• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Explain And Discuss How The "Ideologies Of Welfare" Explored In This Module Can Be Used To Understand The Political Legitimation And Debate Within The UK Social Policy From 1979 To The Present Day".

Extracts from this document...


"Explain And Discuss How The "Ideologies Of Welfare" Explored In This Module Can Be Used To Understand The Political Legitimation And Debate Within The UK Social Policy From 1979 To The Present Day". "The Economic Shift In UK Social Policy Since The Era Of Thatcherism" In this essay I aim to explain and discuss the ways in which 'ideologies of welfare' can be used to understand political legitimation and debate within UK social policy from 1979 to present day. I shall approach this question by initially offering an explanation of the concept of political legitimation and ideologies. Having expressed these definitions I shall move on to explain and discuss social policy surrounding the Conservatives party's moves to 'role back the welfare state' during Mrs. Thatcher's reign of the 1980's. In order to express an ideology of welfare thoroughly, my writings shall scope the economic structure of the British welfare state and the social policies surrounding it. I shall draw upon political and welfare ideologies that support and counter policies surrounding economic distribution during the 1980's. My writings shall also include reference to the changing political leaderships of the Conservative party from Margaret Thatcher to John Major in 1990 and the new labour government and leadership of Tony Blair in 1997, and their subsequent policies upon British economics in an attempt to offer a critique. ...read more.


Social policies that followed embodied the notion of rolling back state intervention, especially with regard to social security, the National Health Service and council housing. These policies were both explicit and implicit in their emergence and in the origins from the Conservative parties manifestos (Walsh, 2000, Pp52 - 53). The Conservative government continued throughout the 1980's under the leadership of Mrs. Thatcher. In 1990 a change in the Conservatives political leadership changed hands to John Major. Although there was a change in leadership, the strategy of Thatcherite policies ensued, with their profound results remaining (Walsh, 2000, P 53). Ideologically, Mrs. Thatcher never saw herself as being anything but a true Conservative. Some have said Thatcherism can be seen as 'a distinctive reading of Conservative Party history' therefore Thatcherism is not a new ideology simply the accurate interpretation of Conservatism (Aughey, 1983, vol.36 No. 4). Although it is greatly argued to the contrary, with the policies of Mrs. Thatcher's conservative party, although embodying certain conservative thought, ideological emphasis was greatly placed upon Laissez-Faire, capitalism with a hint of new liberalism. Conservatism as an ideology want little change, dominant traditional values are poignant, centering on age-old institutions such as the family and church. ...read more.


New Labours aims of social policy are to 'promote personal autonomy and choice, giving way to allow for individuals to gain the confidence and capability to manage their own lives' (Commission on Social Justice, 1994, P113) these steps are to change the once safety net of welfare into a trampoline (Walsh, 2000, Pp 56 - 57). Ideologically, these steps to reform social policies of 'Old Labour' to 'New Labour' are a far step from the former socialism and new liberal backgrounds. These policies show similarities to Conservatism, Laissez-Faire, with a few Socialist values and new liberal ideologies in place to promote former origins and values. Wrapping up, political legitimation supported by ideologies of welfare in an essay of this size cannot be completely explored. I began this essay by offering definitions of political legitimation and ideologies. Moving on to account the social policies of Mrs. Thatchers Conservative regime from 1979 onwards, outline the eonomic shift from keynesian to montearist economics, and there effects upon UK welfare systems. The essay then proggressed to outline the ideologies of welfare which could be used to offer political legitimantions and an attempt to offer a critique using New Labour polices and there legitmations. Therefore, this essay has attempted to explain and discuss how the ideologies of welfare" explored in this module can be used to understand the political legitimation and debate within the uk social policy from 1979 to the present day. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3 Stars - This essay is thorough and well structured, and attempts to construct a logical and coherent analysis of the ideologies and their contribution to political legitimacy.
The essay successfully defines different political ideologies without adequately relating it to actual policy and its effects. There is also little linkage and meaningful comparison of the different elements of the question.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 15/10/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare and contrast the UK and US political parties and their party systems

    reversals if a party loses a election as the newly elected government seeks to impose its 'mark' on the country that has just elected it to power. Such sweeping reversals, it is claimed, cannot benefit the state in the short and long term.

  2. Analyse the main differences between Liberal and Marxist ideology

    get different treatment when being dealt with by the justice system under any circumstances. This leads to equality of opportunity, whereby individuals should be given corresponding prospects to succeed or fail in life, in turn leading to the belief in a meritocracy.

  1. An essay on David Ricardo's Major Contribution to Economics

    into parliament but not only that, it has also been argued that he acted as a 'school-master' helping Ricardo who hadn't received a lot of formal education to write his treatise in 1817. The second main supporter was John McCulloch (1789-1864), a Scottish journalist who as Fetter said in 1965 was a 'tireless salesman for Ricardian Economics'.

  2. Why did Marx Criticise Liberal Democracy?

    Marx criticised liberal democracy on the grounds that it alienated the people and is deficient because it is a part of capitalism. The 'freedoms' and policies implemented by the democratic governments were based on vacillating and uniformed public opinion. Marx disagreed with the concept that each person in society individualistic

  1. Assess the advantages of direct and representative democracy

    People in government are most often career politicians and have the expertise to govern better than the mass of people and in the interests of the nation/state. Quite obviously, having people that are educated in economics and politics for example, is an advantage as you would think they'd be best placed to act in the public's interest.

  2. Compare the views about the nature and development of Carl Rogers and George Kelly. ...

    Rogers' theory stresses that it is the individual's own comprehension of his or her experiences that is important, rather then the therapist's professional interpretation (Rogers, 1951). Kelly founded what is known as the personal construct system. He suggested that our personal constructs reflect our constant efforts to make sense of

  1. Compare and contrast the pluralist, elitist and Marxist theories of the state.

    Governments subject themselves to re-election, and are therefore subject to being voted out of office. This should further ensure that the majority of the society's interests are fulfilled. The House of Lords and House of Commons in this country supply checks and balances to the power of government.

  2. Why and to what extent, have conservatives supported One Nation principles?

    Disraeli was a supporter of noblesse oblige, that is, the 'price paid' in return for operating authority as a government as the political obligations of the state to maintain a stable society and economy. The principled basis for One Nationism is that the 'rich' have a moral obligation to help

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work