• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the clash between ideas of "Liberty" and "Democracy" shown in the current debate about the banning of fox-hunting

Extracts from this document...


Examine the clash between ideas of "Liberty" and "Democracy" shown in the current debate about the banning of fox-hunting Fox-hunting has been a major issue on the political agenda for the past ten years because both sides have strong emotions about either a foxes rights or human rights however the debate about fox hunting also raises questions about liberty and democracy and whether or not our political system is fair. During the debate in Parliament Mr Michael urged "the Lords to behave democratically" and this shows how the Status of the House of Lords and whether or not it is a democratic institution are being brought into the spotlight once more. The House of Commons is allowed to push a bill through the House of Lords even if it has been rejected using the Parliament Act and it looks as though this is going to happen but is this democratic? Some believe that the House of Lords play an important role in checking the Government and therefore the Parliament Act should not be used over an issue which most do not view as important as other issues such as pensions. ...read more.


It can even be argued that referenda are not fairer: just because the majority wants something does not mean it is necessarily the right option. If everything were to be done through referendums than minority voices, such as that of the disabled, would never be heard. In this case it could even be argued that fox-hunters (who are usually associated with the countryside) are a minority who are having their wishes ignored because people who do not even know anything about fox-hunting have decided that they are against it. In this country our Government tends to make decisions which look after minorities therefore implying that in our democracy the will of the majority of the people should be the line that is taken unless it puts other group's at harm. Fox-hunting is difficult because those who hunt claim that if the sport were to be banned then livelihoods and a way of life would be destroyed, they claim that they have a right to hunt and by banning the sport this right is being removed. The continuation of fox-hunting could be viewed as democratic because those who do the sport claim that if it is banned their quality of life will be reduced and therefore in this case the will of the majority should be ignored. ...read more.


as being removed simply because the Prime Minister wants to regain some of his popularity. However some believe that it is unfair to allow Hunters to have this right most believe this because they see hunting as the killing of a defenceless animal despite the counter arguments such as fox are vermin. Other moral questions are raised such as whether or not a fox has rights and how much pain they are in. Those who favour the ban argue that there should not be a freedom to fox-hunt and that it should be made illegal. This raises the issue of whether or not society is improved as a whole because of increased restriction and removal of liberties. Obviously restriction is important because it makes society safer (crime restrictions) and more prosperous (tax), however fox-hunting is complex to judge because its existence does not harm people or put people at risk it just offends them. Is offence a good enough reason to take away a liberty that has existed for centuries especially when most of those who want to impose a ban have not experienced fox-hunting first hand? ?? ?? ?? ?? Jenn Beales 13SW ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and Contrast Positive and Negative Conceptions of Liberty.

    positive liberty into a justification for oppression - which is itself a fundamental opposite to liberty.

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinion of others, to do so would be wise or even right. These are good reasons for remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him

  1. Indonesia: Transition and Prospects for Democracy

    There had been increasing rivalry between Golkar and opposition groups. In the mid-1980s, political participation was allowed to increase through a process of "politik keterbukaan" (political openness) due to the increase in public political awareness after economic growth and improvement in education levels.

  2. Can a plausible case be made for participatory democracy under modern conditions?

    For the greater the number of citizens there are, the smaller the share of the power. In the proposed assemblies in which citizens under the 'classical' theory are to discuss and voice opinions on political issues, each person's share of the time available will become infinitesimally short in duration if

  1. British Democracy - the bestpossible system of government

    If he has no children the education system may have no impact over his life and therefore, he doesn't wish to pay thousands of pounds in tax to improve it. However, what choice does he have, if he does not vote for Labour, Conservative or the Liberal Democrats, he has essentially wasted his vote.

  2. Extent of key political ideas in directly influencing change and development .

    at times of crisis, further promoting the cause of both Nationalism and unification. The growth of nationalistic sentiment in Italy and Germany can be attributed to its use and adoption by Napoleon III. Napoleon had shown that democracy was not as dangerous as people perceived it to be; his use

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    Now we come to the time of Cylon (636 B.C.) and Draco (last quarter of 6th century B.C.) and the third stage. Cylon was significant in that the Olympic champion had tried to install himself as tyrant of Athens by armed force (the way that tyrants achieved power)

  2. Is consociational democracy democratic?

    In this sense, by embracing the notion of grand coalition, consociationalism can be said to be 'democratic'15. There is, however, evidence to suggest that in practice the principle of 'grand coalition' does not adhere closely to the benchmarks of democracy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work