Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2

Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends - Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends Discuss The word socialist devolves from the Latin idea to share or combine, though many people argue that socialism had its routes as far back as Plato. Realistically true socialism only came to light in the 19th century. It came as a reaction to the growth of liberal capitalism and the ideas, which lay in its base. Socialists saw liberal capitalism fundamentally as being exploitive and saw the poverty and ill treatment it was handing out to the working classes. The lassez faire economic management that the government was using was giving capital owners an easy ride, giving them total control on wealth for its workers with the total control of wages and the total lack of any reasonable working conditions. Socialism was born and aim was to end this exploitary system of liberal capitalism. Like any ideology socialism has at its foundations a view of the world at present, a view of how they would think a perfect world would be and a way to get there, and within those a view on what Human nature is like.

Middle

After several years this would with the state wither away as good nature would take over the committee of things would soon be the committee of persons though Marx and Engels saw the revolution as being an internationalist affair. Which would have to involve the whole world if it was going to be successful. Other revolutionaries had different ideas, for example both Lenin and later Stalin took Marx and Engels ideas and then tried applying them to Russia adopting them to work on people instead of paper. Ultimately communism in Russia collapsed and left a scarred country. Although it could be argued that the reason it failed was not because of the ideas it was because it forgot about the reasons behind it and Stalin became too powerful and corrupt and used communism to be a dictator. This differs hugely from evolutionary socialism, evolutionary socialism as an ideology developed much later than revolutionary socialism. It had seen and waved goodbye to the dark satanic mills and said hello to what a critic would say were capitalists defences against revolution, it saw in 1918 the franchisment for all males over 21 and some women.

Conclusion

Though in the next hundred years afterwards changes started to occur although some argue they were the defences of capitalism, that are tricking people to believe they are in control, the changes made seemed to bring capitalism in to a more positive light. Evolutionary socialists started to emerge who saw capitalism as workable, and reformable. They saw the introduction of things like health and safety laws, a ban on child labour and a reduction in the number of working hours a person was allowed to work as positive an steps in the right direction. To the extent by the late 1970's many of the remaining revolutionary parties in countries such as Italy and France conceded that revolution was no longer an object but instead to influence through the democratic process. Too all extent now there are very few true communist states now and all are run by dictators. It seem that revolutionary socialism has had its day and a less radical evolutionary type of socialism is now here to stay. In conclusion it has seemed that revolutionary and evolutionary socialism have varied greatly from one another in both means and ends, but they were mainly separated in time and society. It almost seemed that a slow change can be seen with development of capitalism form revolution to evolution.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    This is because a number of highly ranked French officers gave evidence against Dreyfus at the trial. It was on the basis of this, as well as documents which were falsified by the army, that Dreyfus was convicted. Therefore to acquit Dreyfus, would essentially undermine the officers involved in the trial which in effect undermined the army.

  2. Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction

    It is the move from observed phenomena to the unobserved instances via predictions, which makes inductive reasoning invalid for Popper.

  1. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    Therefore political reform is pointless, and universal suffrage is a façade, covering up the reality of unequal class. A class-conscious working class must overthrow the 'bourgeois state' through revolution. After this there will be a state for a short time, under the 'dictatorship of the proletariat' until the danger of

  2. Why does Marx believe that capitalism will inevitably give way to socialism?

    This began to take place as the industrial revolution began to garner steam. Coercion and inducement forced peasants to move from their land into the newly developed towns and cities. The economic character of capitalism is an added source to the class struggles, which Marx sees as part and parcel of capitalism.

  1. Democracy and Capitalism in the Developing World: Compatible or Conflictive.

    An issue of dire interest to the discussion on the relationship between democracy and capitalism, however, is that of "all democracies being capitalist". The Freedom House Report for 2003 shows that within Western Europe and the Anglophone states are all democracies; in Latin America and the Caribbean of the 33

  2. Critically Evaluate the Impact of Socialist Organisations and Ideas on the Early Labour Party.

    votes away from Liberals and consequently handing victory over to the Tories. Their dedication to permeation also meant they were at odds with the Trade Union movement. The Fabians, have over time, seen the analysis of their part in the creation of the Labour Party decline.

  1. Third parties

    To qualify for public funding, a third party must have received at least 5 percent of the popular vote in the last election. For example, the Federal Election Commission, which administers the financing laws, ruled in 1980 that John Anderson could receive a share of federal funds only if he achieved 5 percent of the vote.

  2. Compare and contrast Marx and Engels with Mill regarding social and economic progress

    He therefore believes that it is the ideas and thoughts of a society that shapes its progress and once these ideas reach 'perfectibility' a world of freedom and happiness will be created. (WRITE ABOUT UTILITARIANISM HERE) It is important to note, as J.B.

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.