• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the main features of Marx’ theory of history.

Extracts from this document...


Explain the main features of Marx' theory of history The opening words of the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels read `the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles'. Marx believed he had discovered the fact that classes were linked to historical periods and the nature if production. He believed that a series of class struggles and revolutions would eventually lead to a classless society. According to A. Heywood, Marx' philosophy on history `outlines why capitalism is doomed and why socialism is destined to replace it'. Marx' theory of history goes further than this however, as Marx said; `the philosophers have only interpreted the world, the point however is to change it'. He therefore believed his work to be `scientific'. Engels declared that he had uncovered the `laws' of historical and social development in his theory of `historical materialism'. Historical materialism held that material circumstances were fundamental to all forms of social and historical development. It reflected the belief that the `means of production' were the most crucial of all human activity. Marx said that `what individuals are therefore, depends on the material conditions of their production'. ...read more.


Man having alienated himself from his creative essence, loses all sense of what it is to be human. What Marx did is combine Hegel's dialectic with his own historical materialism. Thus he `turned Hegel on his head', in Engels words, explaining historical change by reference to internal contradictions within each mode of production arising from the existence of private property. He regarded the conflicts in interest of the major social classes as being rooted in the basic economic structure and was the motor force of history. In Marx' theory he divided history into a series of stages, each characterised by its own economic structure, means of production and class system; firstly, the primitive and tribal society where material scarcity created conflict, secondly, slavery where conflict existed between the master and the slave, thirdly, feudalism where conflict existed between landowners and the peasants, and fourthly, capitalism where conflict existed between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. For Marx, all societies where the means of production was owned by a minority, the relations of production are exploitive, as the majority will be forced to work for subsistence pay, while the parasitic minority uses its economic power to appropriate the surplus. ...read more.


The inevitable final stage of history for Marx would be the socialist turning into the communist state, where all were equal and because private property would be removed there would be no need for conflict. The communist state would essentially become the synthesis of history. The transcendence of alienation is brought about by communism, the goal of history and recovery by man of his `natural essence'. People living under a system of communal property, would no longer feel estranged from their fellow citizens or sources of power. Communism would do away with private property in the means of production, as well as all the evils that it creates; class conflicts, inequality, religion, crime, and state repression. In conclusion, with Marx' theory of history nothing is permanent until the communist establishment. As societies productive forces develop, they clash with existing production, or property, which restrict their growth. This `contradiction' provokes a `class war' between those who want to maintain the old relations and those who seek a new order. This conflict is resolved in favour of progress, as new means of production emerge which better suit the development of society's material capacity. Suitable legal and political relationships then grow in response to the altered material situation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    This point is the introduction of money. The introduction of money essentially puts the spoilage proviso into non-use as now one can appropriate more land than one needs and barter or sell the rest for a profit. The invention of money also leads to making land scarce, as it gives man the moral right to enlarge their

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    In the public/political sector, a key test of how seriously the center wishes to encourage diversity and favor empowerment lies in the practice of devolution, as opposed to decentralization. Devolution, typically practiced on a territorial basis, substantially reduces the powers of the center over the periphery, sometimes drastically.

  1. What are the main features of utilitarianism as an ethical theory (10) Examine and ...

    that Newton's scientific findings have brought about a lot of happiness for thousands if not millions of people and that that is worth sacrificing other lives. This is because more people would gain pleasure than those suffering pain or other such like.

  2. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    This leads into the concept of 'self-regarding' and 'other-regarding' actions. 'Self-regarding' actions are those which effect only yourself so therefore the you can exercise absolute freedom. Whereas 'other-regarding' actions which can restrict the freedom of others or do them damage.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    The findings of sociology are by and large correct, that is to say they are not false but limited, and this limitation creates internal distortions. Yet sociology still retains what Marx defined as the character of a science, that is an autonomy based on consistent, scientific and logical rigour.

  2. How did Marx conceive the transition from capitalism to communism?

    The ways in which he tackled social problems (mentioned above) may be considered to have conformed to Marx's theories for the reason that the ideology was merely tweaked and proved successful in building Socialism. The means in which Lenin tackled the economical problems proved to be extremely successful, but when

  1. What did Karl Marx mean by 'exploitation' in a capitalist economic system?

    Effectively all profit making organisations are actually exploiting their workforce, because the wealth should be spread evenly among the workers due to surplus value being taken. (Ballinger & Olsson, 1997) There are those who argue, that exploitation of the worker has been reduced in recent times, due to increases in wages and lifestyle.

  2. Why did Marx and Engels believe that history was on their side?

    Schumpeter's second important contribution was to call attention to the relationship between industrial structure and technological advance. In particular, he called attention to the fact that, while innovation was a central form of competition in many industries, the structure of those industries never was "perfectly competitive" in the sense articulated in standard macroeconomic theory textbooks.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work