• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the implications of the conservative belief in an organic society

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Explain the implications of the conservative belief in an organic society? According to traditional conservatives-organic society isn?t constructed with individual parts but is a living thing, which naturally has fragile parts. Therefore it isn?t mechanically re-assembled, as it would make society artificial. Traditional conservatives reject negative freedom and identify organic society as being the instrument, which enables people to fit in comfortably as there will be no isolation. There are allusions to Hobbes pessimistic view of human nature (in which life would be ?nasty, brutish and short?)- this implies that the organic society is the shield that protects individuals from the human nature of others. ...read more.


A classical belief of preservation and keeping everything traditional derives from organic society. Socialists and liberals view rational humans as having the ability to change through reform and revolution, thus an organic society enables conservatives to keep the things, which work (as they have been tested by time). Society itself is molded together with different elements that have been accumulated over centuries, thus it is beyond human control and should smoothly be continuous. Oakseshott remarked society is ?boundless and bottomless?: this supplements of keeping an organic society which respects tradition rather than an individualistic which has the ability to lead into radical ideas. ...read more.


For example, the British monarchy is a part of society because it is associated to law, order and authority. It is beyond human control to abolish an institution like this and break the ?delicate? fabric- for example: A million people celebrated the 2011 British royal wedding- because it is culturally significant to society. However, the new right view of society (Thatcher and Reagan) is of atomistic individualism-this implies the individual is greater than society. Thatcher remarked that ?there is no such thing as society? and ?it?s our duty to look after ourselves?- this neo-liberal view illustrates the idea that individual freedom should strive and there shouldn?t be a worry about their social obligations (something which is traditionally important). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Distinguish between negative and positive freedom and explain the implications of each for the ...

    Toleration and pluralism allow individuals freedom of choice in various aspects of life, for example, the 4ight to choose which religion they worship or which political party they give their allegiance. In this way, toleration and pluralism allow for personal development and social enrichment since they allow for a diversity of beliefs and opinions within society.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    Locke believed person to stand for, "... a thinking, intelligent being, that has reason and reflection, and can consider itself as itself, the same thinking thing in different times and places, which it only does by that consciousness which is inseparable from thinking."

  1. Compare and Contrast the Classical Liberal position with the Conservative position on the issue ...

    The conservatives on the other hand believe that present society needs to strengthen the existing legislation by implementing tougher penalties for deterrence. The Conservatives agree with the Classical Liberals that the current legislation is not rational due to some legal drugs being more harmful then illegal ones.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    then can one hope to clarify what kind of single-loop or double-loop learning is likely to occur. For example, Coopey (1995) argued, correctly in my view, that where the distribution of power within an organization is hierarchical and asymmetrical, the type of organizational learning that proceeds in such contexts will tend to buttress the status quo.

  1. Did Athenian democracy erode popular belief in divination? If so why?

    The Sicilian expedition, from 415BC, also demonstrates the dominance of Athenian democracy and it is this specific event that led to the disbelief of divination. Thucydides states after the defeat of the Athenians at Syracuse, that the people turned

  2. Compare Hobbes and Locke's views on the obligation to obey the law.

    For example, if the chairman of the board says to the other directors ?I propose we do X. Please raise your hand if you object,? and the directors know that if they raise their hands then they will lose their job and their golden handshake, consent would be indicated by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work