• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate pluralism as a theory of presentation and explain how the theory is significant in terms of the state and the individual.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate pluralism as a theory of presentation and explain how the theory is significant in terms of the state and the individual. Pluralism is a structuralist theory. It is the situation within the state or social organisations in which power is shared among a number of groups and organisations. This is a key characteristic of liberal democratic political systems in which power can be openly competed for rather than being concentrated in the hands of a small group of people who constitute a ruling elite. Some pluralist theorists emphasise the importance that pressure groups have in liberal democratic political systems. These are viewed as a key mechanism through which public opinion can influence the decision making process. A pluralist society is one in which citizens are organised into a variety of interest groups that compete with one another. This process occurs within a state, which is independent of the class interests. And is superintendent by the government that adjudicates in the constant competing between groups and interests, seeking to assert the public interest Pluralism is a political sociological theory that is based on structuralism. ...read more.

Middle

Power consists of the relationship between two parties in which one has the ability to compel the other to undertake a course of action that would not be voluntary have been carried out. Governments use power over their citizens but other political organisations may use power as their ability to use force or violence to further their aims. In liberal democracies governments use both power and authority. They are obeyed partly due to the general consent that they have the right to govern. Power that is not from authority is likely to cause violence, disorder or revolution. Pluralists attempt to explain the liberal democracy system as a way in which power can be competed for and not from the constituted ruling elite. From a liberal democracy this equals capitalism, ruling elite and class divisions. Pluralists maintain that power in society is assumed as fixed in Max Webers model of power, which sees the fundamental source of power in society within its members. It also sees power in society as defused and fragmented, represented in many sources. Pluralism has many criticisms these include that it gives a short shrift to those who are not organised. ...read more.

Conclusion

The third face of power strays even further from an emphasis on decision making and the preferences expressed by members of society. Luke's claims that power can be exercised by shaping desires of social groups. A social group may be persuaded to accept or even to desire a situation that is harmful to them. Having examined the nature of power, Luke's is able to conclude that power can be defined by saying that ' A exercises over B when A affects B in a manner contray to B's interests.' In other words, Luke's argued that power is exercised over those who are harmed by its use, whether they are aware they are being harmed or not. Luke has been responsible for refining the concept of power, and showing that it has more than one dimension. As he himself admits, though, what is in a persons interests, or what is good for them, is ultimately a matter of opinion. Marxists and other conflict theorists have suggested that pluralists ignore some aspects of power. In particular it is argued that they concentrate exclusively on the first face of power. There are some criticisms that pluralists ignore the possibility that some have the power to prevent certain issues from reaching the point of decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the pluralist, elitist and Marxist theories of the state.

    It must be pointed out that Dahl was deeply opposed to the fact that power was held in the elite. In his empirical study of New Haven, Dahl couldn't gather "enough to suggest that a socio-economic elite [had] some kind some kind of covert monopoly of power."5 He took the

  2. Can feminism be thought of as a theory of law or, otherwise, fundamental in ...

    is to promote the "dissatisfactions of a wide spectrum of women," which highlight the general inequality felt by women in regards to legal and social equality. Therefore critical legal studies, instead of acting as a definition, are rather a useful means of indicating the "explicit and implicit male orientation of

  1. Marx and Weber - Theories of the state

    Marx referred to democracy as "bourgeois democracy", it was a fraud behind which the capitalist class governed or ruled. Marx's theory of the state concentrated solely on a capitalist society and consisted of a number of political institutions such as government, the education system, the monarchy, the legal system and

  2. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    one might argue that some things, e.g., love, beauty, friendship, are good, no matter whether they are desired or not. Welfare consequentialism, which identifies utility with the satisfaction of interests rather than mere preferences. Problem: it's hard to come up with a list of "true" (vs.

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    The same rules are cited for land as for the produce of land." The making of currency as an unspoilable property and medium for exchange seems to have by-passed this limit all together. Inequality becomes rampant and as such an authority is needed to protect a man's property and the social peace.

  2. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    "Finding no meaning in their working lives, they become obsessed with material possessions and work harder and harder in order to acquire more and more." (Tovey & Share, 2000:12) This statement supports Marx's view that social change is often materialist.

  1. Compare and Contrast pluralist and ruling elites accounts of political power

    Because Pluralists think there is a diversity of interests "no one is all-powerful" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com /APGOV_Pluralism.htm) as each group is too small to bear more influence than another so all groups are equal. Therefore elitists think that modern politics emphasises inequality and dominance whereas pluralists believes it protects it through diversity.

  2. What are the dilemmas of a pluralist democracy?

    has argued that in order to be politically effective, the state must be able to separate itself routinely from ruling-class factions. (Held p.220) As Poulantzas wrote: 'the direct participation of members of the capitalist class in the state apparatus and in government, even where it exists, is not the important side of the matter (p.245).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work