non-fulfilment of hopes. This was particularly true in the period from about 1980 to 1988: summits became rather routinised and immersed in detail; too much time was devoted to policy detail rather than to mapping out the future; and disputes about distributional issues were seemingly always on the agenda. On the other hand there have been positive achievements: understandings between national leaders have been furthered; important goals have been identified/given an impetus/brought to a conclusion (such as on enlargements, the internal market, the social dimension, institutional reform, and EMU); and agreements have been worked out on matters that were either unsuitable for, or could not be resolved by, the Council of Ministers." The EU legislative process and lobbying Broadly speaking, formal proposals for EU legislation are initially made by the European Commission (although some proposals may have started out as recommendations to the Commission by the Parliament). So the Commission issues a proposal which is subject to consultation by the Parliament and the Council of Ministers. ...read more.


Ford's report quite consciously avoided providing any rigid definition of who constituted a lobbyist - rather anyone who had occasion to visit the Parliament building on a regular basis would be covered by his register. The idea here was that the less complex was the scheme suggested, the more chance it would have of being accepted. However after the report was drafted (on behalf of the Committee on Rules of Procedure), it was submitted to a number of other standing Committees for their consideration. One of these - the Committee on Social Affairs and Employment - decided that the report should include provisions relating to the acceptance by MEPs of financial assistance from outside groups. Once these two issues became linked - lobbying and the regulation of members' interests - the Ford report was in serious trouble. In January 1996 the Parliament debated Ford's report and referred it back to the CRP committee for revision. Finally in July 1996, a compromise of sorts was reached so that MEPs now have to declare their outside interests while lobbyists would be registered by the Parliament in return for obtaining a pass provided that they signed a code of conduct. This scheme came into force in June 1999. The code of conduct which lobbyists must adhere to is fairly basic. In fact, though, the code does not define lobbying. It simply states that the register and code will apply to all those who are issued passes to the European Parliament on the basis that they "wish to enter Parliament's premises frequently with a view to supplying information to Members within the framework of their parliamentary mandate in their own interests or those of third parties". Among its provisions are that lobbyists shall: * "state the interest or interests they represent in contact with Members of Parliament, their staff or officials of Parliament; * refrain from any action designed to obtain information dishonestly; * not claim any formal relationship with Parliament in any dealings with third parties; * not circulate for a profit to third parties copies of documents obtained from Parliament". ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Consequences of lack of self discipline:Here I am going to look at the police ...

    Performance: the general public need to know that if they ever are in need of the public services they can count on them to perform to the best of their ability.

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    The Germans have adopted the single currency and the country has the unmissable museums and art galleries. The majority of Germans class them selves of being Catholic, there are also other religions such as Islam and Judaism. German is considered to be the second most richest country in the world with one of the most effective education systems.

  1. What Are The Functions Of The Four EU Institutions? How Are European Laws Made?

    Any countries that do not follow the word of the treaties get sanctions, if they do not abide by the ECJs decision. The commission implements the budget of the EU by managing it, even though it is national and social authorities that usually spend the money.

  2. The Foreign Policy of Great Britain in relationship to the European Union.

    According to the Prime Minister this relationship has been so due to gross misjudgments, hesitation, alienation, incomprehension'3. Post-war Britain looked at the EU as a method to keep France and Germany from going back to war with each other. Britain's initial role therefore was that of a benign friend encouraging the former enemies to work together.

  1. Free essay

    Finnish Party System

    The mission of the party convention is to make decisions on important questions of principles and policy positions. The convention adopts the rules and programs of the party and elects members of the representative body, which exercises power in the period between party conventions.

  2. Will examine the effects membership of the European Union or EU has had on ...

    the Eurozone will not have to endure the costs of exchanging profits back into their home currency. The main argument against is simply that joining the Euro means handing over control to the EU regarding our monetary policy. The Three Main Institutions of the European Union The Council for the

  1. E-Business Report: Suicide Girls

    The result is that the content is attractive and members are increasingly loyal since they can see that their postings are on the site and also receive rewards in the form of points. The points reward scheme satisfies their second hypothesis that value can be added through member loyalty.

  2. How important is the European Parliament?

    The threat is not made with the intention of internally reprimanding the Commission but publically humiliating the President and his Commissioners: it is an external threat so as to make the public more aware of the EU and perhaps to act as an example to other EU institutions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work