• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Even in the 21st Century There are Grounds for Arguing that Governments are Dominated by Small Elites

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Even in the 21st Century There are Grounds for Arguing that Governments are Dominated by Small, Exclusive Elites." Discuss. An elite is a small group of people that posses disproportionally large amounts of scarce sources of influence over political decision-making: money, social prestige or political power. Pluralism suggests that political power is more dispersed, sometimes amongst various interest groups. A power elite is where a small group of people who hold most of the power and control most of the wealth of a state. A state elite is where the state is more despotic and the state's power to limit the government is less than it should be. Marxism is the study of society as the conflict or struggle of social classes. There are many families that are heavily immersed in politics. George Bush senior and Junior, Hillary and Bill Clinton, Ed and David Miliband, Ted Kennedy and JFK, John Prescott and his son (who recently failed to make the selection to be a Labour candidate) and William Rees-Mogg, current peer and previous editor of the times and his two children who are both Conservative candidates for the next election. ...read more.

Middle

In the House of Commons, the governing party almost always has a majority (sometimes it has to gain this by forming a coalition.) By using this majority and by using the Parliament Acts and the Salisbury Convention the governing party can force through pretty much any legislation it wants. The number of people in the Houses of Lords and Commons who do not belong to the governing party in the House of Commons will outnumber the total number of MPs in the governing party in the House of Commons. Here a minority of MPs can force any legislation through, in theory. This is not helped by the pay-roll vote, made up of the 100+ ministers who will always vote with the government. Since 1945 in the UK there has not been a single elected government which had a majority of the vote. In 2005 Labour had the lowest return vote in political history for an incumbent government. In 2001, the 'Non-Voting Party' gained 15% of the vote more than Labour. Hailsham would call this 'elective dictatorship'. Insider Pressure groups have a great deal of influence in government. ...read more.

Conclusion

In 1998, 66.5% of civil service members had arts degrees; 43.5% were from Oxbridge and 50% from public schools. However, within the civil service significant improvements have been made. A report from the late 1960's claimed that 85% of the mandarins (a class of civil servant) were from a middle-class background, 71% had arts degrees, mainly in history and classics; and 73% were from Oxbridge. Overall, it seems that certain groups in society are over-represented in government, whether it be in local/state government through to national government. However, over the past fifty years this has massively improved. This are still improving and it will take time. Berlusconi's response to the Spanish cabinet that views that may be considered undesirable are still around and it will take time for those to disappear. The Spanish cabinet however also proved that these kinds of views are becoming less and less prevalent. In both Parliament and Congress there are record numbers of women and people from ethnic minorities. Is making Congress and Parliament more representative actually making things better? In the House of Lords the remaining hereditary peers turn out more regularly to votes and debates than many of the new peers replacing hereditary peers in order to make the House of Lords more representative. ?? ?? ?? ?? Callum Davis April 21, 2008 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Similarities and differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism

    to exert in politics and the adverse violent happenings that they brought in the 21st century doubtlessly brought echoes of the 20th century European Fascism which brought about not only the 2nd World War but also the holocaust. However, to brand 21st century religious fundamentalism as the 'new fascism' is not only incorrect but also unjustified.

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    there are no specific charities that can claim that I have a distinct and assignable obligation to give them money. One has a distinct and assignable obligation only if someone else has a right that you must fulfill (even a negative right).

  1. Compare and Contrast pluralist and ruling elites accounts of political power

    To summarise " inter group competition... [means] .....The power of one group tends to cancel that of another so that a rough equilibrium results" (http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/APGOV_pluralism.htm)wwhich backs up their original point that no single group can dominate. There are several major differences between the 2 approaches. To begin with, pluralists insist that "large size does not prevent

  2. "Ideology played relatively small role in the revolutions of 1848" Discuss.

    At the beginning of the revolutions 1848, the ideology was extremely important. All social classes were in misery, because the outcome of economic changes. Everybody, from peasants to bourgeoisie, believed that liberal reforms will bring changes for better. Without the ideology, the hope for a different life, the revolutions would

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    and acquire name recognition in time to enter the contest for the real prize: the presidency. It also provides the financial resources to accomplish this, for those parties that qualified to run. This situation also contributes to the fragmentation of the party system which, in turn, makes it difficult for partisan leaders to win the presidency.

  2. Outline the teachings of Marx and state whether you think Marxism has any relevance ...

    This would mean that the peasants are the oppressed class of "Have-Nots". This means they do not have anything which is a luxury etc. The ruling class is then the monarch and the nobles. Middle class or bourgeoisie, are the new class, revolutionary ex-lower class descendants.

  1. Could one censor pornography, on Millean grounds?

    his Liberty principle where "the sole end of which mankind are warranted in interfering with the liberty of action is self protection...the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.

  2. T difficult for export orientated economics to sustain the land owning elites much longer. ...

    (Potter, 2000, pp 145 - 166). Both Brazil and Argentina experienced some economic and political stability at the beginning of the twentieth century, this had evolved out of the export orientated economics that both countries used at this time, what is export orientated economics?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work