• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate pluralism as a theory of presentation and explain how the theory is significant in terms of the state and the individual.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate pluralism as a theory of presentation and explain how the theory is significant in terms of the state and the individual. Pluralism is a structuralist theory. It is the situation within the state or social organisations in which power is shared among a number of groups and organisations. This is a key characteristic of liberal democratic political systems in which power can be openly competed for rather than being concentrated in the hands of a small group of people who constitute a ruling elite. Some pluralist theorists emphasise the importance that pressure groups have in liberal democratic political systems. These are viewed as a key mechanism through which public opinion can influence the decision making process. A pluralist society is one in which citizens are organised into a variety of interest groups that compete with one another. This process occurs within a state, which is independent of the class interests. And is superintendent by the government that adjudicates in the constant competing between groups and interests, seeking to assert the public interest Pluralism is a political sociological theory that is based on structuralism. ...read more.

Middle

Power consists of the relationship between two parties in which one has the ability to compel the other to undertake a course of action that would not be voluntary have been carried out. Governments use power over their citizens but other political organisations may use power as their ability to use force or violence to further their aims. In liberal democracies governments use both power and authority. They are obeyed partly due to the general consent that they have the right to govern. Power that is not from authority is likely to cause violence, disorder or revolution. Pluralists attempt to explain the liberal democracy system as a way in which power can be competed for and not from the constituted ruling elite. From a liberal democracy this equals capitalism, ruling elite and class divisions. Pluralists maintain that power in society is assumed as fixed in Max Webers model of power, which sees the fundamental source of power in society within its members. It also sees power in society as defused and fragmented, represented in many sources. Pluralism has many criticisms these include that it gives a short shrift to those who are not organised. ...read more.

Conclusion

The third face of power strays even further from an emphasis on decision making and the preferences expressed by members of society. Luke's claims that power can be exercised by shaping desires of social groups. A social group may be persuaded to accept or even to desire a situation that is harmful to them. Having examined the nature of power, Luke's is able to conclude that power can be defined by saying that ' A exercises over B when A affects B in a manner contray to B's interests.' In other words, Luke's argued that power is exercised over those who are harmed by its use, whether they are aware they are being harmed or not. Luke has been responsible for refining the concept of power, and showing that it has more than one dimension. As he himself admits, though, what is in a persons interests, or what is good for them, is ultimately a matter of opinion. Marxists and other conflict theorists have suggested that pluralists ignore some aspects of power. In particular it is argued that they concentrate exclusively on the first face of power. There are some criticisms that pluralists ignore the possibility that some have the power to prevent certain issues from reaching the point of decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the pluralist, elitist and Marxist theories of the state.

    It is believed that a common ownership of production would create a class who share the same basic structural position and therefore, they have an interest in ensuring their position is maintained. It stands to follow that as a result the Marxist view of the state is that it upholds

  2. Compare and Contrast pluralist and ruling elites accounts of political power

    their basic thesis is that power is controlled and derived through collaboration amongst themselves. Opposingly pluralists deem that competition allows democracy as previously mentioned. Pluralists also cannot comprehend that people will not express their opinions, so will become members of interest groups which thus lets equality flourish.

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    merely perceived) interests. Utilitarianism may be incompatible with a principle of justice. A serious problem for utilitarianism comes in trying to respond to the following question. "Utilitarianism requires that we do that action which produces the most amount of good (in the proper time period).

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    With the advent of money as unspoilable property, certain inequalities amoungst men would develop. Those with less start to feel cheated and used. This is very dangerous for those with more, because with these inequalities, comes the danger of theft, or injury to property or body.

  1. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    "Finding no meaning in their working lives, they become obsessed with material possessions and work harder and harder in order to acquire more and more." (Tovey & Share, 2000:12) This statement supports Marx's view that social change is often materialist.

  2. A Study of Carl Rogers' Theory of Personality

    The needs for positive regard from others and positive self-regard would match organismic evaluation and there would be congruence between self and experience, with full psychological adjustment as a result (Rogers, 1959). This ideal human condition is embodied in the "fully functioning person" who is open to experience able to

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    As I have suggested, this pyramid is not just one of positions and authority but also of command and control. That is, as long as the pyramid remains a pyramid, even slightly, it is a power arrangement governed by

  2. Deontology- a theory based purely on obligation or duty.

    Within societies, people subconsciously agree to social contracts. The idea of these social contracts is a direct effect of deontology. When a person agrees to live in a certain society or culture, they are also agreeing to a certain set of unavoidable rules, being that they are written or unwritten.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work