• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Reasons Why the Israeli State Found It Difficult to Defeat or Come to Terms with the Palestinian Liberation Organization

Extracts from this document...


Explain the Reasons Why the Israeli State Found It Difficult to Defeat or Come to Terms with the Palestinian Liberation Organization There are many different reasons why the Israeli state found it difficult to defeat or come to terms with the P.L.O. One such reason was the attitude and desires of the Palestinians. The same nationalism that motivated Zionists and created Israel in 1948 is now motivating the Palestinians. They want Palestine back and insist that Jerusalem is their capital. However, even with this newly instilled driving force the Jews still succeeded in the many wars fought around the region and maintained control over the disputed land. The conditions of the Palestinian refugee camps were squalid, and 3-4 million Palestinian refugees have densely populated them since 1948. The Israelis use the argument that the surrounding Arab nations could easily absorb them and that they are better equipped to deal with them in their multitude of unoccupied land and massive oil wealth. However the neighbouring Arab countries have steadfastly refused to accept the refugees since the late 1960s. The loss of the wars and the state of the refugee camps are two factors that led to the Palestinians turning to terrorism and guerilla warfare. ...read more.


This agreement involved Sadat the Egyptian president regaining the Sinai in return for a pledge of peace with Israel. Sadat was later assassinated in 1981 by his own soldiers during a military parade. They believed that he had disgraced Islam by making a deal with the Israelis. This acted as a deterrent to other leaders to avoid peace deals, by making them fear for their own lives. This made it difficult for the Israelis to come to terms with the P.L.O. In 1988 the P.L.O. accepted UN resolutions 238 and 242. This means that for the first time they accepted the right of Israel to exist. However, as Arafat and the P.L.O. became more moderate in a search for peace, more extreme groups have come to being such as Hamas and Hizbollah. These groups have caused new problems in the search for peace. They carry out regular attacks on Israeli soldiers and civilians. This put Arafat in difficult positions where he would promise that there would be no more attacks and Hamas would carry out an attack leaving him looking out of his depth. ...read more.


Secondly I believe it shows the way in which the Israeli state is unwilling to give any concession to the Palestinians, and that they would only ever consider such a move under great pressure from the outside world or America, their great friends, shown by Bill Clinton. In conclusion, the main reasons why the Israeli state found it difficult to defeat or come to terms with the P.L.O. are * A fear of assassination after a compromise is made * The new found Palestinian desire to return to their homeland * The terrorist tactics and guerrilla warfare used by the P.L.O. * The change in world opinion after the Intifada * The troubles caused by extremist new groups * The consequent hard-line politicians becoming more vocal * The hatred between the peoples The biggest question mark though remains over Yasser Arafat and whether or not he can be trusted. The Israelis do not know for sure whether he truly believes in co existing with Israel or whether he is secretly encouraging bombers behind closed doors in order to gain more. Deals have been done with Arafat because he seemed the best hope for peace. This remains still to be seen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    because of the large media coverage so many terrorist attack tactics have these similarities. There can be differences however, for example when pro-democracy protestors gathered at Tiananmen Square, Beijing, the Chinese government sent in the army, which opened fire on the protestors resulting in the deaths of many.

  2. Why is there still so much fear, suspicion and hatred between the Israelis and ...

    The outcome of this war affected the Arab attitude too. They saw it as a shameful and humiliating defeat and the Arabs blamed the Israelis for this. Even now, many trace the decline of the Palestinians from the 1967 war onwards to the Six Day War.

  1. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    Recognizing its dependence on Syria and Syrian military forces to preserve peace, the Lebanese government generally cooperated. But as a result of the Egyptian-Israeli peace negotiations and Syria's rapprochement with the PLO, Lebanese-Syrian relations cooled. From early 1980, Syria became preoccupied with its domestic difficulties and leaves Sarkis administration.

  2. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    the Palestine Liberation Organization, and Yitzak Rabin, Prime Minister of Israel, signed their historic "Declaration of Principles" (DOP) on the lawn of the White House. Known also as the Oslo Accord and the "Jericho-Gaza First Agreement," the pact set into motion a five year transitional designed to lead toward "autonomy" for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.

  1. The Kurds - A struggle for a state.

    and minerals, which are Crops, Their crops can be a good income source, but unfortunately they are persecuted agriculturally too.

  2. Why has it been so difficult to make peace in the Middle East?

    In 1919 Britain was given a mandate to govern Palestine. For the next 30 years the British government was to rule the country. The Arabs of Palestine felt that they had simply exchanged Turkish rulers for British ones. The Palestinian Arabs were even more angered by increasing immigration and the

  1. 'The new Palestinian Revolt',

    The primary issue in 1945 was of Jewish immigration to Palestine, the British opposed the immediate entry of 100,000 refugees due to political considerations, Jews saw the new government in Britain as having reversed on promises made earlier to the Zionists, and was no longer interested in creating a Jewish

  2. The Jewish State

    (Herzl, 1896). This means that their prosperity lies within their dedication to the new found land and country. After Theodor Herzl published his book in 1896, the message that he was trying to pass on to people started to be heard by the Jewish population.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work