• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain two criticisms of judicial review as a check on the executive.

Extracts from this document...


Transfer-Encoding: chunked ´╗┐Explain two criticisms of judicial review as a check on the executive. [10] Everyone is bound by the Law, including Ministers, Public Officials and others. Public Officials should therefore use their power reasonably and not act ultra vires. This is upheld by Judicial Review, the power of the Judiciary to review and possibly overturn laws, decrees and actions of other branches of government and public bodies. However, this process could be criticised. Firstly, the people must pay for it out of their own pocket with no guarantee of victory. Legal Disputes may be prohibitively costly. Only the wealthy can afford top lawyers and access to legal aid is not always easy and may exclude those from mid Income groups. ...read more.


In April 2014 the government produced amendments to lower the household income threshold from which you are not able to access legal aid. Furthermore, they made amendments to the civil merits test to prevent the funding of any cases with less than a 50% chance of success. They also made the claimant's friends, colleagues, family and associates ? anyone who might be able to help them financially, basically - liable to the legal costs. The emotional impact of this is severe. Someone may be willing to risk their own wellbeing and livelihood for something they believe in, but it feels entirely different if you?re risking the livelihood of those around you. ...read more.


Baroness Hale is the only woman. In 2012 their average age was 66 and 11 of the 12 Supreme Court justices went to Oxford or Cambridge University. This would suggest that they are much more likely to side with Cameron?s Conservative government. Up until the 1990s there was a good deal of evidence that suggested the background of senior judges does affect their outlook. During the 1980s particularly there had been a succession of cases concerning trade union rights and activities, conflicts between central and local government, and issues about the powers of the police where judges ruled consistently in favour of the centralised state. To conclude, although the recent reforms of the judiciary have made it more effective these criticisms prove that it still has a long way to go before it is a proper check on the Executive. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. How effective is Parliament as a check on the executive?

    At the 2010 Labour party conference which saw Ed Miliband elected party leader, Harriet Harman and several other Labour MP's were applauding Miliband's anti Iraq war comments even though they had voted in favour of the Iraq War in 2003. The House of Commons is dominated by the governing party.

  2. Reform of the judiciary has made it a powerful check on the executive. How ...

    There were over 11,000 cases of Judicial Review in 2014 compared with 513 in 1980. Examples of reviews include when Labour Home Secretary David Blunkett was forced to reverse a decision on not paying welfare payments to immigrants in 2003 after a judicial review successfully questioned the legality of it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work