• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the notion that the UK is a truly democratic nation

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evaluate the notion that the UK is a truly democratic nation B.Pringle The UK is a democratic nation when the term 'democracy' is used loosely. Citizens of the UK over the age of 18 can vote for whom they would like to represent them in government. However, when the realities of representation, electoral procedures and parliamentary structures are analysed, the extent to which the UK is truly democratic is questioned. In the UK we elect politicians to represent our interests. This in itself could be seen as undemocratic - we are not picking a delegate but someone who will act of his or her own accord. We are giving another person the right to make decisions on our behalf; we are not personally having any say in the decisions of government. One could argue that there should be more referendums on heavily debated issues, such as foxhunting or gay child adoption, in order to ensure the nation is largely on side with the eventual decision passed by parliament. This, however, would be a step towards 'direct representation', which is arguably a slower and less effective form of representation. The UK's form of representation is an efficient way to implement what is essentially democracy. ...read more.

Middle

The reason for this is our representational system of constituencies. It is very geographically divisive and more importantly, regularly ignores a lot of people's votes. A persons vote not counting towards the make up of the democratic assembly of their country is seemingly very undemocratic. Another fault of our supposedly democratic voting system is that we do not elect the Prime Minister which, given the fact that he has probably more power than the average President, this allows people to lay claim to the fact that they hold the leader of their country to account. This fact in itself makes our country, in part, undemocratic. Also the head of our state is the Queen. Is she a democratically elected figure? No. The fact that the monarch has resigned a royal prerogative to the Prime Minister is the reason for their existence in our society. However, the Monarch does still have power over any parliamentary figure or law. What qualifications did the Queen acquire to gain this job? None but birth right. The Queen however, is not the only part of our legislative system that has got there by birthrights. 92 members of The House of Lords sit there because of hereditary peerage. ...read more.

Conclusion

Other European representatives can easily over rule the UK's elected European officials when determining legislation even if it directly affects the UK. Sovereignty has been handed over to the EU and so the UK's domestic government can be over ruled. One could argue this is undemocratic. However, there was a referendum in 1975 over whether or not the UK should remain in the EU and so one would find it difficult to argue that the EU are being undemocratic. The main piece of relatively new legislation which improves a persons democratic rights is the Human rights act. This act ensures peoples freedom from oppression and unfair treatment by guaranteeing every citizen of the UK their individual rights. This, amongst other things, gives an individual the right to hold the state to account in a court of law. The Human rights act secures the fact that the UK is democratic, at least to an extent. In summary, the UK is not particularly democratic after careful analysis, but it is democratic to an extent. The UK could easily be more democratic, but this would come at the price of efficiency. When considered in a global context, the UK is highly democratic; but when scrutinising as to whether the UK is truly democratic in nature, I have found that it is democratic but only moderately. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. "The US Constitution is entrenched and rigid; the UK has no Constitution worthy of ...

    For example, reforms of the House of Lords or devolution are no different from that to pass legislation raising the school leaving age or establishing a national lottery. The ways, and extent, of interpreting the Constitutions vary in the two countries.

  2. Would a world of democratic states prevent war?

    Rummel has also attempted to explain America's covert interference in other countries including Guatemala, Chile, Iran and the Dominican Republic, "Democracies have engaged in covert action. However, this was done secretly by agencies of government, such as the CIA, operating with minimum democratic oversight.

  1. Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction

    He claims that, 2,"induction is a procedure which is logically invalid and rationally unjustifiable". Popper offers a very simple deductive solution to the problem. Professor Popper's theory has been expressed in the following way: . P1 --> TS --> EE --> P2 Where P1 is the initial problem, TS the

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Finally, partisan attachment is based on a rational assessment of which party best represents their own interests and ideology. Proponents of the view that a stable party system is manifesting in Russia point out that four parties from the 1999 elections represent the core of a stabilizing party system (McFaul 2000b, 2000c, 2000d).

  1. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    Its intention was to show how voting behaviour had been dealinged following a major divisive issue. These included, "slavery, federal intervention in the economy or desegregation." (A. King, 2002: 210) The thesis's original thrust has had an unnatural fit over Britain's voting pattern.

  2. Iran Country Study

    Its members are elected for four-year terms, and elections are held on a multi-member constituency basis, with candidates being chosen by the Guardian Council. The Majlis is mainly responsible for ratifying legislation, yet it also can propose bills. In addition to its legislative role, the Majlis serves to critique the behavior of ministerial candidates.

  1. "How democratic is the UK?"

    However, what choice does he have, if he does not vote for Labour, Conservative or the Liberal Democrats, he has essentially wasted his vote. Another negative point about the UK's democratic system is that we allow everyone over the age of eighteen to vote regardless of intelligence or social status.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    groups and organizations, within government itself and within civil society, will profile public budgetary allocations over fairly long periods of time. Goal displacement occurs when the personal interests and expediency of organizational leaders and members come to dominate and replace the purpose(s)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work