• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Examine the reasons for change in the balance of power between the federal and the state governments since 1980'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Vanessa Bowen 13FA Mrs Sharman 'Examine the reasons for change in the balance of power between the federal and the state governments since 1980' When evaluating the causes of reform in the balance of power since 1980 among the federal and state governments, one needs to concentrate on several key factors: the reasons why states increased their power, the reasons for growth in federal authority and an explanation for the change which took place. Each federal system is unique in the sense that the relationship between federal [national] government and state [regional] government is determined not just by constitutional rules, but also by a complex of political, historical, geographical, cultural and social circumstances. Both central government [the federal level] and regional government [the state level] possess a range of powers that the other cannot encroach upon. These include at least a measure of legislative and executive authority and the capacity to raise revenue and thus enjoy a degree of fiscal independence. However, the specific fields of jurisdiction of each level of government and the capacity of each to influence the other vary considerably. The basic principle of federalism is fixed in the Tenth Amendment [ratified in 1791] to the Constitution which states: 'The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people'. ...read more.

Middle

As State governments were forced to rely on their own sources of income, so they rediscovered their autonomy. State policies became more creative. Innovations extended to important social issues such as welfare reform and education. Some referred to the 'renaissance of the states' as they again became 'laboratories of democracy'. This caused much irritation. Critics felt the state's action had compromised both America's internal market and Washington's control of foreign policy, two traditional functions of the national government. There were limitations to Reagan's programme. The swaps and devolution of programmes to the states were abandoned. The programme was met with hostility from Congress and overall 'The impression was created that federalism was nothing more than a code word for stringent expenditure cuts'. Overall, Reagan was unable to win sufficient support. In the 1990s, the Federal government continued to exercise more power over more aspects, 'Coercive federalism'. The Supreme Court made a number of significant rulings. Although the Garcia versus San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority ruling [1985] enhanced the powers of the federal government, recent court rulings, for example the availability of abortion, have reinforced the position of the individual states. In November 1994, the Republicans won control of both houses of Congress in the mid-term elections with a commitment to reshape federal relationships and devolve power back to the states. ...read more.

Conclusion

The federal government often only sets minimum standards, for example environmental protection. The federal system retains some dualism, as originally envisaged in the USA. It meant that the national and state governments in a federation retained separate spheres of action. Each level independently performs the tasks allocated to it by the constitution, for example, the banking system and that of the tax system. In reality, the main feature of contemporary federations is interdependence rather than independence of levels. Overall, Kincaid argues that both federal and state government have become strong and modern governments. It seems that overall, the developments which have occurred may provide a basis for the beginnings of what Thomas R. Dye calls 'competitive federalism', in which federal, state and local governments would compete with each other to provide the services that citizens demand. Federalism is still a potent force in America and it continues to draw its vigour from the desire at a political level to decentralise political power. President George W Bush has promised to continue with what might be deemed a republican principle-making Federal government smaller. Though some political scientists argue that in the future it is possible that power will begin to return to Washington DC. For example, the events of the 11th of September have almost certainly enhanced the powers of the President and the executive branch of the government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline how and why federalism has changed since the 1960s.

    5 star(s)

    office he reduced it by $18 billion), and to input the swap system in which states had to fund two poverty reducing measures whilst the federal government would supply the medicare. Reducing federal aid created a sever problem for certain states; New York was effectively made bankrupt by the reductions

  2. How and Why has federalism changes sice the 1960s

    His system of swaps also had many flaws; the states found the idea very attractive but it was clear that they would not be able to carry out these programmes without severely increasing taxes or cutting benefits, and thus the scheme was rejected.

  1. Federalism vs. Devolution

    There are several negative consequences with federalism, beginning with the massive variation there can be in state laws, over key issues such as crime and punishment, drinking ages and marriage laws. Secondly, it creates a complex legal system, with both national and state courts each with their own agenda.

  2. Identify and explain all the factors which encouraged and discouraged change during 1863-77

    The Black Codes exposed the weaknesses of the federal government and the power of the state government. As long as each state government had the power to implement voting qualifications, such as being able to read and write and own property, the African Americans were never going to be able to vote as they lacked any education.

  1. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    It is unlikely a government would seek to volunteer knowledge which is likely to disclose it as being inappropriate to govern (Flinders, 2000, 429). I believe a strong government would never undertake to undermine its own position by administering legislation that Clark first penned.

  2. Richard Daley and other Mayors of Chicago.

    control over the public education system within Chicago to the Mayor's office. RMD got full control in 1995, he appointed Paul Vallas to take the CEO position at the head of the school board. Some people weren't so enthused at this change of power to the mayor, which gave him

  1. presidential power how far does it go

    Under this act, a separate court order was required for each communications carrier( aba). The government argued that with the proliferation of carriers, (eg email, cell phones, blackberries, messaging etc) a single warrant was needed that allowed the government to tap the person, not the phone.

  2. Is the USA still a federal state?

    Additionally after the 2008 recession the state intervened in terms of economic management; consider the $700 billion ?bail-out? package, thus financially the federal government took a direct role in the workings of the financial system. It is surprising to witness a Republican president to pass measures that characterizing a government

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work