• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Success and Failure of Constitutions.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Explain the Success and Failure of Constitutions Constitutions can be defined in a variety of different ways. Duchacek , in 1970 described constitutions as "power maps", in which the formal powers of the state are described and distributed. A more explicit definition can be gauged from Robertson , who describes the constitution as, "a set of rights, powers and procedures regulating the structure of, and relationships among the public authorities and between the public authorities and the citizens." This long definition is condensed by Watson , who describes constitutions as the "rules of the political game" and "the laws that govern the governors." Constitutions usually have come into existence to facilitate a "fresh start" following the demise of the past regime via revolution, independence, or a change in society. Constitutions are not infallible and can fail if the conditions are right; those conditions will be discussed in this essay. ...read more.

Middle

Even supposedly rigid, written constitutions can respond to changes in society, an important property if that constitution is to succeed. In the United States, judicial constitutional interpretation plays an important part in placing a constitution written over two hundred years ago into the context of the modern day. Chief Justice Hughes' statement; "We live under a constitution. But the constitution is what the judges say it is." This may not be wholly accurate, but judicial interpretation has been an important factor in the continual evolution of the American Constitution, which encouraging its success. Finally, the success of constitutions can be attributed to the economic factors within the state. Germany and Japan have for the past fifty years possessed successful constitutions, which can, to a degree be attributed to their very strong economies. Following the Second World War, the allies, by buoying up the economies of these two nations, prevented them from falling to the short-term problems, such as nationalism and communism. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many of the fledgling governments fell, as single rulers, often helped by the military filled the vacuum. Countries whose democratic governments survived, for example India and Pakistan experienced the move toward strong centrally controlled government, undermining the democracy the constitution represented. It is often not the constitution that fails, but the regime that facilitates the change because it is weak, and cannot remain in office for too long a period. The constitution may succeed in providing the checks and balances of power, but if the regime lost the support of the military, there would then be scope for change Constitutions are not always liable to succeed; the above examples indicate that. A successful one allows change, can be interpreted by the judiciary and is assisted by a healthy economic climate. A failure is doomed to be ineffective because it is too restrained, and not allowed to change as society develops. Explanations for the success and failure of constitutions can be diverse, particularly in today's global society; the reasons above are only a selection of what can constitute a constitutional success or failiure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Federalism essay

    Different groups have used the same Article to argue separate points; many claim it to be irrelevant in modern America. In the American Constitution the federal government has been granted autonomy from the state governments, but this is checked with the powerful state influence in Congress.

  2. The British Constitution

    Baron Montesquieu's view was that if you keep the powers separate, the democracy will survive and there will be no dictatorship. Most western constitutions have taken this on to some extent. "[t]he executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.

  1. Explain the Advantages and Disadvantes of the British and American Constitutions

    But in my opinion the European Convention on Human Rights has proved an effective safeguard- even if it is slower and more expensive, it serves its purpose. In defence of American constitution it is fair to say it maintains a degree of flexibility in that it is constantly evolving and changing its practical application i.e.

  2. US Constitution Definition of Terms

    Delegated or Enumerated Powers Powers given to the federal government by the terms of the US constitution. Under Article II of the Articles of Confederation, the Confederation Congress's powers were limited to those explicitly granted by that document. 'Full Faith & Credit' Clause Article IV, Section 1 of the US

  1. presidential power how far does it go

    This is not a question of ideals. It is a matter of preserve and protect. The case of Yaser Esam Hamdi highlights the debate on confinement of an American citizen imprisoned as a foreign combatant. The incarceration was permitted although appeals were permitted with respect to designation as foreign combatant "based on law-of-war principles".

  2. Identify and explain all the factors which encouraged and discouraged change during 1863-77

    As a response to the Thirteenth Amendment the south introduced the Black Codes, this certainly discouraged any change. Black Codes intended to avoid the extension of voting rights to freed slaves. The intention of these codes was to make sure that African Americans never acquired land or property.

  1. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    it likes, only areas where power has been given to them under the constitution, and states cannot pass any law it likes if the federal government has been given power to deal with that area of policy. Bill of Rights The final device by the constitution used to limit the government is the Bill of Rights.

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    It took over thirty years for the court to finally nationalize the constitutional protection against double jeopardy. Gun control or the right to bear arms is different than it was in 1791 when the Bills of Rights were ratified on the United States Constitution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work