• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evaluate the various ways in which participation and democracy can be strengthened in the UK?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Evaluate the effectiveness of the various ways in which participation and democracy could be strengthened in the UK? In recent years there has been concern that the UK is suffering from a participation crisis, turnout over the past 3 general elections has been significantly lower than the average between 1945 and 1997. This means there is a lack of active political engagement within communities, which is a dangerous prospect as if the Uk is to sustain being a representative democracy, then it needs the participation of the people, so that the government can make justifiable decisions within society which are fair and as decisive. Otherwise there is the threat of turning to a more autocratic government. Due to the decline in political participation new ideas are being incorporated into society to get citizens more actively engaged in politics. ...read more.


Another more obvious approach to increasing participation and democracy could be to introduce compulsory voting for all citizens; this could theoretically increase participation levels as the elected representatives would be true representatives of the people and could therefore encourage constitutional changes in which the people want, this would make society more democratically cohesive. This change could also influence democratic legitimacy and could educate people more vastly into politics as they are forcibly made to vote, so they could be obliged to understand what their vote contributes to. An example where compulsory voting is exercised is in Australia here figures show that before 1924 when voting was made mandatory, turnout was at a mere 47%, in the decades since turnout has hovered over 94 to 96%. This is clearly a significant increase in participation but morally is it justified; some would say that forcibly making people vote is undemocratic so is against ...read more.


So it could be a pointless venture and lead to as some would call ?donkey votes? being distributed. An example of a country which adopted the voting at 16 would be Austria. In 2007 Austria became the first country in the EU to adopt this policy and thus so far there are no sufficient figures to suggest that it improves participation consistently, but we can?t rule out that to the minority groups of politically educated that this change would be a beneficial prospect. Overall the suggestions made do show promising opportunities for increasing participation and democracy within the UK, although some suggestions may not be widely accepted because of their implications controversially by certain political parties, it may be difficult to pass such legislation as their needs to be a definite result. The lasting appeals of these suggestions seem to be beneficial to society and do not hinder the public voice but rather make it stronger and more lucrative for the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. What are the main features of representative democracy? In what ways has political participation ...

    It also represents the distinct decline in political participation in the 'less glamorous' side of British Politics, as it has no major impact at national level. The turnout of the public at General Elections is probably the most significant way in which political participation has declined in the UK in recent years.

  2. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    Finally, it can be argued that the current electoral system should be preserved simply because it works and has been proved to work over many years. All other electoral systems are flawed and so there is little point in replacing one flawed system with another.

  1. Democracy and Voting

    * Majoritarian system - the winning candidate needs to get over 50% of the vote e.g. AV, SV * Proportional system - votes equate to seats e.g. List system, STV * Hybrid system - combines aspects of both Majoritarian and proportional e.g.

  2. Political Awareness

    He was a Scholar of his College, and won the University Prize in Jurisprudence. He is an Honorary Fellow of Christ's College and has an honorary LLD from Glasgow University. He lectured in law at the London School of Economics from 1965 to 1969 and was called to the Bar by the Inner Temple in 1967.

  1. Critically assess the extent to which there is a crisis in participation in UK ...

    Critics of the first-past-the-post system argue that because of the fact that one candidate is elected in each constituency creates a disincentive for example, a labour supporter living in a Tory constituency (Qvortrup 2007). It is therefore a wasted vote; this provides partial explanation to voter decline and also reinforces

  2. Apart from referendums, explain three ways in which democracy in the UK could be ...

    Under first-past-the-post, the UK or local authority is divided into numerous voting areas, i.e. constituencies or wards. At a general or local election, voters put a cross (X) next to their preferred candidate on a ballot paper. Ballot papers are then counted and the candidate that has received the most votes is elected to represent the constituency or ward.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work