• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the implications of the conservative belief in an organic society

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Explain the implications of the conservative belief in an organic society? According to traditional conservatives-organic society isn?t constructed with individual parts but is a living thing, which naturally has fragile parts. Therefore it isn?t mechanically re-assembled, as it would make society artificial. Traditional conservatives reject negative freedom and identify organic society as being the instrument, which enables people to fit in comfortably as there will be no isolation. There are allusions to Hobbes pessimistic view of human nature (in which life would be ?nasty, brutish and short?)- this implies that the organic society is the shield that protects individuals from the human nature of others. ...read more.


A classical belief of preservation and keeping everything traditional derives from organic society. Socialists and liberals view rational humans as having the ability to change through reform and revolution, thus an organic society enables conservatives to keep the things, which work (as they have been tested by time). Society itself is molded together with different elements that have been accumulated over centuries, thus it is beyond human control and should smoothly be continuous. Oakseshott remarked society is ?boundless and bottomless?: this supplements of keeping an organic society which respects tradition rather than an individualistic which has the ability to lead into radical ideas. ...read more.


For example, the British monarchy is a part of society because it is associated to law, order and authority. It is beyond human control to abolish an institution like this and break the ?delicate? fabric- for example: A million people celebrated the 2011 British royal wedding- because it is culturally significant to society. However, the new right view of society (Thatcher and Reagan) is of atomistic individualism-this implies the individual is greater than society. Thatcher remarked that ?there is no such thing as society? and ?it?s our duty to look after ourselves?- this neo-liberal view illustrates the idea that individual freedom should strive and there shouldn?t be a worry about their social obligations (something which is traditionally important). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    It is for this reason that people enter into a social contract and appoint a soveriegn. The sovereign has the ability to protect those whose property is in danger, and will do so through the passing and enforcing of laws.

  2. Compare and Contrast the Classical Liberal position with the Conservative position on the issue ...

    In recent decades, many countries including Australia have experienced an increase in illicit drug use, particularly amongst young people. "This shift has prompted governments, welfare and treatment agencies, among other organizations to develop systematic programmes and policy responses to the problem of illicit drug use" (Duff, 2004, p.

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Potential learning that would upset this balance of forces finds very rough sledding. The treatment of whistle-blowers, who sometimes go public with revelations of misguided or distorted policies or of bad methods used in their administration, is eloquent evidence of this problem.

  2. Did Athenian democracy erode popular belief in divination? If so why?

    against the: '...Prophets and soothsayers, and all who at the time had, by various methods of divination, encouraged them to believe that they would conquer Sicily.'6 On a basic level, this merely demonstrates that the oracle mongers had misused their interpretation, in accordance with the will of the government, who had already decided to embark on this expedition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work