• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Reasons Why the Israeli State Found It Difficult to Defeat or Come to Terms with the Palestinian Liberation Organization

Extracts from this document...


Explain the Reasons Why the Israeli State Found It Difficult to Defeat or Come to Terms with the Palestinian Liberation Organization There are many different reasons why the Israeli state found it difficult to defeat or come to terms with the P.L.O. One such reason was the attitude and desires of the Palestinians. The same nationalism that motivated Zionists and created Israel in 1948 is now motivating the Palestinians. They want Palestine back and insist that Jerusalem is their capital. However, even with this newly instilled driving force the Jews still succeeded in the many wars fought around the region and maintained control over the disputed land. The conditions of the Palestinian refugee camps were squalid, and 3-4 million Palestinian refugees have densely populated them since 1948. The Israelis use the argument that the surrounding Arab nations could easily absorb them and that they are better equipped to deal with them in their multitude of unoccupied land and massive oil wealth. However the neighbouring Arab countries have steadfastly refused to accept the refugees since the late 1960s. The loss of the wars and the state of the refugee camps are two factors that led to the Palestinians turning to terrorism and guerilla warfare. ...read more.


This agreement involved Sadat the Egyptian president regaining the Sinai in return for a pledge of peace with Israel. Sadat was later assassinated in 1981 by his own soldiers during a military parade. They believed that he had disgraced Islam by making a deal with the Israelis. This acted as a deterrent to other leaders to avoid peace deals, by making them fear for their own lives. This made it difficult for the Israelis to come to terms with the P.L.O. In 1988 the P.L.O. accepted UN resolutions 238 and 242. This means that for the first time they accepted the right of Israel to exist. However, as Arafat and the P.L.O. became more moderate in a search for peace, more extreme groups have come to being such as Hamas and Hizbollah. These groups have caused new problems in the search for peace. They carry out regular attacks on Israeli soldiers and civilians. This put Arafat in difficult positions where he would promise that there would be no more attacks and Hamas would carry out an attack leaving him looking out of his depth. ...read more.


Secondly I believe it shows the way in which the Israeli state is unwilling to give any concession to the Palestinians, and that they would only ever consider such a move under great pressure from the outside world or America, their great friends, shown by Bill Clinton. In conclusion, the main reasons why the Israeli state found it difficult to defeat or come to terms with the P.L.O. are * A fear of assassination after a compromise is made * The new found Palestinian desire to return to their homeland * The terrorist tactics and guerrilla warfare used by the P.L.O. * The change in world opinion after the Intifada * The troubles caused by extremist new groups * The consequent hard-line politicians becoming more vocal * The hatred between the peoples The biggest question mark though remains over Yasser Arafat and whether or not he can be trusted. The Israelis do not know for sure whether he truly believes in co existing with Israel or whether he is secretly encouraging bombers behind closed doors in order to gain more. Deals have been done with Arafat because he seemed the best hope for peace. This remains still to be seen. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Why has it been so difficult to bring peace in the Middle East?

    The Suez was then still a key route for world trade, especially for the flow of Gulf oil into the economies of the western world. In October 29th along with the powers of Britain and France, to join in what amounted to an invasion of Egypt.

  2. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    An intricate framework was structured for the three day Madrid Conference, followed by the start of negotiations. Two parallel negotiating tracks were established by Madrid: the bilateral track and the multilateral track. Four separate sets of bilateral negotiations put Israel together with Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and the Palestinian delegation, intended to resolve past conflicts and sign peace treaties.

  1. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    There are many different reasons why people would resort to terror tactics in order to achieve their aims. One motive is to gain publicity for their cause or organisation. This is normally a part of many terrorist attacks such as 9/11 where it made Al- Qaeda the most famous terrorist group in the world.

  2. Question 2 - What factors lead to the breakdown of the 1993 Israeli-Palestinian Peace ...

    Ten people were killed in the blasts, all between the ages of 14 and 20, 19 were critically injured, with 28 others sustaining moderate injuries, the rest injured lightly. These terrorist attacks were, once again, greeted with disgust and dismay from the Jews and Arab moderates, however Arab fundamentalists were pleased by the attacks.

  1. Why was the State of Israel successfully established in 1948?

    Arab hopes of establishing a single state in Palestine also would not have worked, they didn't even have the resources to establish a state in the half granted to the Palestinians under the partition plan. The future of Palestine lay in the hands of the Jews.

  2. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    However, in that time, Palestinian's supported by Muslim's progressive groups step by step becomes very powerful in Lebannon and especially in Beirut and they run against the Lebanon's Army. In those conflicts significant parts of Beirut were destroyed, particularly very important trade and bank center of city.

  1. Why is it difficult to keep peace talks going in the Middle East?

    feel safe and in fact blames Palestinian authorities (at the time Yasser Arafat) for failure to control the violence. They believed Yasser Arafat himself purposefully failed to crack down on and gave unspoken support to the terrorists. Both Muslim and Jewish fundamentalist groups oppose any compromise to peace which involves the sharing of Palestine.

  2. The role of International law in regards to The Palestinian Dilemma.

    Palestine of their territory and transfer it to the exclusive use of a minority in the country..."11 The problematic legal nature of the General Assembly's partition resolution was further developed by the leading legal theorist of the time, Hans Kelsen.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work