Examine the first five chapters of 1984 - Discuss how Orwell explores and introduces the theme of control.

Authors Avatar

By Nathan Chang

Examine the first five chapters of 1984

Discuss how Orwell explores and introduces the theme of control

In the first five chapters of the novel we see different methods of control the parties uses to create the perfect totalitarian society. This as in ‘1984’ a book that was actually based on real life London 1948. At this point in history Orwell gathered peoples fear of Nazi Germany, Russia, China and all their controversial communistic views. Orwell used the setting of war torn London and a Stalinism rule. Stalin used the condition of the people together with making himself a Godlike figure to keep the Russian’s both inspired, focussed and under control especially through propaganda.


The barrage of constant Party propaganda just as Stalin did is gradually getting rid of the ability to reason and independent thought, in effect causes you to rely more on The Party and Big Brother. This to the extent that citizens believe anything that the Party tells them, even while possessing information that runs counter to what they are being told, this is doublethink. An example of this is when Winston knew that, ‘Oceania was at war with Eurasia and allied with Eastasia,’ this is whereas now he remembers that ‘it was only four years since Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and allied with Eurasia.’ I believe he remembers as he is strong-minded and his mind isn’t easily controlled. This is quite similar to The Party slogans and the names of their governmental buildings are easily excepted because of doublethink. This is very useful method of control as they can change anything they say at anytime, then erase records of what they say and it’s as though they never said it. This makes the party seem perfect, as it will never make them seem like they’ve made a mistake.

A method in which control and doublethink is channelled and enforced is inside every room and corridor are telescreens which are two way, sending and receiving. The giant telescreen in every citizen's room always is giving the citizens propaganda designed to make the Party appear to be a triumphant success. This beside in with their altering the past to make The Party seem perfect, better than it was before to which no one can question because there is no past to recollect from. The telescreens also monitor behaviour everywhere they go citizens are continuously reminded, by means of the ever-present signs reading "Big Brother is watching you," that the authorities are watching and checking on them. By them continually doing this, ‘asleep or awake, working or eating, indoors or out of doors, in the bath or in the bed-no escape. Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull.’ This quote actually shows the extent of the telescreens nothing could be hidden, privacy did not exist and everything you knew Big Brother and The Party knew.   The party uses these telescreens to keep a watchful eye on the public, which keeps them from committing any thought crime or crime against the party for fear of vaporisation. This supported by when Winston says, ‘people simply disappeared, always during the night. Your name was removed from the register every record of everything you had ever done was wiped out; your one time existence was denied and then forgotten. You were abolished, annihilated: vaporised was the usual word.’ We can see that this really got to Winston as the whole quote is repetitive on the point of destruction.

Join now!

Anybody outside is either an unperson or a ‘animal’ as the proles are called. The party uses this to keep themselves in power as well as to keep control and order. As the party classing the Proles as ‘animals’ it keeps their loyal party members from having too much contact with them. In affect it keeps them from seeing the life of the Prole not under complete control of Big Brother and The Party. Although if we consider Winston’s betrayal through the shopkeeper we can see that the Proles maybe used as lure for thought criminals. As the Outer ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

Avatar

I would suggest that the quality of written communication could be improved. Most notably, I would revise certain phrases as their meaning is often ambiguous to say the least. 'Based on real life London'? Orwell's novel, although characterised by a harsh environment, is hyperbolic in nature as it emphasises the mass sufferering that a totalitarian state could bring. Equally, 'the perfect totalitarian society'? This appears oxymoronic considering the novel is a scathing critique of totalitarianism and Stalinist Russia. In essence, be careful with phrasing. However, one cannot dispute that grammar, spelling and punctuation are all fine.

The level of analysis is adequate here, as this candidate often references specifics within the novel and uses them to support a given point. Undoubtedly they have a good understanding of the methods that the party uses in order to gain control of the majority. Furthermore, they have selected a variety of points which is always recommended in order to avoid a linear essay. However, I was often left questioning how the said method gains control, and I was hoping for greater depth and detail. For example, this candidate discusses the, oligarchic, social order by referencing the 'proles' yet does not conclude by explaining its effect. Yet, this essay does contain a fair level of analysis with a good, rounded, understanding of the subject in question.

There is no doubt that this candidate answers the question with both focus and direction. They do not detract from their answer, which is common with such a broad subject. The question itself is answered with distinct sections, all of which provide concise and relevent ideas. For example this candidate discusses propaganda, surveillance, the environment, control of records and language amongst others. Yet, I would suggest expanding these points by combining them into broader themes as I have done above. For example this candidate discusses 'telescreens' and body language seperately, why not simply discuss surveillance? On the whole, this candidate's response is both relevent and direct.