• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the different interpretations of the role of the state

Extracts from this document...


Evaluate the different interpretations of the role of the state There are many different views about what the role of the state is and should be. All mainstream parties have concluded that there is some need for welfare provisions in a modern day liberal democracy. However with historical variations to each ideology it is sometime difficult to group an ideology as one. Also many variations agree with other ideological variations. The role of the state is a controversial issue with many differing ideas. Traditional conservatism stresses the importance of a strong state in order to maintain and uphold society. Authority and tradition are embedded in the state and act as the state to hold it together. Although Burke is a strong advocator of this view it is clear that from such a role the state could become a totalitarian state, especially with Conservatives believing that being born into society simply means you must follow its rule. A criticism of this view would be found in classical liberal ideology, with theorists such as Locke and Hobbs that would argue that by having a strong state individual freedoms were being eroded away. ...read more.


Green and Hohouse call for a need for a welfare state to free those who are exploited through industrialisation. It answers the criticism of Classical liberalism, that doesn't provide any safe guard against social inequality, by providing a welfare state. It also avoids the possibility of unrest and revolution from the lower orders. Anarchists would argue that no state is required and put trust in the good nature of humans in running a society. I agree to some extent with Paine (classical liberal) that the state is a 'necessary evil' but I see the state as more of a safety net, there to protect when needed. Modern liberals believe that a welfare state answers the question of removing social inequalities, where as Marxists believe that removing the state initially is the answer. By radically redistributing wealth among society and eventually dissolving the state, it aims to eradicate an unfair class system, as it sees itself. However in order to achieve this stateless state, a strong state is required in order to implement it! ...read more.


In conclusion there is a clear consensus that a welfare state has its merits in a liberal democracy. It is the modern liberal approach, that both one-nation conservatism and social democrats have been influenced by, that protects its citizens whilst still allowing them individual freedoms. Although there is a clear argument that by imposing a welfare state individual freedoms are eroded but this is a small price to pay in order to protect against rebellion and unrest. But as Hobhouse and Green would highlight, a welfare state s needed to protect the individual freedoms that are eroded away through free capitalist societies. Although social democrats have a strength to their argument for a full remake of the economy and the framework of society I believe this goes too far. To remove the class system, would be to remove tradition and that is not necessary in order to protect individual freedoms, it could even go some way to eroding them further. A welfare state that doesn't seek to become a 'nanny' state such as one-nation conservatism, but one that puts protection of individual freedoms at the forefront of its ideas would be a desirable way to run a state. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    Also, we do not know how long the result will last for. Hume argued for this statement: "The effects of an action form part of a chain that stretches into the indefinite future. Here is always the possibility that a very positive result of an action may subsequently lead to very negative consequences."

  2. To what extent is Marxism a flawed political ideology?

    and the ruling class (bourgeoisie). Marx argued that once humans had created a society whereby they had the basic necessities needed for survival, one person or group would eventually seize control. This developed into a society consisting of slaves and slave owners, whereby production motivation was based solely on the need for trade, not profit.

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    reason for entering civil society, it follows that it cannot be a legitimate act of government to appropriate, through taxation, the possessions of its subjects without their consent. This seems to require the individual express consent of each property owner, since it differs from the transfer of the rights of judging and punishing in a most important sense.

  2. Why did the New Liberals attach so much importance to the reform of social ...

    Their ability to use legal freedoms granted by Classical Liberalism had reached a peak in advancing their economic and social freedom. Without economic aid they could go no further. Charles Masterman, a Cambridge graduate became one of the growing numbers of middle class investigators into the slum areas of Britain's cities.

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    The ekklesia must also have delegated a most of the day-to-day business of state to the appropriate boards or individuals because it might have been unfeasible or a body of that size to look after such matters properly. On the other hand, all state officials were acutely aware that, at

  2. What are the main ideological principles of the conservatives, Labour and Liberal democrats? To ...

    If anything it is definitely more centrist than left and Eysenck's model shows a fairer representation of the Labour party in terms of ideology. Therefore I believe the party still maintain their socioeconomic status of representing the working class because they have managed to lower unemployment, increase the minimum wage and secure disability rights.

  1. Communism VS Democracy

    Korea is the only remaining "Stalinist" country - which too is about to collapse. The fact is that Communism is very much alive. Communism has not died, but it's main ideas have been absorbed into other political ideologies, just as pre-Christ religious beliefs were gradually adapted into Christianity and other religions (In fact, one finds many Christian ideals in Communism.)

  2. Free essay

    The emerge of Alliance 90

    As the existence of a rather closed class of professional full-time politicians within the disliked established parties was seen as the basic problem in German party democracy, the newly created party organization was structured corresponding to the principle of grassroots5 democracy in order to prevent a future party elite from moving away from the ordinary participants of the new party.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work