• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the arguments for and against introducing a codified constitution

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the arguments for and against introducing a codified constitution. Discuss. Ursula Oliver 12RJ At present, the UK's constitution is uncodified or de facto; there is no single document though the majority of Britain's constitution lies in written form of acts, court judgments and treaties. The foundation of British constitution is the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty where acts passed by Parliament are the UK's supreme and final source of law. Therefore, simply by passing an Act, Parliament has power to change the constitution. This has caused debate over whether this uncodified constitution is seen as flexible or a liability to the UK. Some people wish to recover the constitution by introducing a codified constitution which is entrenched, whereas others such as Conservative leader David Cameron believe a British Bill of Rights alongside or instead of the Human Rights Act is best whilst maintaining an uncodified constitution. Arguments for introducing a codified constitution usually suggest that the introduction would help to correct imbalances in the current political system. This refers mainly to the second chamber and considering the constitutional status the House of Lords holds, whilst also allowing a discussion over the relation between the executive and legislature. ...read more.

Middle

With an entrenched constitution, like in the US, our rights would be more accessible. At present, where it is unwritten, it isn't known so people are reliant on the government to remain playing by unwritten rules. If we were to become more aware of our rights, we would be more likely to claim them, too. Some feel it would be safer and more democratic for a definitive on constitutional arrangements and procedures and law to be limited. Therefore, it seems there is a demand for our constitution to become codified in order to protect our rights and strengthen the constitution in case of constitutional crisis. However, it is argued that these demands for a codified constitution come from academics rather than the people, without real need. Britain has not undergone a constitutional crisis of any sort like Germany and Japan after the Second World War, and the only time there would be a need for a written document would be if Scotland became independent. At present, the people seem broadly satisfied that the nature of government is legitimate and creating a codified constitution could easily widen divisions instead of healing them. ...read more.

Conclusion

Taking everything into consideration, I refer back to the proposal of introducing a British Bill of Rights. This can create a common bond, a unifying force, unlike a codified constitution which would only create greater divisions. Building on the Human Rights Act, a Bill of Rights gives further effect to principles like the Magna Carta which is still relevant to modern situations where social mobility and diversity is increasing. Those concerned with the lack of knowledge over rights would be at rest as a Bill of Rights also ensures individuals are given a clearer idea of what to expect from public authorities and each other. This increases citizenship and gives room for educational improvement as well covering economic and social rights which are not recognised under the Human Rights Act. Linking peoples rights and responsibilities and highlighting the differences, a Bill of Rights ensures a flexible and adaptable constitution remains and can often be seen as "Human Rights Act plus". Therefore it does not create unnecessary debate over a codified constitution and its funding issues nor does it conceal people's rights. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Overall this essay shows evidence of knowledge and understanding. There are some good ideas put forward in this essay but the limited evaluation of the points made hinders the development of a good argument. It would be better to have argument followed by counter argument, rather than listing all the arguments for and then all the arguments against.

***

Marked by teacher Jessica Jung 07/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Impact of government policies

    3 star(s)

    fire station which would assist to meet the target set for response times in that area. This shows how government and local targets have a real impact on the operation of the services. Social responses to UK government policies on the public services Although many features of government policy are

  2. Is Britain an elective dictatorship?

    From the declining effectiveness of parliament, we can see that an elective dictatorship in Britain is present, but whether Britain is a fully elective dictatorship is an issue we have to discuss. Under Tony Blair's government Britain has been increasingly seen as an elective dictatorship as many people feel its

  1. Should the UK have a codified constitution?

    This would protect British citizens from dictatorship, which many could argue, is in place now. Parliamentary sovereignty defines the politics of the UK; any laws passed are in effect, changes to the constitution. Until the creation of the coalition in May 2010, most governments were the majority party in parliament,

  2. Some differences and similarities between the Australian and United States federal legislatures

    and 1901 (Australia). 2. Elections Australia United States Elections are held every three years or sooner if an election is called by the Prime Minister. Elections for the Congress are held every two years. House of Representatives members are elected for three years.

  1. The comparison of the US President and the British Prime Minister appears from the ...

    The president though, through his use of executive powers, appears to have almost unlimited powers in foreign affairs, whereas Congress are more concerned with domestic issues. Both offices are faced with the scrutiny of committees within the legislatures of the respective systems.

  2. The argument that the media have an effect on political attitudes and opinions is ...

    The final major theory about press bias is that the press does have an influence on voting behaviour and political attitudes. According to this theory, if someone reads, for example, a newspaper that is biased in favour of the Conservative party, they would be more inclined to vote Conservative than someone who reads a newspaper which supports the Labour party.

  1. "Parliament carries out none of it's function adequately". Discuss

    I think that Parliament has not carried out this process well in the past, but now, with a coalition in power, there is a larger degree of debate around Bills ? two parties are in control, not two. Another function of Parliament is representation ? linking the people to the government.

  2. How successful have the UK constitutional reforms been since 1997?

    With the Scottish university fees covered for students, England?s aren?t. This has caused large controversy over the success of devolution because it?s simply unfair. Also devolution was brought in to allow individual in institutions to govern the people who apply to them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work