• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate pluralism as a theory of presentation and explain how the theory is significant in terms of the state and the individual.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate pluralism as a theory of presentation and explain how the theory is significant in terms of the state and the individual. Pluralism is a structuralist theory. It is the situation within the state or social organisations in which power is shared among a number of groups and organisations. This is a key characteristic of liberal democratic political systems in which power can be openly competed for rather than being concentrated in the hands of a small group of people who constitute a ruling elite. Some pluralist theorists emphasise the importance that pressure groups have in liberal democratic political systems. These are viewed as a key mechanism through which public opinion can influence the decision making process. A pluralist society is one in which citizens are organised into a variety of interest groups that compete with one another. This process occurs within a state, which is independent of the class interests. And is superintendent by the government that adjudicates in the constant competing between groups and interests, seeking to assert the public interest Pluralism is a political sociological theory that is based on structuralism. ...read more.

Middle

Power consists of the relationship between two parties in which one has the ability to compel the other to undertake a course of action that would not be voluntary have been carried out. Governments use power over their citizens but other political organisations may use power as their ability to use force or violence to further their aims. In liberal democracies governments use both power and authority. They are obeyed partly due to the general consent that they have the right to govern. Power that is not from authority is likely to cause violence, disorder or revolution. Pluralists attempt to explain the liberal democracy system as a way in which power can be competed for and not from the constituted ruling elite. From a liberal democracy this equals capitalism, ruling elite and class divisions. Pluralists maintain that power in society is assumed as fixed in Max Webers model of power, which sees the fundamental source of power in society within its members. It also sees power in society as defused and fragmented, represented in many sources. Pluralism has many criticisms these include that it gives a short shrift to those who are not organised. ...read more.

Conclusion

The third face of power strays even further from an emphasis on decision making and the preferences expressed by members of society. Luke's claims that power can be exercised by shaping desires of social groups. A social group may be persuaded to accept or even to desire a situation that is harmful to them. Having examined the nature of power, Luke's is able to conclude that power can be defined by saying that ' A exercises over B when A affects B in a manner contray to B's interests.' In other words, Luke's argued that power is exercised over those who are harmed by its use, whether they are aware they are being harmed or not. Luke has been responsible for refining the concept of power, and showing that it has more than one dimension. As he himself admits, though, what is in a persons interests, or what is good for them, is ultimately a matter of opinion. Marxists and other conflict theorists have suggested that pluralists ignore some aspects of power. In particular it is argued that they concentrate exclusively on the first face of power. There are some criticisms that pluralists ignore the possibility that some have the power to prevent certain issues from reaching the point of decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the pluralist, elitist and Marxist theories of the state.

    It is believed that a common ownership of production would create a class who share the same basic structural position and therefore, they have an interest in ensuring their position is maintained. It stands to follow that as a result the Marxist view of the state is that it upholds

  2. Marx and Weber - Theories of the state

    Marx referred to democracy as "bourgeois democracy", it was a fraud behind which the capitalist class governed or ruled. Marx's theory of the state concentrated solely on a capitalist society and consisted of a number of political institutions such as government, the education system, the monarchy, the legal system and

  1. Compare and Contrast pluralist and ruling elites accounts of political power

    The elites deem that elite power "comes from control of the highest positions in the political and business hierarchy" and that this power has been enhanced "by the close collaboration of political industrial and military organizations" (both, (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com /APGOV_Power_Elite.htm)

  2. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    merely perceived) interests. Utilitarianism may be incompatible with a principle of justice. A serious problem for utilitarianism comes in trying to respond to the following question. "Utilitarianism requires that we do that action which produces the most amount of good (in the proper time period).

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    6. According to Luke (1996), sovereign states are rational self-seeking actors which are resolutely, if not exclusively, concerned with relative gains because they must function in an anarchial environment in which their security and well-being ultimately rest on their ability to mobilise resources against external threats.

  2. Deontology- a theory based purely on obligation or duty.

    If, however, a person broke this social contract by killing that sacred creature, the cow, that act would be regarded as wrong even if the population were starving, with no other source of food. A deontologist would find this act unquestionably wrong, no matter the outcome or consequence, because this person indubitably did not act according to the rules.

  1. If the state is not a voluntary organisation, how can one be under any ...

    Wolff writes that Bentham considered "the primary value is not autonomy but happiness ... whether we consent to the state is irrelevant."5 This utilitarian argument is that the 'happiness' of society, as a whole is of more value than personal autonomy or the happiness of the few or one.

  2. A Study of Carl Rogers' Theory of Personality

    The needs for positive regard from others and positive self-regard would match organismic evaluation and there would be congruence between self and experience, with full psychological adjustment as a result (Rogers, 1959). This ideal human condition is embodied in the "fully functioning person" who is open to experience able to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work