• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends - Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends Discuss The word socialist devolves from the Latin idea to share or combine, though many people argue that socialism had its routes as far back as Plato. Realistically true socialism only came to light in the 19th century. It came as a reaction to the growth of liberal capitalism and the ideas, which lay in its base. Socialists saw liberal capitalism fundamentally as being exploitive and saw the poverty and ill treatment it was handing out to the working classes. The lassez faire economic management that the government was using was giving capital owners an easy ride, giving them total control on wealth for its workers with the total control of wages and the total lack of any reasonable working conditions. Socialism was born and aim was to end this exploitary system of liberal capitalism. Like any ideology socialism has at its foundations a view of the world at present, a view of how they would think a perfect world would be and a way to get there, and within those a view on what Human nature is like. ...read more.

Middle

After several years this would with the state wither away as good nature would take over the committee of things would soon be the committee of persons though Marx and Engels saw the revolution as being an internationalist affair. Which would have to involve the whole world if it was going to be successful. Other revolutionaries had different ideas, for example both Lenin and later Stalin took Marx and Engels ideas and then tried applying them to Russia adopting them to work on people instead of paper. Ultimately communism in Russia collapsed and left a scarred country. Although it could be argued that the reason it failed was not because of the ideas it was because it forgot about the reasons behind it and Stalin became too powerful and corrupt and used communism to be a dictator. This differs hugely from evolutionary socialism, evolutionary socialism as an ideology developed much later than revolutionary socialism. It had seen and waved goodbye to the dark satanic mills and said hello to what a critic would say were capitalists defences against revolution, it saw in 1918 the franchisment for all males over 21 and some women. ...read more.

Conclusion

Though in the next hundred years afterwards changes started to occur although some argue they were the defences of capitalism, that are tricking people to believe they are in control, the changes made seemed to bring capitalism in to a more positive light. Evolutionary socialists started to emerge who saw capitalism as workable, and reformable. They saw the introduction of things like health and safety laws, a ban on child labour and a reduction in the number of working hours a person was allowed to work as positive an steps in the right direction. To the extent by the late 1970's many of the remaining revolutionary parties in countries such as Italy and France conceded that revolution was no longer an object but instead to influence through the democratic process. Too all extent now there are very few true communist states now and all are run by dictators. It seem that revolutionary socialism has had its day and a less radical evolutionary type of socialism is now here to stay. In conclusion it has seemed that revolutionary and evolutionary socialism have varied greatly from one another in both means and ends, but they were mainly separated in time and society. It almost seemed that a slow change can be seen with development of capitalism form revolution to evolution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    The Affair first came into the public arena when it was leaked to the anti-Semitic newspaper 'La Libre Parole'. From the very beginning of the affair there was lively press controversy, 80% of which was hostile towards Dreyfus.15Anti-Semitic feelings were exploited, especially in 'La Croix', a Catholic newspaper, which was

  2. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    Therefore political reform is pointless, and universal suffrage is a façade, covering up the reality of unequal class. A class-conscious working class must overthrow the 'bourgeois state' through revolution. After this there will be a state for a short time, under the 'dictatorship of the proletariat' until the danger of

  1. Why did Marx and Engels believe that history was on their side?

    Marx made this point clear from his earliest writings. But it was only with the workers' revolution in Paris in 1871, the revolution that established the short-lived Paris Commune, that Marx came to see some of the forms that a workers' state, workers' democracy, would take. The Paris Commune, Marx wrote was 'essentially a working class government ...

  2. To what extent was Fascist Italy the bastard child of Liberal Italy?

    Fascism was much more attractive to the Church as not only did it promise to destroy socialism, whom the Church feared for their anti-religious views, but also held similar attitudes such as the need for order, discipline and respect for hierarchy.

  1. How revolutionary were Lutheran and Calvinist theories of authority?

    given role.'5 The aim of authority was to prevent chaos because of the ungodly and unchristian in the world. The sword was a symbol, emblem and substance of secular society and Luther explains that it has existed since the beginning of the world and is therefore legitimate.

  2. Extent of key political ideas in directly influencing change and development .

    They genuinely wanted to help the poor, but they wanted to further their own careers as well. To quote Derek Fraser, " it had always been Lloyd George's intention to make a great stir, to do something really big that would attract public attention."

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    German comrades, with important elements to establish the grounds and possibilities of a unification of workers' struggles at the European level. http://www.unh.edu/inquiryjournal/06/articles/bertolotto.html Not a single government, whether monarchy or bourgeois republic, has yet ventured to undertake a serious inquiry into the position of the French working class.

  2. Compare and contrast Marx and Engels with Mill regarding social and economic progress

    John Stuart Mill falls under the former definition and in doing so is, like Hegel, an idealist. As an Idealist Mill uses the thought process (e.g. rational thought) to understand how the material world adheres to certain ideas. These ideas are constantly changing and progressing and are remoulding the changes and progressions being made in the material world.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work