• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the implications of the conservative belief in an organic society

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Explain the implications of the conservative belief in an organic society? According to traditional conservatives-organic society isn?t constructed with individual parts but is a living thing, which naturally has fragile parts. Therefore it isn?t mechanically re-assembled, as it would make society artificial. Traditional conservatives reject negative freedom and identify organic society as being the instrument, which enables people to fit in comfortably as there will be no isolation. There are allusions to Hobbes pessimistic view of human nature (in which life would be ?nasty, brutish and short?)- this implies that the organic society is the shield that protects individuals from the human nature of others. ...read more.

Middle

A classical belief of preservation and keeping everything traditional derives from organic society. Socialists and liberals view rational humans as having the ability to change through reform and revolution, thus an organic society enables conservatives to keep the things, which work (as they have been tested by time). Society itself is molded together with different elements that have been accumulated over centuries, thus it is beyond human control and should smoothly be continuous. Oakseshott remarked society is ?boundless and bottomless?: this supplements of keeping an organic society which respects tradition rather than an individualistic which has the ability to lead into radical ideas. ...read more.

Conclusion

For example, the British monarchy is a part of society because it is associated to law, order and authority. It is beyond human control to abolish an institution like this and break the ?delicate? fabric- for example: A million people celebrated the 2011 British royal wedding- because it is culturally significant to society. However, the new right view of society (Thatcher and Reagan) is of atomistic individualism-this implies the individual is greater than society. Thatcher remarked that ?there is no such thing as society? and ?it?s our duty to look after ourselves?- this neo-liberal view illustrates the idea that individual freedom should strive and there shouldn?t be a worry about their social obligations (something which is traditionally important). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Distinguish between negative and positive freedom and explain the implications of each for the ...

    Outline a Liberal case for toleration and pluralism. Voltaire's declaration "I detest what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it" summaries the Liberalist belief of toleration. For Liberals, toleration is forbearance, a willingness to allow individuals to think, speak and acts in manners that others may disapprove.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    Locke believed person to stand for, "... a thinking, intelligent being, that has reason and reflection, and can consider itself as itself, the same thinking thing in different times and places, which it only does by that consciousness which is inseparable from thinking."

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    It will also decrease the descriptive or anecdotal nature of the knowledge that political scientists have about organizations and will make that knowledge more systematic than it currently is and easier to integrate into the field of organizational learning than it has been.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Classical Liberal position with the Conservative position on the issue ...

    In recent decades, many countries including Australia have experienced an increase in illicit drug use, particularly amongst young people. "This shift has prompted governments, welfare and treatment agencies, among other organizations to develop systematic programmes and policy responses to the problem of illicit drug use" (Duff, 2004, p.

  1. Did Athenian democracy erode popular belief in divination? If so why?

    It highlights that the oracle mongers were nothing but frauds, only eager for the money that the success of the campaign would have brought in.7 Thus, after this wrong interpretation of the oracles, the Athenians did not publicly consult any forms of divination for political matters.

  2. Compare Hobbes and Locke's views on the obligation to obey the law.

    This is called the ?particularity requirement? (Simmons). Arguments for political obligation always rely on some background moral assumptions (e.g. that people have a moral obligation to keep their promises). The idea is to use moral assumptions which are so widely shared that almost no-one would dispute them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work