• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the significance of the New Hampshire Primary and the Iowa Caucus in the presidential nomination process. The national party conventions no longer serve any significant purpose. Discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A. Explain the significance of the New Hampshire Primary and the Iowa Caucus in the presidential nomination process. New Hampshire state law stays that the New Hampshire Primary is to be the first Primary in the nations, a tradition since the early 1920s. In an attempt to do this, the date has been moved back and back from the 2nd Tuesday in March in the 1950s, to the 2nd Tuesday in January in the 2008 election period. This trend is shifted in accordance with the changing dates of primaries in other states. Before Carter brought the Iowa Caucus to national 'limelight' in 1976, the New Hampshire primary was the first proper indication of which candidate would receive a party nomination. The people of New Hampshire strongly defend their Primary as being the 'real deal', with Governor John Sununu saying in 1988 that "the people of Iowa pick corn, the people of New Hampshire pick presidents". Since this, it has been generally accepted that the New Hampshire primary is an early gauge of national sentiment towards the candidates for nomination. The primary has the advantage of determining the number of votes each candidate receives, rather than in a Caucus, which measures support through precinct delegates. ...read more.

Middle

Many point to the media as the true creator of the prominent political role that Iowa enjoys. Since 1972, where McGoven received a better than expected result in the Iowa Caucus, the media have kept a close eye on the Iowa Caucuses. Iowa's status as the first presidential test in the nation is constantly under attack. In 2003, the District of Columbia lobbied unsuccessfully to be allowed to move its primary before Iowa's caucus. In the 2008 election, states have shuffled their primary schedules, all in order to attract more attention to their state. And a group of 40 states met in Washington, D.C., in February 2007 to discuss a rotating primary schedule to begin in 2012, so states can share the importance of being the first in the presidential nominating process. As long as Iowa is able to hang onto its status as first in the nation, it appears that it will keep its prominent place in the nation's political climate. B. The national party conventions no longer serve any significant purpose. Discuss. An important function of the party conventions is to deicde upon a party platform. ...read more.

Conclusion

Compared to the UK, the party convention is much grander than in the UK, and it is more formal as they have specific tasks to perform, such as elect the candidate. While this is the tradition roll of the Labour Party Conference, it is, in practice, no longer so. Party conferences in the UK are an annual things, comapared to every 4 years in America, and in the UK, they serve more as a ceremonial address to the party to keep thinks ticking over. To conclude, the current party conventions are little more than a scripted, choreographed, sanitised convention for the masses. They are almost completely devoid of political content, debate or indeed anything else of importance. They simply exist to serve as a fa´┐Żade to the people of America, to showcase to the world how devoted and comitted they are. Sadly, the people of America see this entire baboon exhibition as a real factor to consider when voting. In the reality, a party with a poor convention, has poor electoral success, as seen by the 1992 Republican convention - Buchanan's speech was seen to be abrasive and went a long way to assiting in the defeat of the party at the ballot. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the view that the arguments for having an electoral college to elect the ...

    5 star(s)

    Truly, this is a two party system! However, the 1968 election paints a different picture. George Wallace (also running as an independent) only gained 13% of the popular vote, far below that Perot would gain 24 years later, however he managed to claim almost 50 ECVs and 5 states.

  2. US pressures groups are undemocratic, discuss

    The Christian Fundamentalist Liberty Foundation is counteracted by the National Abortion Federation (NAF) and the National Organisation of Women (NOW) over the issue of abortion; the NRA is opposed by the Coalition to End Gun Violence (of which the Brady Group is a member.)

  1. Consider whether the growth of primary elections in the Presidential nomination process has reduced ...

    Prior to the official primary season beginning, voters are asked to declare their party affiliation (if any); in "closed" primaries, only declared Democrats can vote in the Democrat primary. This could be seen to make the system fairer, as the electorate here are only voting for the candidate they wish to run for President.

  2. Using examples, explain the limitations on the Supreme Courts powers.How do Presidents veto legislation, ...

    The president may 'leave the bill on his desk' because they have position on the bill or because he would like to veto the bill but knows it would result in being overridden, this bill will become law without his signature within 10 congressional working days.

  1. Free essay

    Should the primary system be reformed?

    In some respects this discontinuity can be seen as a good thing: states with comparatively small populations are given a chance to have an impact; if all the primaries were held at the same time, states like Iowa would become irrelevant, when contrasted with states like California, New York and Texas, which seat far more delegates.

  2. Does public participation in the presidential nomination process advance or hinder democracy?

    Also, candidates are rejecting the matching funds offer so that they can raise the biggest amount of money and make the race uneven and unequal.

  1. Assess the significance of race, gender and religion as factors influencing US voting behaviour. ...

    by the Republican Party, through heavy influence of the social conservative faction within the party, particularly. These policies include pro-life, pro-family values which are thusly, anti-gay marriage and anti-drug, among more. Because of these policies, the Protestant vote is almost solely captured by the Republicans thanks to the heavy grass-roots

  2. Evaluate the role of Televised debates in US presidential campaigns

    With election day less than a week away, he managed to shape the way voters would make up their minds in these vital last days of the campaign. Support for President Carter fell away badly following the debate, and on election day he won less than six states, plus the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work