• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the different interpretations of the role of the state

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate the different interpretations of the role of the state There are many different views about what the role of the state is and should be. All mainstream parties have concluded that there is some need for welfare provisions in a modern day liberal democracy. However with historical variations to each ideology it is sometime difficult to group an ideology as one. Also many variations agree with other ideological variations. The role of the state is a controversial issue with many differing ideas. Traditional conservatism stresses the importance of a strong state in order to maintain and uphold society. Authority and tradition are embedded in the state and act as the state to hold it together. Although Burke is a strong advocator of this view it is clear that from such a role the state could become a totalitarian state, especially with Conservatives believing that being born into society simply means you must follow its rule. A criticism of this view would be found in classical liberal ideology, with theorists such as Locke and Hobbs that would argue that by having a strong state individual freedoms were being eroded away. ...read more.

Middle

Green and Hohouse call for a need for a welfare state to free those who are exploited through industrialisation. It answers the criticism of Classical liberalism, that doesn't provide any safe guard against social inequality, by providing a welfare state. It also avoids the possibility of unrest and revolution from the lower orders. Anarchists would argue that no state is required and put trust in the good nature of humans in running a society. I agree to some extent with Paine (classical liberal) that the state is a 'necessary evil' but I see the state as more of a safety net, there to protect when needed. Modern liberals believe that a welfare state answers the question of removing social inequalities, where as Marxists believe that removing the state initially is the answer. By radically redistributing wealth among society and eventually dissolving the state, it aims to eradicate an unfair class system, as it sees itself. However in order to achieve this stateless state, a strong state is required in order to implement it! ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion there is a clear consensus that a welfare state has its merits in a liberal democracy. It is the modern liberal approach, that both one-nation conservatism and social democrats have been influenced by, that protects its citizens whilst still allowing them individual freedoms. Although there is a clear argument that by imposing a welfare state individual freedoms are eroded but this is a small price to pay in order to protect against rebellion and unrest. But as Hobhouse and Green would highlight, a welfare state s needed to protect the individual freedoms that are eroded away through free capitalist societies. Although social democrats have a strength to their argument for a full remake of the economy and the framework of society I believe this goes too far. To remove the class system, would be to remove tradition and that is not necessary in order to protect individual freedoms, it could even go some way to eroding them further. A welfare state that doesn't seek to become a 'nanny' state such as one-nation conservatism, but one that puts protection of individual freedoms at the forefront of its ideas would be a desirable way to run a state. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    He believed that by defining good, important aspects or meanings are missed out, so by not defining them, they stay as they are. Utilitarianism sees that everybody's duty is to do what is best for the majority. It is allowing for the well being of the majority to rule over the minority.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    a government carries out in a way that is consistent with his very foundation for the purposes instituting a government without running contrary to it. Locke runs into many of these problems when he tries to justify the characteristics that the existing economy has.

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    of the population, and if government were to go too far then the majority would restrict its intervention. That relationship described above is another example of how capitalism and democracy are linked.(Pious) At this point the interconnectedness of capitalism and democracy has been established and the counterarguments to this refuted.

  2. To what extent is Marxism a flawed political ideology?

    circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from the past." One defender of Marx, Friedrich Engels argued this point when he said that "if someone twists this into saying that the economic base is the only determining one, he transforms that proposition into a meaningless, abstract and senseless phrase."

  1. What are the main ideological principles of the conservatives, Labour and Liberal democrats? To ...

    I do not however believe that their ideological shift can still be perceived as left. Although people say that "New" Labour ideas still link with the ethical socialism principles from origins I do not. If "New Labour" was communitarianism then it would not have spent the billions of pounds sending

  2. Breaking down the Walls: A Discourse of Ideology and "Otherness"

    Again, like Wright, I too lived this same experience. I lived in a world where it was now obvious that people of differing skin shades were seemingly born to live, breathe, and act a certain way. Like Wright, I was exposed daily to people of my color and differing colors,

  1. Politics A: Analysing Theories of the State and Individual - Hobbes and Locke

    Locke felt if institutions like the state and the legal system were necessary, then it was because a few stupid or evil people insisted on exceeding their natural rights and taking the life and property of others. To protect against this happening, it was necessary for peace loving respecters of

  2. Can a plausible case be made for participatory democracy under modern conditions?

    Representation appears to be the obvious solution in modern society to the problem of a large-scale functioning democracy but we can ask to what extent direct participation can be accommodated under these conditions where representation appears widely necessary. If we take Rousseau's theory of a fully participatory democracy which he

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work